Mark Seaby

[one-eyed]

Looks like any Seaby deal is off. Cameron said we want to keep our first two picks (Eagles want our first pick) and he wouldn't want to embarrass the Eagles offering a 3rd round pick. He expects Seaby to remain an Eagle.

Likewise we won't be giving up pick 8 for McIntosh.

http://sportal.com.au/afl-news-display/tigers-seaby-deal-unlikely-58181

[bojangles17]

Looks like any Seaby deal is off. Cameron said we want to keep our first two picks (Eagles want our first pick) and he wouldn't want to embarrass the Eagles offering a 3rd round pick. He expects Seaby to remain an Eagle.

Likewise we won't be giving up pick 8 for McIntosh.

http://sportal.com.au/afl-news-display/tigers-seaby-deal-unlikely-58181

i think I like this CC guy, has a clear view of where we're heading that wont be compromised..

[peggles]

Looks like any Seaby deal is off. Cameron said we want to keep our first two picks (Eagles want our first pick) and he wouldn't want to embarrass the Eagles offering a 3rd round pick. He expects Seaby to remain an Eagle.

Likewise we won't be giving up pick 8 for McIntosh.

http://sportal.com.au/afl-news-display/tigers-seaby-deal-unlikely-58181

I hope we tell the Eagles to go forth and multiply. Picks are worth far more this year so rightly 8 and 26 at the very least should be off the table.

Disagree about pick 26.

I'd use that for Hamish McIntosh....

26 + a player say Meyer or even Polo (although I am dead against trading Polo if no-one is aware).

Actually for Hamish I'd offer Pick 26, Raines (one I'd look at trading but doesn't appear to be on the table) and Meyer. I'd try and get North's 3rd round pick too

craig cameron wants to keep both picks and unwilling to part with them for seaby, which is good to hear.  I'd like to have seaby but not at the expense of either of those picks. 
mcintosh on the other hand, i will happily part with pick 26 (+ player) for.  Not raines tho, i'd still like to keep him.  polo and meyer on the other hand i can accept, not that i dont' rate them, just that they're more expendable in my opinion

[one-eyed]

Looks like we may trade away someone still.....

Richmond's interest in Seaby has cooled ... Richmond is reluctant to even offer up its second round selection, pick 26, unless it can move a player out and get another pick in exchange.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24462814-2722,00.html

[mightytiges]

Good!

Only Sarge could get us another mid-late 2nd round pick at best and Port who are the only ones interested in him won't cough up pick 22. The Weagles shouldn't have been so greedy demanding a first round pick  as next year Seaby can walk. Cox will still be No.1 ruck in 2009 so Seaby will still be seeking more opportunty elsewhere.

[one-eyed]

From 5AA last night:

Eagles get Farren Ray
Tigers get Seaby
Dogs get one KPP out of Hughes/Patto/Schulz/McGuane

[WilliamPowell]

From 5AA last night:

Eagles get Farren Ray
Tigers get Seaby
Dogs get one KPP out of Hughes/Patto/Schulz/McGuane

Struth...if that happens then I give up

Only winner from that one would be the Dogs

But the source was 5AA

[Francois Jackson]

From 5AA last night:

Eagles get Farren Ray
Tigers get Seaby
Dogs get one KPP out of Hughes/Patto/Schulz/McGuane

Struth...if that happens then I give up

Only winner from that one would be the Dogs

But the source was 5AA

Patto is a dud WP. They can have him for free

[bojangles17]

From 5AA last night:

Eagles get Farren Ray
Tigers get Seaby
Dogs get one KPP out of Hughes/Patto/Schulz/McGuane

Struth...if that happens then I give up

Only winner from that one would be the Dogs

But the source was 5AA

sounds like rubbish to me , WC wouldnt be too interested in ray...and those talls mentioned are all too important to us

[mightytiges]

McGuane wouldn't be considered up for trade and the Weagles don't want Ray. The Dogs couldn't lose given Ray is a dud. Effectively a small-sized dud for a KPP. 5AA probably stole this off BF. The only merit this trade has is we can only afford a player-4-player trade now after trading away our 3rd round pick. If we trade away pick 26 too we might as well close down Punt Rd.

[one-eyed]

from today's Herald-Sun..

West Coast ruckman Mark Seaby could remain an Eagle, with the Tigers reluctant to give away their second selection after swapping a third-round pick for former Port player Adam Thomson.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,24473190-19742,00.html

[one-eyed]

Seaby will still be in Cox's shadow next year. Do you ppls think this time next year we should try to get him to 'walk' to Punt Rd cheaply given he'll be out of contract?

[blaisee]

most people are actually unaware of rhe fact that seaby was very close to walking to the psd and to richmond last year.

Unfortunately he signed

[Smokey]

In 12 months time we will have a much better idea on Graham so can make a better decision on a Seaby-type.  Personally, I don't think he would be worth the trouble but if we need an insurance/hole-plugger then he might have to do, as long as he came cheaply.

[mightytiges]

Although Seaby will be out of contract next year, it will be difficult to pick him up in the PSD for "free" if we do make the finals. We would still need to do a trade.