Author Topic: matty KNIGHTS [merged]  (Read 20033 times)

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #90 on: May 24, 2009, 08:16:11 PM »
Loved Knights as a player and would love to have him back at the Tiges.

However LMAO at him having achieved anything, what a load of pigs swill.

Offline the_boy_jake

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1770
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #91 on: May 24, 2009, 08:55:12 PM »
i must be stupid, i dont get it

Sorry mate, I mistook you for X.

Let me explain. And since X is no longer a member and you are not X, I am not breaking any site rules by the following summary.

Now I don't know how long you were reading this site for before you mustered the energy to sign up, but it seems quite a while. X was a strange character. Part village idiot, part village people. A flamboyantly gay, angry midget who used to frequent these parts.

Once again, my sincere apologies. Thank god for everyone that you are not X.

Offline 2JD

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #92 on: May 24, 2009, 08:59:35 PM »
So many genius's - Don't think many bagged Knighter, but what he had ahead of him!
Atm looks like many of us were wrong, hope you really enjoy being right. :banghead
And if you r so effen smart how come u guys rnt coaching? ohh that's right ur just smartars guessworkers and take the credit when you are right and dissapear when ur wrong.

Same song and dance  :sleep


 :clapping Hit the nail on the head! Bit like Hutchy, big song and dance when they can claim a right guess....tumbleweeds down the main street for a while if they are wrong.
They are just like all of us on here, arm chair experts but for some reason they think they are more expert than the rest of us  :bow

Jackstar is back

  • Guest
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #93 on: May 24, 2009, 09:03:54 PM »
Tell you that Hutchy is on the money.
Problem is the people hate the truth.
Wait and see what the punt road circus dishes up this week. ::) :banghead :banghead

Moi

  • Guest
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #94 on: May 24, 2009, 09:59:59 PM »
Tell you that Hutchy is on the money.
Problem is the people hate the truth.
Wait and see what the punt road circus dishes up this week. ::) :banghead :banghead
We're waiting Jack
Gee wizz, Scoop, you're onto it again  :rollin
 ::)

Moi

  • Guest
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #95 on: May 24, 2009, 10:08:03 PM »
i must be stupid, i dont get it

Sorry mate, I mistook you for X.

Let me explain. And since X is no longer a member and you are not X, I am not breaking any site rules by the following summary.

Now I don't know how long you were reading this site for before you mustered the energy to sign up, but it seems quite a while. X was a strange character. Part village idiot, part village people. A flamboyantly gay, angry midget who used to frequent these parts.

Once again, my sincere apologies. Thank god for everyone that you are not X.
Who was a devotee of Kiss  ;)
 :rollin

Offline DallasCrane

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
  • roll on 2011
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #96 on: May 24, 2009, 10:11:06 PM »
i must be stupid, i dont get it

Sorry mate, I mistook you for X.

Let me explain. And since X is no longer a member and you are not X, I am not breaking any site rules by the following summary.

Now I don't know how long you were reading this site for before you mustered the energy to sign up, but it seems quite a while. X was a strange character. Part village idiot, part village people. A flamboyantly gay, angry midget who used to frequent these parts.

Once again, my sincere apologies. Thank god for everyone that you are not X.

 :lol

I think X once described himself as the perfect physical specimen, I don't know where you got the idea that he was a midget!!
Experience is a good school. But the fees are high.
Heinrich Heine

Moi

  • Guest
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #97 on: May 24, 2009, 10:18:10 PM »
i must be stupid, i dont get it

Sorry mate, I mistook you for X.

Let me explain. And since X is no longer a member and you are not X, I am not breaking any site rules by the following summary.

Now I don't know how long you were reading this site for before you mustered the energy to sign up, but it seems quite a while. X was a strange character. Part village idiot, part village people. A flamboyantly gay, angry midget who used to frequent these parts.

Once again, my sincere apologies. Thank god for everyone that you are not X.

 :lol

I think X once described himself as the perfect physical specimen
But he would wouldn't he lol
If he is I am too  :nope

Online the wasp

  • Tiger Rookie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #98 on: May 24, 2009, 10:19:08 PM »
i must be stupid, i dont get it

Sorry mate, I mistook you for X.

Let me explain. And since X is no longer a member and you are not X, I am not breaking any site rules by the following summary.

Now I don't know how long you were reading this site for before you mustered the energy to sign up, but it seems quite a while. X was a strange character. Part village idiot, part village people. A flamboyantly gay, angry midget who used to frequent these parts.

Once again, my sincere apologies. Thank god for everyone that you are not X.

LMAO

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #99 on: May 24, 2009, 11:17:06 PM »
I admit I was critical of the Bombers picking Knights as head coach and I maintain at the time he wasn't the highest credentialled coach available to them. He never had any success as a player or a coach and at the end of the day he still hasn't won anything worthwhile yet. Let's see how they go when Lloyd retires and they have no forward line, not much there other than Gumbleton who can't get on the park and Neagle is a hack.

He only got the job over Hardwick because he sold the board the belief that the team was ahead of where everyone else said they were. They have had a lot of very early picks in the past few years though so there will be some quality coming through, but remember they started well last year too and it didn't end the season that well.

Offline TigerTime

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 968
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #100 on: May 25, 2009, 09:09:36 AM »
i must be stupid, i dont get it

Sorry mate, I mistook you for X.

Let me explain. And since X is no longer a member and you are not X, I am not breaking any site rules by the following summary.

Now I don't know how long you were reading this site for before you mustered the energy to sign up, but it seems quite a while. X was a strange character. Part village idiot, part village people. A flamboyantly gay, angry midget who used to frequent these parts.

Once again, my sincere apologies. Thank god for everyone that you are not X.

 :lol

I think X once described himself as the perfect physical specimen
But he would wouldn't he lol
If he is I am too  :nope


maybe you two are perfect for each other  :rollin :lol :rollin :lol

Moi

  • Guest
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #101 on: May 25, 2009, 09:27:50 AM »
maybe you two are perfect for each other  :rollin :lol :rollin :lol
There were three of us who commented  :wallywink
Woohoo a threesome hahaha

 ;)


Offline TigerTime

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 968
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #102 on: May 25, 2009, 09:42:04 AM »
maybe you two are perfect for each other  :rollin :lol :rollin :lol
There were three of us who commented  :wallywink
Woohoo a threesome hahaha

 ;)



kinky!  or is this afl culture lol u may want jackstar to join in lol  oh this afl/nrl culture lol

Offline 1980

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #103 on: May 25, 2009, 10:07:32 AM »

Everyone was wrong about Matty Knights except the Essendon hierarchy. It was one of the biggest shock appointments I've seen given he was replacing the biggest coaching shoes in AFL in Sheeds (based on years of service).

How did Essendon get it so right? He was in their system and they knew first hand what he was capable of.

And that speaks volumes to me. Matthew Knights was in the Bombers system and not ours because Wayne Campbell stabbed him in the back. Whether the club didnt want to groom him or whether he was so jarred at how the club treated him, the fact is that along with Malthouse & Sheedy, the club has yet again let another potential premiership coach slip out of its structure.

I have no doubt at this point Knights will be a successful coach. He has no fear, he backs himself, his tactics and his team, and he isnt afraid to talk straight.

It makes me loathe the people that run this club no end that they're too busy infighting, politicking and leaking decade after decade to break the vicious circle. Knights has been lost to us for the same reason Malthouse was. 






Offline blaisee

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1350
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: matty KNIGHTS
« Reply #104 on: May 25, 2009, 11:31:39 AM »

Everyone was wrong about Matty Knights except the Essendon hierarchy. It was one of the biggest shock appointments I've seen given he was replacing the biggest coaching shoes in AFL in Sheeds (based on years of service).

How did Essendon get it so right? He was in their system and they knew first hand what he was capable of.

And that speaks volumes to me. Matthew Knights was in the Bombers system and not ours because Wayne Campbell stabbed him in the back. Whether the club didnt want to groom him or whether he was so jarred at how the club treated him, the fact is that along with Malthouse & Sheedy, the club has yet again let another potential premiership coach slip out of its structure.

I have no doubt at this point Knights will be a successful coach. He has no fear, he backs himself, his tactics and his team, and he isnt afraid to talk straight.

It makes me loathe the people that run this club no end that they're too busy infighting, politicking and leaking decade after decade to break the vicious circle. Knights has been lost to us for the same reason Malthouse was. 







youve gotta be kidding 1980

Knights has done what he had to do and paid his dues as a coach, he failed at port adelaide and failed at the bendigo bombers as well. One thing he did do though was learn from his failures, he is a much better coach now from learning his trade at different environments than if he stayed at Richmond.

If Knights is such a loyal servant of the tigers he will come back. He will hone his skills and come back when the time is right. Probably In three years time when we screw over our latest coach. Hopefully people wont be hammering Knights ( just like you have Malthouse and Sheedy ) for not coming back and rebuilding richmond, when you and I both know that having the right infrastructure around the coach is just as imprtant as having the right coach. By infrastructure I mean strong board, great development prgramme, elite facilities and elite recruiting network, basically I mean $$$$$$$$. The bombers have money and up until this year we didnt. So basically when you add that to our poor culture we had/have no chance.

I hope and prey he makes a success of his career at essendon. If he does that it will be one for the hsitory books, I cant remember a player from a perenially unachieving club going on to beoming a premiership coach. Would be a huge story and good luck to him.

YOu cant blame Campbell for that. And I hate Campbell