Author Topic: The aftermath  (Read 4684 times)

Offline {X}

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1818
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #15 on: April 27, 2008, 09:47:40 PM »
hey monk
thusty played on williams
mguane was on roughead who did benefit from bad umpiring

sorry got them mixed up  :-[

shes ok monk. they are all skinny blondes lol

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #16 on: April 27, 2008, 09:49:32 PM »
Loss but proud.
Gave it a red hot go.
Our intencity and pressure was there and that instance in the last quarter where the ball was in our half forward line in the last quarter and we could have had at least 4 or 5 holding the balls but the ump forgot to blow his whistle was just superb, and even though the ball spilt to the Hawks and they goaled I was so so proud of the lads.


Yes McMahon is set to become the supporters whipping boy to an extent after tonight.


Yes l bet Umpire #10 had that whistle & wouldnot blow it cause his the biggest cheat in the AFL & we had many frees in that instance of play

McMahon seriously everyone watch the replay of this game & see how clearly this idiot thinks, his decision making & chip kicking is shocking & causing turnovers so many times l felt like jumping the fence & dragging him off the ground myself till Wallace finally done it  >:(

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #17 on: April 27, 2008, 09:53:41 PM »
hey monk
thusty played on williams
mguane was on roughead who did benefit from bad umpiring

sorry got them mixed up  :-[

shes ok monk. they are all skinny blondes lol

The backline did ok today they need a few more games
But having that idiot McMahon taking the kickouts is the worst decision
A huge kicker is needed to pump it out at least 60 metres cause our decision making is shocking
l blame the coach for that

Offline jezza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #18 on: April 27, 2008, 10:15:12 PM »
Thought we were pretty terrible in general and were lucky the Hawks had such an off day in front of goal.

We struggled all over the ground because players weren't working hard enough to present, which meant he overused the handball and turned it over regularly. Kick-ins were especially poor in regards to presenting options.

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #19 on: April 27, 2008, 10:19:13 PM »
Dont know what game you were watching but Hawthorn played bad cause we put the preasure on them & made them make bad decisions so l dont know where you get we played terrible
go watch the game again you will find how they won it with Umpire #10 help all day

Offline jezza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #20 on: April 27, 2008, 10:28:14 PM »
Sure some of the mistakes made by Hawthorn were due to pressure, but a hell of a lot weren't. They dropped a ton of uncontested chest marks, missed a heap of set shots.

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #21 on: April 27, 2008, 10:39:29 PM »
Not like them is it so what would you put that down too

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95465
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #22 on: April 28, 2008, 08:07:57 PM »
Why did we over-handball?

King - Simply Hawthorn's pressure. Thet forced us into things we didn't want to do. That's the Hawthorn way.

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13532
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #23 on: April 28, 2008, 08:18:09 PM »
hey monk
thusty played on williams
mguane was on roughead who did benefit from bad umpiring

sorry got them mixed up  :-[

shes ok monk. they are all skinny blondes lol

The backline did ok today they need a few more games
But having that idiot McMahon taking the kickouts is the worst decision
A huge kicker is needed to pump it out at least 60 metres cause our decision making is shocking
l blame the coach for that

someone will prob blast me for saying this but we were 5 points in front and had all the momentum and what does mcmahon do kick it straight to a contest we could not win.
result hawks goal.

game over

Can the RFC recruit someone who can FCUKIN kick over 50 metres out of defence?

coast to coast is our biggest concern and we r so poo at it
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline TFL

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 843
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #24 on: April 28, 2008, 09:29:29 PM »
Our kick outs really annoyed me last night, how many times did we have someone free about 40m out and we kicked it to an even contest about 55m out.  :banghead :banghead

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 57995
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #25 on: April 28, 2008, 10:06:47 PM »
We don't use the new rule with the kick-ins. Simple as that. The argument for it would be that we are one of the best sides for scoring coast to coast and it drags the opposition away from our forward line. However now and then we miss opportunities by not kicking in straight away after a point and miss out on getting the ball outside defensive 50 easily. Also when we stuff the kick-in up we turn over the ball close to the opposition goal and gift them goals.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Lozza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1679
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #26 on: April 28, 2008, 10:27:14 PM »
Our intensity and pressure was there and that instance in the last quarter where the ball was in our half forward line in the last quarter and we could have had at least 4 or 5 holding the balls but the ump forgot to blow his whistle was just superb, and even though the ball spilt to the Hawks and they goaled I was so so proud of the lads.
I think the real turning point for the RFC will be when we are in a position to maybe pinch a game against better opposition that we make sure we win the 50/50 possessions. We had an opportunity after taking the lead in the third quarter to keep up the momentum by winning the centre bounce. We then proceeded to give Hawthorn easy possessions when the better teams in the competition would have stepped up and ensured they followed up with a another goal to gain the ascendancy. After we hit the front it didn't seem like we knew what to do from that point on, i suppose that comes from being a perennial loser for so long.

In the last quarter whilst we didn't receive one of fifty free kicks that could have been paid during the half forward line scramble it was Hawthorn that managed to win the clearance, we just have to find a way to win those sort of game breaking contested passages. Maybe a fit Cogs would have been the ideal person to get the clearing handball out of the pack that might have resulted in a goal, thats where we are still missing a really strong in and under player like him. Overall strength in this sort of situation is still a big weakness, we get thrown aside during attempted tackles too easily but when we do tackle a player i believe our tackling technique is not quite there as we continually fail to pin the handballing arm therefore allowing opposition teams easy clearances when by rights we should have been winning free kicks for holding/dropping the ball.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #27 on: April 28, 2008, 11:07:36 PM »
In the last quarter whilst we didn't receive one of fifty free kicks that could have been paid during the half forward line scramble it was Hawthorn that managed to win the clearance, .....
They replayed that part on "On The Couch" tonight and counted the could've/should've frees.  It ended up 5 to Hawthorn and 2 to us so we benefited by the play-on calls.  Comment was also that this particular piece of play almost decided the game - whoever won it would have gone on to win.  Easy to say now but there is some merit to it.

They also showed some 'down the ground' shots of Hawthorn's zoning setup and when you look at it in pieces its no wonder teams are having a hard time breaking them down.  They force you to kick or run through 3 waves of brown and gold all zoning off and partly explains now why we were forced into the stop, look around, handball back method of days gone by.  Clarkson admitted this in his interview when he said that stopping our run through the middle was their key.  A bit different to the days when teams turned up to play us without a game plan, knowing full well they didn't need one.  Baby steps on the way to reclaiming respect.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #28 on: April 28, 2008, 11:24:10 PM »
hey monk
thusty played on williams
mguane was on roughead who did benefit from bad umpiring

sorry got them mixed up  :-[

shes ok monk. they are all skinny blondes lol

The backline did ok today they need a few more games
But having that idiot McMahon taking the kickouts is the worst decision
A huge kicker is needed to pump it out at least 60 metres cause our decision making is shocking
l blame the coach for that

someone will prob blast me for saying this but we were 5 points in front and had all the momentum and what does mcmahon do kick it straight to a contest we could not win.
result hawks goal.

game over

Can the RFC recruit someone who can effIN kick over 50 metres out of defence?

coast to coast is our biggest concern and we r so poo at it

Hyde out - Cotchin in and we will suddenly look alot better at it.

Patience grasshopper.

Offline jezza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: The aftermath
« Reply #29 on: April 29, 2008, 07:45:04 AM »
People might not like to hear this either, but Bowden in for McGuane would help clear the ball out of defence a lot easier.