what do you think of this.
Richmond : trade pick 2 for pick 3 gain morton ( WC ) swap our picks 19 and 35 with ( CARL ) for 20 and 36 and we get either walker, simpson, or carrazzo )
Result : picks 3 , 18 , 20 , 36 , 51 , 67 plus morton and either walker, simpson, or carrazzo.
Carlton : gain pick 2 from ( RICH ), swap there picks 20 and 36 for ( RICH ) picks 19 and 35 and either walker, simpson, or carrazzo to ( RICH )
pick 2 and 19 plus a player (say kennedy to West Coast )
Result : picks 1 , 35 ,51 , 68 plus Judd
West Coast : gain picks 2 and 20 plus a player (say kennedy) and morton to ( RICH )
Result : 2, 13 , 19, 30, 46, 62, 78 and a player (say kennedy)
* NOTE : while i personally dont want the tigers to play any part in the judd going to any other victorian club, but for us to get him via PSD.
im not a big wrap for morton to the tigers, but i think its a morale.
but us giving up pick 2 allows (WC) to get C. Morton or Cotchin. We would get who they dont pick ( nothing lost there ).
By swapping picks with carlton we get either walker, simpson, or carrazzo, wouldnt think it changes too much with our original selections.
What do you think ?