Author Topic: Wallace on SEN  (Read 15475 times)

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #60 on: March 15, 2008, 02:57:30 PM »
Im just sad that TAB Sportsbets arent taking bets on whether Richmond supporters will be going ape droppings by R11 not only on where we are on the ladder but why we have McMahon and why we DONT have Scott Selwood.

The bet should read as follows.

McMahon 12 games or more at Coburg  $1.33
             11 at each                         $2.00
             12 games or more at Richmond $3.15

Although this will become embrassing for the RFC, they will have to play him regardless of performance, hey look on the brightside, the reason they got him as they wont have to been seen as tanking if they keep playing him, mate, he cannot play and its an absolute disgrace that Selwood aint at Punt Road.
Most of the dreamers on this website dont realise this, hey if you thought Patty Bowden was as skunk, this guy is worse.

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #61 on: March 15, 2008, 03:00:32 PM »
Not even going to bothered answering you Moi
You have little idea, I shouldnt even bother replying to anything you write, and I wont anymore
Sorry you will have to respond when I ask you to hand over the $100 at the end of the year.
Until then do as you wish lol


The sun will go down tonite
The sun will come up in  morning
You will be paying me the $100 as RFC have no chance of being above the Bombers at years end,.
I will not be replying to any more of your posts till then,  not going to waste my time arguing with idiots

You are dreaming
Are you saying you wouldn't pay?

Moi

  • Guest
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #62 on: March 15, 2008, 03:12:06 PM »
Not even going to bothered answering you Moi
You have little idea, I shouldnt even bother replying to anything you write, and I wont anymore
Sorry you will have to respond when I ask you to hand over the $100 at the end of the year.
Until then do as you wish lol


The sun will go down tonite
The sun will come up in  morning
You will be paying me the $100 as RFC have no chance of being above the Bombers at years end,.
I will not be replying to any more of your posts till then,  not going to waste my time arguing with idiots

You are dreaming
Are you saying you wouldn't pay?
So you'd welsh on a bet
Fine, but let it be known I would have coughed up.
You obviously have no faith in what you say.

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #63 on: March 15, 2008, 03:16:52 PM »
$100, I dont think $100 is hardly going too break my bank dear ::)
Anyway, not going to lose it am I!

Moi

  • Guest
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #64 on: March 15, 2008, 03:40:06 PM »
$100, I dont think $100 is hardly going too break my bank dear ::)
Anyway, not going to lose it am I!
We'll see.

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14051
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #65 on: March 15, 2008, 05:07:45 PM »
every time im gonna see selwood play ill think of miller and his pathetic lure of this mcmahon dud to punt road.
pathetic
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline blaisee

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #66 on: March 15, 2008, 06:29:03 PM »
Im just sad that TAB Sportsbets arent taking bets on whether Richmond supporters will be going ape droppings by R11 not only on where we are on the ladder but why we have McMahon and why we DONT have Scott Selwood.

The bet should read as follows.

McMahon 12 games or more at Coburg  $1.33
             11 at each                         $2.00
             12 games or more at Richmond $3.15

Although this will become embrassing for the RFC, they will have to play him regardless of performance, hey look on the brightside, the reason they got him as they wont have to been seen as tanking if they keep playing him, mate, he cannot play and its an absolute disgrace that Selwood aint at Punt Road.
Most of the dreamers on this website dont realise this, hey if you thought Patty Bowden was as skunk, this guy is worse.


3.15 to play more than 12 games at richmond. geez jack, if you have the nuts I am happy to invest a guerilla.

Have you got the balls ...or just like everything else..you are full of crap ::)

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #67 on: March 15, 2008, 06:48:47 PM »
3.15 to play more than 12 games at richmond. geez jack, if you have the nuts I am happy to invest a guerilla.

Have you got the balls ...or just like everything else..you are full of crap ::)
Me AND my punters club are also very very very interested in these odds.  If we can get on can you please let us know?

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #68 on: March 15, 2008, 07:40:42 PM »
Im just sad that TAB Sportsbets arent taking bets on whether Richmond supporters will be going ape droppings by R11 not only on where we are on the ladder but why we have McMahon and why we DONT have Scott Selwood.

The bet should read as follows.

McMahon 12 games or more at Coburg  $1.33
             11 at each                         $2.00
             12 games or more at Richmond $3.15

Although this will become embrassing for the RFC, they will have to play him regardless of performance, hey look on the brightside, the reason they got him as they wont have to been seen as tanking if they keep playing him, mate, he cannot play and its an absolute disgrace that Selwood aint at Punt Road.
Most of the dreamers on this website dont realise this, hey if you thought Patty Bowden was as skunk, this guy is worse.


3.15 to play more than 12 games at richmond. geez jack, if you have the nuts I am happy to invest a guerilla.

Have you got the balls ...or just like everything else..you are full of crap ::)

Lets judge McMahon on how well he plays shall we. How many Bronlow Votes will he get and how well will he votes in the media best player voting. Lets also judge how Scott Selwood goes and who the supporters would of liked to have had at Punt Rd going forward.

Getting games is not a correct criteria. There have been plenty of very average footballers get games at RFC over the past 25 years Blaisee and you know it.

So how about you tell us how well McMahon will go in the brownlow count and in the media vote counts.

Offline Fishfinger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2465
  • You can't put brains in an idiot
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #69 on: March 15, 2008, 07:59:13 PM »
Lets judge McMahon on how well he plays shall we.
Good call.  :thumbsup

Have you considered practicing what you preach?   ;)
It's 50 of one and half a dozen of the other - Don Scott

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #70 on: March 15, 2008, 08:03:31 PM »
Im just sad that TAB Sportsbets arent taking bets on whether Richmond supporters will be going ape droppings by R11 not only on where we are on the ladder but why we have McMahon and why we DONT have Scott Selwood.

The bet should read as follows.

McMahon 12 games or more at Coburg  $1.33
             11 at each                         $2.00
             12 games or more at Richmond $3.15

Although this will become embrassing for the RFC, they will have to play him regardless of performance, hey look on the brightside, the reason they got him as they wont have to been seen as tanking if they keep playing him, mate, he cannot play and its an absolute disgrace that Selwood aint at Punt Road.
Most of the dreamers on this website dont realise this, hey if you thought Patty Bowden was as skunk, this guy is worse.


3.15 to play more than 12 games at richmond. geez jack, if you have the nuts I am happy to invest a guerilla.

Have you got the balls ...or just like everything else..you are full of crap ::)

You obviously arent a punter, no mention of a quinella there.
There the odds sports bet should be offering on this dud.
By the way, if you think he can play, you are totally deluded.
I actually watched him play at Werribee last year and he is a disgrace, he is worse than Patty Bowden, oh yeah, they have all swept Patty Bowden under the carpet havent they. I actually been to his restaurant a few times, Num num Birdies, well named lol
By the way, I have got the balls, I punt well beyond my means

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #71 on: March 15, 2008, 08:05:49 PM »
Lets judge McMahon on how well he plays shall we.
Good call.  :thumbsup

Have you considered practicing what you preach?   ;)
Forget about that, seen him 8  time slast year at Dogs and Werribbee, is a disgrace!
If you all thought Patty Bowden was bad,wait till you get to know this lightweight :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #72 on: March 15, 2008, 08:05:59 PM »
Lets judge McMahon on how well he plays shall we.
Good call.  :thumbsup

Have you considered practicing what you preach?   ;)

Dont need to, I have a fair idea whats gonna happen. Blaisee was trying to lower the level of the bar in terms of McMahon and I just put it back where it should be. The question is 1 and only 1.

At R22 of 2008 will Richmond supporters be happy with McMahon or will they be raging with anger if Scott Selwood is playing well? thats it. Thats the criteria.

Moi

  • Guest
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #73 on: March 15, 2008, 08:06:28 PM »

Little Jackie

  • Guest
Re: Wallace on SEN
« Reply #74 on: March 15, 2008, 08:14:19 PM »
Lets judge McMahon on how well he plays shall we.
Good call.  :thumbsup

Have you considered practicing what you preach?   ;)

Dont need to, I have a fair idea whats gonna happen. Blaisee was trying to lower the level of the bar in terms of McMahon and I just put it back where it should be. The question is 1 and only 1.

At R22 of 2008 will Richmond supporters be happy with McMahon or will they be raging with anger if Scott Selwood is playing well? thats it. Thats the criteria.

McMahon has been in the system long enough too know that he cant play, just one person who happens to be an Ex Coach thinks he can perform miracles ala Patty Bowden.
Tell you something funny, when Wallet first came to Richmond, he was hell bent on trying to get Mark Alvey, the supporters would of rioted, this isnt much different I am afraid.