Author Topic: 2008 Non-Richmond games  (Read 31768 times)

Offline julzqld

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3915
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2008 Non-Richmond games
« Reply #60 on: March 03, 2008, 02:06:04 PM »
And Collingwood still haven't won a game this year :lol

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58590
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: 2008 Non-Richmond games
« Reply #61 on: March 08, 2008, 09:12:49 PM »
The Crows look to have found a couple of talented young forwards. Sellar in the earlier NAB games and Tippet tonight. Goalkicking is a bit suspect but both have good hands and footy smarts.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58590
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: 2008 Non-Richmond games
« Reply #62 on: March 22, 2008, 02:42:42 PM »
Nice hip and shoulder by Rocca on Tarrant lol.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58590
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: 2008 Non-Richmond games
« Reply #63 on: March 22, 2008, 08:30:12 PM »
3 attacking free flowing games and then we cop this crap from Sydney mainly flooding and shutting down the game and St Kilda copying it :chuck
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58590
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: 2008 Non-Richmond games
« Reply #64 on: March 23, 2008, 03:50:32 PM »
Doggies won a goal-a-thon by 3 points. Brad Johnson kicking the winning goal in his 300th  :clapping. Sheesh every game has been close so far. Shows how even the comp is.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: 2008 Non-Richmond games
« Reply #65 on: March 24, 2008, 05:02:33 PM »
To all the doubters on here, Bombers did look ok today

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7355
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: 2008 Non-Richmond games
« Reply #66 on: March 24, 2008, 05:07:28 PM »
To all the doubters on here, Bombers did look ok today

Take it to Bomberblitz Jack - DGAF

Moi

  • Guest
Re: 2008 Non-Richmond games
« Reply #67 on: March 24, 2008, 05:16:09 PM »
To all the doubters on here, Bombers did look ok today
WGAF

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: 2008 Non-Richmond games
« Reply #68 on: March 24, 2008, 05:40:21 PM »
Good coach they have too :thumbsup

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58590
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: 2008 Non-Richmond games
« Reply #69 on: March 24, 2008, 05:58:54 PM »
To all the doubters on here, Bombers did look ok today
Lucas will be a big loss though. Out for half the year.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: 2008 Non-Richmond games
« Reply #70 on: March 24, 2008, 06:40:30 PM »
You have to admit, the way they played today was good..
Fast, play on style etc Alot like Knighta played himself

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: Rich v Norf
« Reply #71 on: March 24, 2008, 06:42:20 PM »
Both North and the Bummers were crap today. If we can keep the skills ok and maintain the intensity we showed in the second half against Carlton neither of these teams should cause us much of a problem. Of course if we go back to playing like the first half against Carlton then we will be beaten and deserve to be 16th.

Bummers crap ::) ::) ::) You are kidding. You would have to more intoxicated than Kane Johnson if you think that :cheers

richmondrules

  • Guest
Re: Rich v Norf
« Reply #72 on: March 24, 2008, 06:47:22 PM »
Both North and the Bummers were crap today. If we can keep the skills ok and maintain the intensity we showed in the second half against Carlton neither of these teams should cause us much of a problem. Of course if we go back to playing like the first half against Carlton then we will be beaten and deserve to be 16th.

Bummers crap ::) ::) ::) You are kidding. You would have to more intoxicated than Kane Johnson if you think that :cheers

Whatever Jackstar, I'm sure you know best.

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: Rich v Norf
« Reply #73 on: March 24, 2008, 07:11:07 PM »
What amazes me on this forum that a lot of people(experts) think that the other 15 teams are crap. Hate to tell you this, we are crap, you dont win wooden spoons for the sake of it.
Todays game at the dome was the one of  quickest game you would  see.
If you experts know anything about football, Carlton dropped away badly in the second half against us.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58590
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Rich v Norf
« Reply #74 on: March 24, 2008, 07:57:47 PM »
North fell away as badly as Carlton if you're going to make excuses. The funny is both games were similar where the team that won was down by 4 goals early on before kicking 90% of the remaining goals. Yet we are crap yet Essendon are brilliant  ::).
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd