Author Topic: Jordan McMahon  (Read 36425 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100744
    • One-Eyed Richmond

Offline {X}

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1818
Re: Jordan McMahon
« Reply #31 on: October 11, 2007, 06:24:39 AM »
someone stop this frikken nightmare

if this is miller thinking we are being "active" he is wrong, he is planting a bomb at tigerland and out to destroy us

Passionfruit

  • Guest
Reported 1m for 3 years.
We are ratpooh if this is true.
We are being run by idiots if this is the case


Looks like its true,as per todays Herald Sun. 1m for 3 years ::)

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Jordan McMahon
« Reply #33 on: October 11, 2007, 06:46:33 AM »
this is rubbish the Board and the President should VETO all this poo.

Gordon Bennett

  • Guest
Reported 1m for 3 years.
We are ratpooh if this is true.
We are being run by idiots if this is the case


Looks like its true,as per todays Herald Sun. 1m for 3 years ::)
They said "lucrative". That is not proof that your figure is "true". People should not take what you say as gospel, because your credibility is severely damaged following your many comments about Wallace walking and Sheedy definitely coaching somewhere next year.

Offline DallasCrane

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
  • roll on 2011
Re: Jordan McMahon
« Reply #35 on: October 11, 2007, 09:58:22 AM »
If the Dogs want to remain in the 2nd round of the draft, they can have our pick 30 that we will get off WCE, not 18.

I would make McMahon's contract conditional on losing his pathetic moustache.
Experience is a good school. But the fees are high.
Heinrich Heine

Online wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8553
  • In Absentia
Re: Jordan McMahon
« Reply #36 on: October 11, 2007, 10:05:58 AM »
If the Dogs want to remain in the 2nd round of the draft, they can have our pick 30 that we will get off WCE, not 18.

I would make McMahon's contract conditional on losing his pathetic moustache.

lol

Careful he might find you and go 'loco'.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline tiga

  • Exhaling Carbon in the
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Yes Hampson has taken a mark!
Re: Jordan McMahon
« Reply #37 on: October 11, 2007, 10:08:37 AM »
McMahon isn't as bad as people make out. Last season he had 30 & 22 possies against the premiers and had double figure possies
in every game except for one. I'm not saying that posessions are the only indicator to a players performance but at least he gets his hands
on the pill and his delivery is actually pretty sound. Well a lot better than some of our existing players. Sure he's not a muscle man but he sweeps the backline well and is capable of moving forward to kick goals if need be.

Offline blaisee

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1359
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jordan McMahon
« Reply #38 on: October 11, 2007, 10:20:45 AM »
LOL at jack and his football knowledge

Shultz according to jack is the worst player in the afl, but chocco wants him, I reckon chocco knows a bit more about football then you do mate ::)

Mcmahon is one of the best kicks in the afl, we would be lucky to get him'

cant please some fans, complain about a lack of skill, yet still complain when we try and recruit quick skillful players

oh well thankfully rfc make their own decisions are not swayed by disgruntled ex employees with not so "hidden" agendas
 :sleep

Offline DallasCrane

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
  • roll on 2011
Re: Jordan McMahon
« Reply #39 on: October 11, 2007, 10:33:41 AM »
Did anyone actually see McMahon in the 2nd half of the season, his kicking was atrocious, his decision making was awful, something is wrong...
Experience is a good school. But the fees are high.
Heinrich Heine

Offline DallasCrane

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
  • roll on 2011
Re: Jordan McMahon
« Reply #40 on: October 11, 2007, 10:34:13 AM »
If the Dogs want to remain in the 2nd round of the draft, they can have our pick 30 that we will get off WCE, not 18.

I would make McMahon's contract conditional on losing his pathetic moustache.

lol

Careful he might find you and go 'loco'.


Loco?
Experience is a good school. But the fees are high.
Heinrich Heine

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Jordan McMahon
« Reply #41 on: October 11, 2007, 10:36:28 AM »
Did anyone actually see McMahon in the 2nd half of the season, his kicking was atrocious, his decision making was awful, something is wrong...

I did and his disposal last season wasnt the best.

Offline mjs

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 497
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jordan McMahon
« Reply #42 on: October 11, 2007, 11:39:28 AM »
Did anyone actually see McMahon in the 2nd half of the season, his kicking was atrocious, his decision making was awful, something is wrong...

I did and his disposal last season wasnt the best.

fwiw I asked a friend who goes to every Bulldogs game what they thought of him

quote " hmm, he runs very fast and kicks poorly"

However three teams want him - Bullies, Port and us - so he has value.

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Jordan McMahon
« Reply #43 on: October 11, 2007, 11:55:25 AM »
Did anyone actually see McMahon in the 2nd half of the season, his kicking was atrocious, his decision making was awful, something is wrong...

I did and his disposal last season wasnt the best.

fwiw I asked a friend who goes to every Bulldogs game what they thought of him

quote " hmm, he runs very fast and kicks poorly"

However three teams want him - Bullies, Port and us - so he has value.

Done deal then.  He'll fit right in.   :shh
EAT EM ALIVE!

Online wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8553
  • In Absentia
Re: Jordan McMahon
« Reply #44 on: October 11, 2007, 12:10:35 PM »
If the Dogs want to remain in the 2nd round of the draft, they can have our pick 30 that we will get off WCE, not 18.

I would make McMahon's contract conditional on losing his pathetic moustache.

lol

Careful he might find you and go 'loco'.


 

Loco?

His moustache reminds me of a Latino...

Loco
etim. Spanish for "crazy", "insane", "mad".
Ese tío está loco
("That guy's crazy")


 :lol
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do