Author Topic: Jay Schulz [merged]  (Read 26783 times)

Bull

  • Guest
Re: Schulz
« Reply #165 on: October 13, 2007, 02:13:27 PM »
Read todays Age Roger.

Sure it may not be 100% but would be pretty close to the mark.

The thing that is scary is the $275 quoted in the paper is what he will earn next year at a minimum.

If he plays all year he will be $300plus  ::) ::) ::)

Offline rogerd3

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: Schulz
« Reply #166 on: October 13, 2007, 06:06:58 PM »
Read todays Age Roger.

Sure it may not be 100% but would be pretty close to the mark.

The thing that is scary is the $275 quoted in the paper is what he will earn next year at a minimum.

If he plays all year he will be $300plus  ::) ::) ::)


thanks read the age and noticed that figure thrown out there, made a couple of calls to well sourced people within the football industry and was told flatly that this figure was incorrect by a margin.

Online cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7396
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Schulz
« Reply #167 on: October 13, 2007, 06:12:57 PM »


If he plays all year he will be $300plus  ::) ::) ::)

Well if he plays all year then he will be living up to the potential he has shown and starting to put in the work required.

Schulz is a funny one, hopefully this is the rocket he needed and he can make a career for himself.

'Must be next season tho'

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59534
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Schulz
« Reply #168 on: October 13, 2007, 10:30:11 PM »
What's the average AFL player's salary these days anyway? If it's around 220k then 275k isn't such a huge stretch even if this figure is right.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline mjs

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 497
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Schulz
« Reply #169 on: October 13, 2007, 10:48:20 PM »
Rhyce Shaw was reported as missing out on being traded to Lions because he wanted $200k - too expensive. I thought he was worth that. I imagine it's around 160k average.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59534
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Schulz
« Reply #170 on: October 14, 2007, 12:00:22 AM »
Rhyce Shaw was reported as missing out on being traded to Lions because he wanted $200k - too expensive. I thought he was worth that. I imagine it's around 160k average.
Cheers mjs.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Schulz
« Reply #171 on: October 14, 2007, 01:12:34 AM »
can tell you for sure $275k is way off the mark for this player in 2008
it be a 2 year contract figure
most bottom range AFL players are given a 2 year contract at 275K base & this came from a AFL player
The Age dont Caro work up there  :rollin

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Schulz
« Reply #172 on: October 14, 2007, 09:42:38 AM »
It's probably a back ended contract.
Anyway big deal $275k isn't excessive.

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5371
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Schulz
« Reply #173 on: October 14, 2007, 03:27:23 PM »
pull your arse into gear Schulz you piece of sh*t !

Bull

  • Guest
Re: Schulz
« Reply #174 on: October 14, 2007, 05:11:00 PM »
What's the average AFL player's salary these days anyway? If it's around 220k then 275k isn't such a huge stretch even if this figure is right.

I believe that the average is between 150 and 200.

Now 275k is excessive for someone who isnt playing senior football. :banghead :banghead :banghead

Gordon Bennett

  • Guest
Re: Schulz
« Reply #175 on: October 14, 2007, 07:14:58 PM »
pull your behind into gear Schulz you piece of sh*t !
statements like that give me the sh*ts.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14276
Re: Schulz
« Reply #176 on: October 14, 2007, 08:44:32 PM »
in a way i was hoping he and meyer would go elsewhere.

if i watched them succeed  as rodan and ottens have done, then i would be convinced that playerdevelopment at punt road of younger players is vertually non existent.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline bluey_21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2718
  • Road Runner
Re: Schulz
« Reply #177 on: October 14, 2007, 08:59:57 PM »
in a way i was hoping he and meyer would go elsewhere.

if i watched them succeed  as rodan and ottens have done, then i would be convinced that playerdevelopment at punt road of younger players is vertually non existent.



that's a big worry with me.

i actually like the talent that the club brings in, but the inability for the kids to kick on points to poor development. although i think the kids respond well to Craig McRae he needs better support around him though

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14276
Re: Schulz
« Reply #178 on: October 14, 2007, 09:39:16 PM »
in my opinion, its the number one problem at punt road.
they really dont have a clue in this area and wallace stop going to the solarium and pull your finger out of your date and hire some talent down there.
jade rawlings hardly the most successfull player in the AFL.
im a stong believer players with past success in the AFL bring that to the younger players and i dont know if wallace and his crew are in denial or are just tight with their money but we need a support group who actually do something worthwhile
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59534
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Schulz
« Reply #179 on: October 14, 2007, 10:27:41 PM »
in a way i was hoping he and meyer would go elsewhere.

if i watched them succeed  as rodan and ottens have done, then i would be convinced that playerdevelopment at punt road of younger players is vertually non existent.



that's a big worry with me.

i actually like the talent that the club brings in, but the inability for the kids to kick on points to poor development. although i think the kids respond well to Craig McRae he needs better support around him though
The problem at Richmond is these kids have the responsibility to perform major roles from go as the senior core around them is thin when it should instead be the senior players who carry the majority of the workload and let the kids develop around them. Lids, Blingers, etc are expected to dominate games or they are seen as failures. Take Lids - he's being tagged as a 20 year old for crying out loud because the opposition see him more as a threat than any senior player we have. Same with Foley who is only 21.

Rodan is a good example. He went to a club where he was No. 16-22 in their side and performed great feeding off the work of Port's star players. Come GF day he went missing because Port's star players were well held.

We need to first develop a new core first which is what we're slowly doing before we too can allow youngsters to develop in their own time with the structure of a more senior core around them.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd