Changes vs. Swannies

[tigersalive]

What I think will happen . . .

Out: Jack
In: Polak


I I would like to happen . . .

Out: Hyde (No match up for him)
In: Polak (Stretch their short backline)

[Francois Jackson]

how about schulz out.

going by TW's theory he should get dropped...0 tackles

[tigersalive]

how about schulz out.

going by TW's theory he should get dropped...0 tackles

Thats a lie, you must have just taken the media's word for it.    Or your a anti-Schulz warrior. 

Terry said no defensive pressure = dropped.


So how about no. 

[Francois Jackson]

how about schulz out.

going by TW's theory he should get dropped...0 tackles

Thats a lie, you must have just taken the media's word for it.    Or your a anti-Schulz warrior. 

Terry said no defensive pressure = dropped.


So how about no. 

your right im not a fan but i am open to be proven incorrect...

if u think i just made it up ur an idiot, i got it from the herald sun and the age..have a look for yourself...

schulz= 0 tackles.

out- schulz

in-polak

[tigersalive]

how about schulz out.

going by TW's theory he should get dropped...0 tackles

Thats a lie, you must have just taken the media's word for it.    Or your a anti-Schulz warrior. 

Terry said no defensive pressure = dropped.


So how about no. 

your right im not a fan but i am open to be proven incorrect...

if u think i just made it up ur an idiot, i got it from the herald sun and the age..have a look for yourself...

schulz= 0 tackles.

out- schulz

in-polak

Like I said, you took the medias word for it in the quote they cut out of a 5+ minute conference.

There were more than the 4 that had more than zero tackles that week, but they had crap games as well.  That was PART of the reason they got dropped, not the only reason.

Wallace's press conference however had him talk about defensive pressure as being the key and players that dont show it wont get a game.  I saw defensive pressure from Schulz last night, plenty of chases, quite a few spoils. 



Anyway why arent you calling for Richo to be dropped this week if thats the only reason you have to drop Schulz?     

[Francois Jackson]

how about schulz out.

going by TW's theory he should get dropped...0 tackles

T

in-polak

Like I said, you took the medias word for it in the quote they cut out of a 5+ minute conference.

There were more than the 4 that had more than zero tackles that week, but they had crap games as well.  That was PART of the reason they got dropped, not the only reason.

Wallace's press conference however had him talk about defensive pressure as being the key and players that dont show it wont get a game.  I saw defensive pressure from Schulz last night, plenty of chases, quite a few spoils. 



Anyway why arent you calling for Richo to be dropped this week if thats the only reason you have to drop Schulz?     

because richo bleeds the Richmond Fc and doesn't have to tackle when he runs 15km a game and is seen spewing his gutz out on the boundary line during a game.

Schulz is yet to prove himself, far from it. In saying that i have seen improvements from his previous years. geez a blinder person can see he is a better footballer but i want to see it every week..

[tigersalive]

how about schulz out.

going by TW's theory he should get dropped...0 tackles

T

in-polak

Like I said, you took the medias word for it in the quote they cut out of a 5+ minute conference.

There were more than the 4 that had more than zero tackles that week, but they had crap games as well.  That was PART of the reason they got dropped, not the only reason.

Wallace's press conference however had him talk about defensive pressure as being the key and players that dont show it wont get a game.  I saw defensive pressure from Schulz last night, plenty of chases, quite a few spoils. 



Anyway why arent you calling for Richo to be dropped this week if thats the only reason you have to drop Schulz?     

because richo bleeds the Richmond Fc and doesn't have to tackle when he runs 15km a game and is seen spewing his gutz out on the boundary line during a game.

Schulz is yet to prove himself, far from it. In saying that i have seen improvements from his previous years. geez a blinder person can see he is a better footballer but i want to see it every week..

So different rules apply to different players at the RFC?

I dont like that to be honest.

They're all there to earn a game.

I believe you're trying to find anything to send Schulz back to Coburg.


Schulz and Richo, despite having zero in the tackle column both deserve a game next week given their performances. 

[bluey_21]

Jack won't be coming out. Coming along very nicely in the seniors

[tigersalive]

Jack won't be coming out. Coming along very nicely in the seniors

I agree but I also didn't see Morton being dropped coming. 

I may be wrong and not see Schulz being dropped coming. 

[bluey_21]

2 people closest to being dropped, well at least in my books, are Tuck and Hyde. Both are struggling for form.

[mjs]

Six posters wanted McMahon dropped according to last week's thread - that Jack been getting into your heads?

[Francois Jackson]

yeah and im the first to put my hand up and say i was one of them..big fricken deal!!

he had a fantastic game last night..faultless but read my posts before the game, i knew he would play a blinder given the team we played.

i want to see that performance when it counts, against the swans and adelaide. then we can judge..

it seems he is found wanting against those teams but excels against the weaker opponents.

[tigersalive]

Six posters wanted McMahon dropped according to last week's thread - that Jack been getting into your heads?

Yeah, because he was costing us big time.

Last night he turned it around.

Simple.

[Smokey]

2 people closest to being dropped, well at least in my books, are Tuck and Hyde. Both are struggling for form.

I'm not sure I can agree with that.   Watching the replay I was amazed how much of the bullocking work Tuck does in and around the packs.  He is playing a different role now to that when he was the key mid but his role is no less important.  Him and Kane Johnson are taking all the knocks that are giving the younger mids a better run at the ball.  I don't think he will be dropped anytime soon but hey, I've been wrong before.  And Hyde is another playing a different role now as a tagger.  His games over the last month have been ok to good and until Jackson steps back up I can't see him getting dropped either.

[{X}]

closest person to being dropped is king

he needs a rest and time to re focus

jack is playing chf beautifully, and is developing at a rapid rate with wonderful skills on both feet and a gr8 mark, he is going no where