Author Topic: Luke McGuane [merged]  (Read 46669 times)

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4802
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #360 on: August 19, 2012, 02:17:53 PM »
Does anyone else hear "Benny Hill" music any time Mcguane touches the ball.

Luke was at his comical best yesterday.
Unleash the tornado

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #361 on: August 19, 2012, 02:36:50 PM »
be nice please and stick to the subject
you still havent come up with a serviceable  pick 94 yet

Dean cox, Nathan Foley, Nick Maxwell, Tom Rockcliff, Leigh Adams, Matt Suckling, Paul Duffield, Heath Hocking, Aaron Davey, Andrew Carrazzo.........all picks 94 and above and there just off he top of my head! Would you like me to fully research it for you?

Offline tigercub2012

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 81
  • I never worry about action, but only inaction
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #362 on: August 19, 2012, 02:41:15 PM »
nice homework there is hope for your son
Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.
Winston Churchill

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #363 on: August 19, 2012, 02:52:52 PM »
be nice please and stick to the subject
you still havent come up with a serviceable  pick 94 yet

Dean cox, Nathan Foley, Nick Maxwell, Tom Rockcliff, Leigh Adams, Matt Suckling, Paul Duffield, Heath Hocking, Aaron Davey, Andrew Carrazzo.........all picks 94 and above and there just off he top of my head! Would you like me to fully research it for you?
you name the successes, now name the over 1000 failures with rookie  picks. i reckon most successful rookie picks would be mature picks as well.

i will say again late nd and rookie picks are a numbers game where you turn over heaps ( about 6 ) in the hope of finding one decent player who can do a job for you.
just my opinion but with these picks we would be better off with a mixture of kids and mature recruits about 50/50. someone like moloney would be a guarantee of decent service for two or three yrs. most rookies dont ever get to play a senior game.

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #364 on: August 19, 2012, 03:47:43 PM »
be nice please and stick to the subject
you still havent come up with a serviceable  pick 94 yet

Dean cox, Nathan Foley, Nick Maxwell, Tom Rockcliff, Leigh Adams, Matt Suckling, Paul Duffield, Heath Hocking, Aaron Davey, Andrew Carrazzo.........all picks 94 and above and there just off he top of my head! Would you like me to fully research it for you?
you name the successes, now name the over 1000 failures with rookie  picks. i reckon most successful rookie picks would be mature picks as well.

i will say again late nd and rookie picks are a numbers game where you turn over heaps ( about 6 ) in the hope of finding one decent player who can do a job for you.
just my opinion but with these picks we would be better off with a mixture of kids and mature recruits about 50/50. someone like moloney would be a guarantee of decent service for two or three yrs. most rookies dont ever get to play a senior game.

What's that got to do with O'Hanlon and in turn why is O'Hanlon being discussed in the McGuane thread?

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #365 on: August 20, 2012, 02:59:51 AM »
Do we have the YouTube of mcgaune missed goal?

Offline unplugged

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #366 on: August 20, 2012, 12:45:55 PM »
Do we have the YouTube of mcgaune missed goal?

The one where he saw Edwards and dropped the ball.  Edwards infected him.  Its contagious.  Tigers have the plague. 

How stupid is the coach playing him in the Ruck again.  If you were going to rotate anyone in the ruck, it had to be Post.  Hardwick has to go.  He is reminding me of Giesh.  Thats how bad he is.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #367 on: August 20, 2012, 01:50:39 PM »
Does anyone else hear "Benny Hill" music any time Mcguane touches the ball.

Luke was at his comical best yesterday.
Great minds think alike mat. The first thing I thought when seeing the video clip was adding "Benny Hill" music to it plus Homer's "Doh!" at the end when Luke puts his hands to his head.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #368 on: August 20, 2012, 04:42:39 PM »

Offline tigercub2012

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 81
  • I never worry about action, but only inaction
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #369 on: August 20, 2012, 04:46:45 PM »
Heath shocking pick 94 explains it all
Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.
Winston Churchill

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #370 on: August 20, 2012, 10:00:36 PM »
Do we have the YouTube of mcgaune missed goal?

The one where he saw Edwards and dropped the ball.  Edwards infected him.  Its contagious.  Tigers have the plague. 

How stupid is the coach playing him in the Ruck again.  If you were going to rotate anyone in the ruck, it had to be Post.  Hardwick has to go.  He is reminding me of Giesh.  Thats how bad he is.

But with Griff down who goes back? I agree Post would've been best choice outside of the circumstances but with only 2 tall backs, if one went into the ruck that'll leave one. Unless you put McGuane in the backline as post rucks....

Offline unplugged

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #371 on: August 21, 2012, 12:34:48 AM »
But with Griff down who goes back? I agree Post would've been best choice outside of the circumstances but with only 2 tall backs, if one went into the ruck that'll leave one. Unless you put McGuane in the backline as post rucks....

I agree but if you are winning the clearances, there isn't as much pressure on the back-line and the delivery into the forward line is so much more fluid.  Hardwick denied our midfield a contest in the Ruck.  Then he cried about the dominance of Sandilands after the game. You can't cry about a situation that you made happen.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #372 on: August 21, 2012, 06:25:37 AM »
Do we have the YouTube of mcgaune missed goal?

The one where he saw Edwards and dropped the ball.  Edwards infected him.  Its contagious.  Tigers have the plague. 

How stupid is the coach playing him in the Ruck again.  If you were going to rotate anyone in the ruck, it had to be Post.  Hardwick has to go.  He is reminding me of Giesh.  Thats how bad he is.

But with Griff down who goes back? I agree Post would've been best choice outside of the circumstances but with only 2 tall backs, if one went into the ruck that'll leave one. Unless you put McGuane in the backline as post rucks....

Maybe Astbury will get a run?

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #373 on: August 21, 2012, 10:10:18 AM »
l seen some funny stuff on Saturday but l was not laughing. Every other team supporter will be forever reminding us of this lad. Clearly he is now worthless & no other team will ever want to see this lad. Send him to Leongatha.  :rollin

Offline JVT

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: Luke McGuane [merged]
« Reply #374 on: August 21, 2012, 10:12:23 AM »
l seen some funny stuff on Saturday but l was not laughing. Every other team supporter will be forever reminding us of this lad. Clearly he is now worthless & no other team will ever want to see this lad. Send him to Leongatha.  :rollin
Was worthless prior to this game anyway ;)