im saying there are reasons why there are not too many kkp above 200, the main one being that the percentage of the population that height is low, therefore the percentage of afl players will be low.
of the few that are, they are general played in the ruck as their height gives an advantage in getting first use of the ball. this does not nesesarrily mean they cant become kpf, ( in some cases this is true, though) just that team balance is normalled served better by playing the 200+ in the ruck and the 200- as kpp.
if you truly believe that a player cannot play kpf just because he is over 200cm, then not even the village idiot could say anything to make you look good.
now now al no putting words in my mouth and if your prepared to keep it civil i will too, so i will just ignore the childish village idiot comment for now.
ive not said anywhere that 200cm players cant play kpp. in fact ive spoken about keefe at collingwood on this forum, i have said they are very much a rarity and i have repeatedly said nothing is written in stone and there are alwys exceptions to the guide or rule.
the reason i dont list 200 cm plus players as kpfs is because you can count on one hand if you are lucky just how many have become top level kpfs.
when i say the majority of top level kpfs that have been found are MAINLY, (not written in stone as there are some exceptions) thats just for you so theres no confusion , then id say a decent loose guide when chasing kpfs would be to look in the 194cm - 197 height range. you do understand what a loose guide is.
anyway i dont know what all the fuss is here just you lot being anal nd prcious as usual.
as i said to nuffie judge i have a few guides as to where i place players on the list, i thought it was a decent thing to do as others may take something from it. to date all i have copped is jealousy and ridicukle from just a couple.
for me and i cant see why its such a bad thing, i break tall list structure down to three categories, 190 - 193 and loosly describe them as third tall and running talls. in the main id say this description fits so whats the problem.
for me most of the best kpfs have fallen in the 194 -197 height range. it seems to be a good fit with some exceptions of course but i dont claim its written in stone , its a guide.
for me above 197 and in particular 200cm very few have become top level kpfs. its an observation it seems to be pretty accurate but it seems angers people why i have no idea,again there are some exceptions i dont claim there arent but as an average or a guide i see nothing wrong.
anyway the balls in your court now. you can be civil or it can degenerate into just another slanging match as it usually does. actually it wont even do that as i will just go back to ignoring your posts.