You're on, Ben Cousins
Mark Stevens | March 28, 2009
LEADING sports medico Peter Larkins has expressed surprise at Richmond's decision to send Ben Cousins back into battle after three-quarter time on Thursday night.
Larkins was convinced Cousins' first game with the Tigers was over when he consulted medical staff at the final change.
Richmond has defended the decision to put Cousins back on the ground after the break, saying the medicos cleared him after treatment for soreness at the back of his knee.
But Larkins, close to the bench and huddle in his role as boundary rider for Triple M, said Cousins was having work on his hamstrings.
"He indicated to them that he was sore. The doctor spoke to him and then two of the physios who treat him worked on his right and left hamstring. The main one was his left one," Larkins said.
Cousins started the final term on the bench and Larkins said he had a four to five-minute conversation with club medical staff.
"He did a couple of run-throughs, a couple of high kicks extending his legs," Larkins said.
"And I thought they made a call not to put him back on because he was shaking his head and shrugging his shoulders saying it's not bad, but it's not great.
"I would have thought in that situation, with the state of the game, it would have meant the end of it."
Larkins said Cousins headed for the race, keen for a toilet break, only to be told by Tigers conditioning expert John Vickery that he needed AFL approval under new rules.
"While Ben was standing at the top of the race, Shane Tuck was coming off and they yelled out, 'Hey Cuz, you're on'. He turned around and just ran on to the ground," Larkins said.
"He might have said he was fine, but when he went back on we saw the result."
Cousins suffered a grade-one tear in his left hamstring soon after returning to the fray, in a horror night for the Tigers.
The club said yesterday Cousins had pulled up better than expected and would miss three to four weeks.
Tigers assistant coach David King was adamant Cousins was not troubled by a hamstring problem at the final break.
"It wasn't the hamstring that was causing him concern. It was a problem in behind his knee, it's a sore spot there," King said on 3AW last night.
"They can say what they like, the fact is the medical people checked him over and they ticked him off as right to go back on and we backed them in.
"That's the debate, everyone's talking about 'Would you put him back on with a problem with his hamstring?' He didn't have that, so it's over."
Cousins' injury is to the "belly" of the hamstring, midway between the buttock and the knee.
Larkins said it was the fourth time Cousins had injured his left hamstring and tipped he could be out for up to six weeks.
"Admittedly, he didn't have any trouble at all in his Brownlow year of 2005, but he had trouble in 2006 and 2007," Larkins said.
"Anything from four to six weeks is average in a case like this. I think it is a real setback.
"It was the most predictable thing that was going to happen. It was a matter of when and unfortunately it's happened a little more than three-quarters into his first game."
Cousins found sympathy from the enemy camp after the match, with both Carlton coach Brett Ratten and skipper Chris Judd wishing him well.
"I will give him a call in a week or so when things have settled down for him," Judd said. "It's a tough break, isn't it - it's AFL footy - but he'll put in the rehab and he'll work hard on getting it right.
"Hopefully he's back out there sooner rather than later."
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,25253056-19742,00.html