How can you say that WP, so you would be happy to see the kids play and we get smashed, completely crushing the kids spirits (not that you said that but it could happen). I am all for change and I love watching the kids coming through but I believe it has to be introduced gradualy, these changes could have been made over 2 to 3 weeks to encourage kids like Vickery to play more attacking football then defencive football which he may have to do.
WAT - firstly I think we will win. And I reckon that win will come on the back of these kids, their enthusiasim, passion and desrie to succeed. I also think we are going to win a few more games before the season is out. Actually I wouldn't be surprised if we win more than lose on the stretch home.
You say the changes could have been over a 2-3 week period, I actually think some of these changes should have happened over the last 2-3 weeks. Why isn't important
Simmonds - forms been woeful for a month
Pettifer - was found wanting last week with the speed of the game and he was ordinary against Freo
McMahon - why he was there last week beggars belief
Coughlan - I think I've been very very clear on my thoughts there
Bowden J - is perhaps the unlucky one but the call's been made
And finally, the 2nd half last week was the most insipid and disappointing of 2009 by a long long way and let's be honest - 2009 has been a disaster.
But by not making changes means we accept last weeks 2nd half and quite frankly I don't.
The season that promised so much is shot ... I want to salvage something
I have always wanted to see the kids played and if we are going have that opportunity then that's great