Author Topic: Daniel Jackson [merged]  (Read 52643 times)

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Jackson
« Reply #405 on: March 30, 2012, 05:47:38 PM »
cant beleive how bad Vickery and Post were

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Jackson
« Reply #406 on: March 30, 2012, 05:59:56 PM »
And next wee km they will play well but u won't say a thing
Jackson tuck and Foley are kit problem not post and TV. They have upsides the other three just don't have skill poise not decision making skills

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Daniel Jackson
« Reply #407 on: March 30, 2012, 06:02:00 PM »
The best thing he did last night was to drop that mark in the 3rd which led to us kicking a goal. If Jackson had held the mark it would have gone out on the full. Drop him. Was ineffective as a tagger

Lol so true

P

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: Daniel Jackson
« Reply #408 on: March 30, 2012, 09:42:23 PM »
The only problem with Vickery's game was he lacked touch with his marking and didn't hold them.

He got to good spots and got his hands on the ball, and we know he can mark so it was just rust I reckon.
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Daniel Jackson
« Reply #409 on: March 30, 2012, 10:03:20 PM »
The only problem with Vickery's game was he lacked touch with his marking and didn't hold them.

He got to good spots and got his hands on the ball, and we know he can mark so it was just rust I reckon.

Are you saying his hands were rust buckets  ;D
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #410 on: April 25, 2012, 10:48:05 PM »
To avoid being accused of bias lol, our man Jacko turned 26 today  :birthday

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #411 on: April 25, 2012, 11:34:59 PM »
Another year closer to retirement  :clapping

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #412 on: April 29, 2012, 10:13:03 PM »
Gave the MRP a few opportunities to give him a holiday.

Reckon Webbs might get a run?

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5717
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #413 on: April 29, 2012, 10:33:05 PM »
May have found a spot in the side as a defensive forward tagging the 'quarterback' type players.

Think I can accept this. Won't be hunting ball which he tends to do in the middle and he can use his ability to run with a player well. Just don't want to see him wasting shots on goal, but of he kicks them great
Go Tigers!

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #414 on: April 29, 2012, 10:38:00 PM »
Gave the MRP a few opportunities to give him a holiday.

Reckon Webbs might get a run?

wasnt he clobbered himself, looked like hed been run over by a truck at one point
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #415 on: April 29, 2012, 10:43:07 PM »
Yeah he got cleaned up after he knocked over one of the Selwoods. He was dealing it out pretty heavily in the first half. Can't knock the bloke in that he doesn't mind copping it back  :cheers I reckon he feeds off of it.

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3811
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #416 on: April 30, 2012, 06:56:20 AM »
His hit on Selwood is going to cost him. Big critic of him but he played his best game this year. His strength got him the second goal

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #417 on: April 30, 2012, 07:54:15 AM »
His hit on Selwood is going to cost him. Big critic of him but he played his best game this year. His strength got him the second goal

improved performance yesterday.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #418 on: April 30, 2012, 08:11:32 AM »
Best game I've seen him play in I don't know how long, his clangers and stupid clown brain fades were virtually non existent, that should be his minimum standard.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Daniel Jackson [merged]
« Reply #419 on: April 30, 2012, 08:29:22 AM »
yea, he played his role ok. as we have seen with kingy, the closer you play to goal the less your poor decision making is exposed, although sometimes kingy still does his best to circumnavigate this
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI