91
Richmond Rant / Re: 2025 AFL Draft
« Last post by ajGreen on November 05, 2025, 07:37:50 PM »"For Richmond I think there's some value in him."
- Cal Twomey on Sam Grlj
- Cal Twomey on Sam Grlj
News:
Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum 
Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Recent Posts
92
Richmond Rant / Re: 2025 AFL Draft
« Last post by ajGreen on November 05, 2025, 07:17:24 PM »"I think he's different to Josh Smillie, but complimentary to Sam Lalor."
- Cal Twomey on Sullivan Robey
- Cal Twomey on Sullivan Robey
93
Richmond Rant / Re: Thomson Dow [merged]
« Last post by Hard Roar Tiger on November 05, 2025, 03:45:55 PM »We did. Sonsie a placeholder on the list until this time year unless he distorts the improvement trend significantly
94
Richmond Rant / Re: Richmond AFLW team [merged]
« Last post by taztiger4 on November 05, 2025, 03:38:06 PM »Should just hand back our licence IMO. Give it to a club more invested.
And give it to who exactly?And please don't say Tassie, they are already guaranteed a licence for season 2027
yet to see anything official around her being delisted.
Fact is, she cant be delisted until the listblodgement period which will be after the trade period, so chances are if anyone is interested (I doubt it) we will trade
If you read the article it doesn't say she's been delisted it says she's not going to be offered a new contract
However, any chance the Club had of a trade is now zero because they all know she's not getting a contract. Why trade for anyone when you can get 'em for free
And I think you'll be surprised... a number of clubs are already interested; that's what I'm hearing
I get her disposal is poor at times but that reasoning can be applied to every player on our list. Sometimes it's not just about the onfield ... just sayin
Re your 1st point - I didnt say she was, I quoted a post that did, but regardless not being offered a contract is in fact being delisted but only becomes official @ list lodgement
2nd point - It happens, in fact we just did exactly the same thing with Geelong & Pat Retschko
3rd point - are you saying her off field is good or bad ?
95
Richmond Rant / Re: Richmond AFLW team [merged]
« Last post by WilliamPowell on November 05, 2025, 03:25:55 PM »Should just hand back our licence IMO. Give it to a club more invested.
And give it to who exactly?
And please don't say Tassie, they are already guaranteed a licence for season 2027
yet to see anything official around her being delisted.
Fact is, she cant be delisted until the listblodgement period which will be after the trade period, so chances are if anyone is interested (I doubt it) we will trade
If you read the article it doesn't say she's been delisted it says she's not going to be offered a new contract
However, any chance the Club had of a trade is now zero because they all know she's not getting a contract. Why trade for anyone when you can get 'em for free
And I think you'll be surprised... a number of clubs are already interested; that's what I'm hearing
I get her disposal is poor at times but that reasoning can be applied to every player on our list. Sometimes it's not just about the onfield ... just sayin
96
Richmond Rant / Re: 2025 AFL Draft
« Last post by Simonator on November 05, 2025, 02:44:04 PM »Starting to get to the stage where I think I'd be upset if it's Grlj or even cumming.
Without a Melbourne or essendon trade
Why?
97
Richmond Rant / Re: Richmond AFLW team [merged]
« Last post by taztiger4 on November 05, 2025, 01:44:02 PM »Whilst I am surprised at the decision I think it is the right call for the reasons TazTiger said, her disposal is terrible and she is slow as.
Grieves is a much better version of the same type of player.
Agree Chuck, but as WP said, but I'll go further in saying reckon there is half the side that goes before Grace. Grace isn't playing for North Melbourne but shes good enough to get the footy and where our list is at, simply being miles off it seems a ridiculous decision to cut Grace before 10 others. If there is a heap of other moving ons then fair enough.
Would love to get clarity as to why we aren't facilitating a trade to get some draft currency.
I think that's the main thing that's frustrating me as well, why couldn't she be traded?
yet to see anything official around her being delisted.
Fact is, she cant be delisted until the listblodgement period which will be after the trade period, so chances are if anyone is interested (I doubt it) we will trade
98
Richmond Rant / Re: Richmond AFLW team [merged]
« Last post by Andyy on November 05, 2025, 01:42:46 PM »Should just hand back our licence IMO. Give it to a club more invested.
99
Richmond Rant / Re: Richmond AFLW team [merged]
« Last post by Thrasher97 on November 05, 2025, 01:23:40 PM »Whilst I am surprised at the decision I think it is the right call for the reasons TazTiger said, her disposal is terrible and she is slow as.
Grieves is a much better version of the same type of player.
Agree Chuck, but as WP said, but I'll go further in saying reckon there is half the side that goes before Grace. Grace isn't playing for North Melbourne but shes good enough to get the footy and where our list is at, simply being miles off it seems a ridiculous decision to cut Grace before 10 others. If there is a heap of other moving ons then fair enough.
Would love to get clarity as to why we aren't facilitating a trade to get some draft currency.
I think that's the main thing that's frustrating me as well, why couldn't she be traded?
100
Richmond Rant / Re: Richmond's greatest comeback wins (afl site)
« Last post by Hard Roar Tiger on November 05, 2025, 01:04:42 PM »That Hawks game was a ripper. I was best man at a mates wedding. Got out of the car and we were 50 down.
By the time the ceremony was done, we were walking down the aisle out of the church and my mate says “We’re up!” as I walked past him
By the time the ceremony was done, we were walking down the aisle out of the church and my mate says “We’re up!” as I walked past him
