Author Topic: paul roos / micharl malthouse  (Read 3184 times)

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
paul roos / micharl malthouse
« on: July 01, 2012, 02:27:22 AM »
Im jack off harwicks thought pattern.

You cannot blame the players 100%. One must question the team selection.

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: paul roos / micharl malthouse
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2012, 07:54:42 AM »
AND TACTICS

 hardwick was well and truly outcoached yesterday

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13709
Re: paul roos / micharl malthouse
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2012, 08:23:13 AM »
I don't think he is anywhere close enough to be sacked in any way shape of form

However he needs to find a Plan B in the forward half as something is going seriously wrong down there

Griffiths in the last should've been moved there. Absolutely he should've his a forward FFS

It seemed he was motionless in the last just let it all happen

Miller and Jackson selections defy logic

IMO he has had a poor month

Writing on the wall will be next year. I've conceded we won't make finals this year but next year if we cop and injury or 2 then he can join the scrap heap

We have had very few injuries yet still come up short. What's our excuse? Not ready, too young. Rubbish!!

FFS even Bombers under Knighter made finals.

Stkilda and Freo will make the 8 and we can beat them both on any day any year so that to me says we have failed this year if we don't get that spot







Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: paul roos / micharl malthouse
« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2012, 09:08:54 AM »
Jeebus, Roosey would be good.

Offline RollsRoyce

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: paul roos / micharl malthouse
« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2012, 09:32:35 AM »
Jeebus, Roosey would be good.

No he wouldn't. If we had him, we'd be playing that unwatchable stacks on the mill rubbish that he perfected at Sydney.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: paul roos / micharl malthouse
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2012, 09:47:19 AM »
spot on rolls.

we dont need roosy or malthouse, all we need to do is borrow their magic wand, wave it around and chant a few incarnations, instantly we will have the unbeatable premiership side that is highly craved
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: paul roos / micharl malthouse
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2012, 10:47:39 AM »
Common guys, we don't need these types of threads

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: paul roos / micharl malthouse
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2012, 11:07:27 AM »
im not saying sack hardwick but he and his coaching has cost us important games thus yr
he needs to wake up, stop being big brother to the boys and start bloody being a coach

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: paul roos / micharl malthouse
« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2012, 11:12:58 AM »
Jeebus, Roosey would be good.

No he wouldn't. If we had him, we'd be playing that unwatchable stacks on the mill rubbish that he perfected at Sydney.
You dont like Premierships :huh

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13709
Re: paul roos / micharl malthouse
« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2012, 12:39:21 PM »
im not saying sack hardwick but he and his coaching has cost us important games thus yr
he needs to wake up, stop being big brother to the boys and start bloody being a coach

agree with this

Its a happy family down there.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Online Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5047
  • All up inside ya.
Re: paul roos / micharl malthouse
« Reply #10 on: July 01, 2012, 12:47:45 PM »
Below standard performances from Rance, Morris, Miller etc. lost us this game, not Hardwick.

And while disappointing,  losing to Adelaide narrowly on their home turf is not the end of the world. Some of the poo-slinging monkeys on here need to get back in their cage.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: paul roos / micharl malthouse
« Reply #11 on: July 01, 2012, 01:03:56 PM »
Some of the poo-slinging monkeys on here need to get back in their cage.

:lol Vintage Slick Cock. :thumbsup

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: paul roos / micharl malthouse
« Reply #12 on: July 01, 2012, 01:46:06 PM »
Garbage thread.

Where were you all 5 weeks ago when we beat Hawthorn.

Yeah sack a coach with two years to run on his contract and then bring in a mercenary  for big $$$$$.

He had a bad day not happy what he said in the post match presser. Move on.

If anyone thinks we are worse off now than what we were at the equivalent stage under Wallet then you're stuffed. In Wallets third year after round thirteen we were 1-1-13.

Now knowing that we still have a fair way to go in our rebuild don't we but we are better off than we were in 2007. Have a bex and relax.

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4736
Re: paul roos / micharl malthouse
« Reply #13 on: July 01, 2012, 01:55:42 PM »
Adelaide have only lost once at home all year ( to Collingwood ).

We were in front at 3/4 time.

Im sold ...time to replace the coach. ::)
Unleash the tornado

Offline RollsRoyce

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: paul roos / micharl malthouse
« Reply #14 on: July 01, 2012, 01:57:29 PM »
Jeebus, Roosey would be good.

No he wouldn't. If we had him, we'd be playing that unwatchable stacks on the mill rubbish that he perfected at Sydney.
You dont like Premierships :huh

What won Premierships in 2005 or 06 or whenever it was wouldn't necessarily work now. That poo was fashionable then, and accordingly Sydney and the WCE served up THE most BORING Grand Final I can remember. Hopefully the game has evolved beyond that now,(even though scumbags like Ross Lyon keep trying to drag us back to the dark ages again) and we can be treated to footy again and not rugby. When Richmond gets it right, they play the most attractive and exciting brand of footy you could ever wish to see. But even working  in the media where he belongs, Roos can't help himself, sniffily describing our great win against St. Kilda, an advertisment for the way the game should be played, as "not ideal".