Author Topic: Daniel Jackson [merged]  (Read 52574 times)

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #195 on: April 25, 2009, 11:04:55 PM »
JACKSON AND WHITE ARE BOTH S H I T

CORRECT!!!

DOUBLE CORRECT. Neither up to AFL

Agreed Chuckie.
I think that the pasting dished out by posters on DJ has been a pretty narrow view of his overall game TBH.
He has now played very well in 2 of our 5 games and certainly hasn't disgraced himself in the other games when compared to our so called senior players.
Give him a break, be patient and let him develop

Have a good look at these two games tonight.  Their attack was great but also their defenisve efforts, tackling and hardness at the ball.  Jackson was involved in both the clashes with Harvey and Firrito which seen them go off.

They may never be A grade midfielders but as depth midfielders they will be more than adequate.




It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #196 on: April 25, 2009, 11:50:49 PM »
Can't fault his work ethic nor his committment nor his toughness and courage but even on tonights effort which was a great game the thing that stands out for me was that clanger that result in a Sh1tboner goal. At least he was not run down from behind this week.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #197 on: April 26, 2009, 12:20:00 AM »
You can't knock Jacko's workrate and hardness tonight and his handballs were almost 100% effective but as Tucky said those clangers by foot are frustrating as hell especially as a contrast when he occasionally pulls off a 50m lace out pearler like he did to Jack tonight. He's too inconsistent by foot. Of Jacko's 20 or so kicks 8 missed their target  :-\. That's why he didn't get a vote from me even though he got the ball 33 times.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline 3rogerd

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 467
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #198 on: April 26, 2009, 01:33:30 AM »
he is a powerful kick but roots around too much with it.

Offline TigerTime

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 968
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #199 on: April 26, 2009, 11:13:05 AM »
alot to like about ranga jacksons game last night, there may be hope for him

Ox

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #200 on: April 26, 2009, 11:42:07 AM »
JACKSON AND WHITE ARE BOTH S H I T

CORRECT!!!

DOUBLE CORRECT. Neither up to AFL

Just like a lot of people.....oh well,at least the club stuffs the really sh it ones off... :thumbsup

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40317
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #201 on: April 26, 2009, 09:59:24 PM »
You can't knock Jacko's workrate and hardness tonight and his handballs were almost 100% effective but as Tucky said those clangers by foot are frustrating as hell especially as a contrast when he occasionally pulls off a 50m lace out pearler like he did to Jack tonight. He's too inconsistent by foot. Of Jacko's 20 or so kicks 8 missed their target  :-\. That's why he didn't get a vote from me even though he got the ball 33 times.

Ditto
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #202 on: April 26, 2009, 10:39:34 PM »
You can't knock Jacko's workrate and hardness tonight and his handballs were almost 100% effective but as Tucky said those clangers by foot are frustrating as hell especially as a contrast when he occasionally pulls off a 50m lace out pearler like he did to Jack tonight. He's too inconsistent by foot. Of Jacko's 20 or so kicks 8 missed their target  :-\. That's why he didn't get a vote from me even though he got the ball 33 times.

Ditto

pretty tough lads, there was only one real howler...not sure that even the elite have 100% efficiency ::)...he cointinues to improve , has fantastic workrate, with great tackling  and eyes for the footy :thumbsup
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #203 on: April 27, 2009, 12:16:35 AM »
You can't knock Jacko's workrate and hardness tonight and his handballs were almost 100% effective but as Tucky said those clangers by foot are frustrating as hell especially as a contrast when he occasionally pulls off a 50m lace out pearler like he did to Jack tonight. He's too inconsistent by foot. Of Jacko's 20 or so kicks 8 missed their target  :-\. That's why he didn't get a vote from me even though he got the ball 33 times.

Ditto

pretty tough lads, there was only one real howler...not sure that even the elite have 100% efficiency ::)...he cointinues to improve , has fantastic workrate, with great tackling  and eyes for the footy :thumbsup
No one is expecting Jacko to have 100% efficiency by foot bj but I don't think it's unfair either to expect higher than 64% which is his kicking efficiency and to show more consistency by foot. That goes for a few other Tigers as well.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline TigerTime

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 968
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #204 on: April 27, 2009, 08:41:00 AM »
You can't knock Jacko's workrate and hardness tonight and his handballs were almost 100% effective but as Tucky said those clangers by foot are frustrating as hell especially as a contrast when he occasionally pulls off a 50m lace out pearler like he did to Jack tonight. He's too inconsistent by foot. Of Jacko's 20 or so kicks 8 missed their target  :-\. That's why he didn't get a vote from me even though he got the ball 33 times.

Ditto

pretty tough lads, there was only one real howler...not sure that even the elite have 100% efficiency ::)...he cointinues to improve , has fantastic workrate, with great tackling  and eyes for the footy :thumbsup
No one is expecting Jacko to have 100% efficiency by foot bj but I don't think it's unfair either to expect higher than 64% which is his kicking efficiency and to show more consistency by foot. That goes for a few other Tigers as well.

a bit rough on jacko mt, white and foley are much worse kicks than jacko.  and what made jackos game great was his workrate, he made it to every contest and injured the kangas 2 best players!

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #205 on: April 27, 2009, 11:32:23 AM »
Best game I have ever seen him play.

Offline Beren

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 503
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #206 on: April 27, 2009, 03:51:53 PM »
a bit rough on jacko mt, white and foley are much worse kicks than jacko.  and what made jackos game great was his workrate, he made it to every contest and injured the kangas 2 best players!
What he said.
Jacko puts in the 1%ers too.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #207 on: May 03, 2009, 07:15:23 PM »
I've been critical of Jacko in the past (re: his disposal) but I thought today was one of his best for the Tigers. Got plenty of the ball while still being able to shut out and beat someone of the quality of Adam Goodes.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #208 on: May 03, 2009, 08:45:10 PM »
He was fantastic again today, now if we only get his break out year buddies Axel and Raines to ignite, we might be dangerous!
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #209 on: May 03, 2009, 09:49:34 PM »
Where are the Jackson bashers anyway.

Oh thats right gone onto Foley, Lids etc  :wallywink