Author Topic: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get  (Read 3930 times)

Offline {X}

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1818
so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« on: October 10, 2007, 05:31:11 PM »
this is what i wanna know.


judd is apparantly gone to the bues, we wont get kruezer as this blues will

miller said we will be very active, but maybe he has beenm talking his usual sh it  and we will get no one

brock mclean is still out of contract, was supposed to sign up again at melb today but heard nothing

cant believe wce have caved in, ffs our offer was better

as usual at rfc we are all bark no bite , too much sizzle but no stuffing sausage


Offline Rodgerramjet

  • OER - CONTRIBUTOR
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2001
  • Never cast pearls before swine.
Re: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2007, 05:33:51 PM »
Mate there wasn't a lot we could do we had to sit and wait. If West Coast have caved then that's their weakness not ours.
The lips of Wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding.

Offline {X}

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1818
Re: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2007, 05:41:28 PM »
Mate there wasn't a lot we could do we had to sit and wait. If West Coast have caved then that's their weakness not ours.

true but we have been hearing the last month from blaisee etx that we are getting some bigtime player

common blaisee speak up

Offline rogerd3

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2007, 05:45:57 PM »
what have we got to trade in the first place apart from a bag of marbles, miller has stated on afl. that things are pretty quiet....

happy to keep the picks and stay on the path we have chosen.



Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2007, 05:52:15 PM »
maybe Fevola is comming over  ;D & we eff Useless Shultz off  ;D

Offline {X}

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1818
Re: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« Reply #5 on: October 10, 2007, 05:53:46 PM »
fev wont come

but this is how it will go

pick 1 kruezer to carlscum

pick 2 morton to us

pick 3 cotchin to wce

so the blues get what they want

wce get what they want

we get screwed

Offline rogerd3

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2007, 05:54:49 PM »
fev wont come

but this is how it will go

pick 1 kruezer to carlscum

pick 2 morton to us

pick 3 cotchin to wce

so the blues get what they want

wce get what they want

we get screwed

why do we get screwed?

Offline {X}

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1818
Re: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2007, 06:02:06 PM »
fev wont come

but this is how it will go

pick 1 kruezer to carlscum

pick 2 morton to us

pick 3 cotchin to wce

so the blues get what they want

wce get what they want

we get screwed

why do we get screwed?

because we could have had judd or kruezer

thats why

wce still would have got cotchin at pick 2

so as bull stated in another thread, wce betetr give us mitch for nothing and the morton boys better live up to their dads reputation

and lets hope we get dowler or boyle for meyer and that mclean falls through to the psd

iwe also get screwed cos the system sucks and has favoured the blues . we finished last and they get judd

f the afl, and f that old rich bastard pratt

Offline {X}

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1818
Re: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2007, 06:04:47 PM »
lets hope the psd has a gun in there, cos if it dosnt we have got f all out of this equalisation draft process

i hope judd breaks down, lets hope connors has the balls to snap his knee ! money hungry lying prick

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2007, 06:48:37 PM »
If we got 16 for Schulz then we have 2 16 18 19 35 and 51 - 4 picks in top 20 not bad at all. Although I expect Morton will cost us 19 and get us 30. At this stage, Id be keeping the picks and trying to get another pick as well if if possible inside the top 20.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2007, 06:58:24 PM »
If we do smart recruiting then that's a good result IMO. Getting a big name in the PSD would be a bonus but if no big name other than Judd wants to leave their club then there's no much the RFC can do. We've still got our picks (slightly better picks after the Schulz trade) so now that Judd is out the way let's just continue drafting and developing our own players. Pick 16 may get us Scott Selwood now as Geelong with Pick 17 were interested in him.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Bull

  • Guest
Re: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« Reply #11 on: October 10, 2007, 07:02:45 PM »
thats the problem MT, there is no confidence in our recruiting.

I hope that it is on the money, but the record isnt good.

Passionfruit

  • Guest
Re: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« Reply #12 on: October 10, 2007, 07:03:41 PM »
Straunnie is headed to Punt Road ::)

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« Reply #13 on: October 10, 2007, 07:05:13 PM »
Straunnie is headed to Punt Road ::)

not happy jacko...if we got 16 for schulz that should of made your day.

Passionfruit

  • Guest
Re: so who is the big name player we were supposed to get
« Reply #14 on: October 10, 2007, 07:11:32 PM »
If we get pick 16 for Schultz is would be like winning Tattslotto.
Schultz for pick 16  ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)