For those that are ignorant on these matters - ME lol - can you tell me why you'd go for Corcoran over the Pelican?
Do you know enough to tell me the good points about him and Pelican so we can weigh up the options?
My opinion Moi is based on the fact that he held this type of position at both Essendon and Melbourne. From what has been written and what has been said he did well at both Clubs. Another thing that I like is that he went from Essendon who've never been short of $$$$ to Melb who have always struggled for $$$. So he has seen both sides as they say.
Then there is his currently role at Athletics Australia, which is pretty far removed from football but involved dealing with bureaucrats, politicans, sponsors and anyone else who wants to to stick their nose in
. I'm also assuming this means he has had exposure to other countries methods, structures and procedures in running a sporting organisation.
I just think he ticks the right boxes when they talk about needing to be "contemporary" (whatever that is supposed to mean and represent)
