Author Topic: Non-Richmond Games 2014  (Read 48281 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98042
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #315 on: May 24, 2014, 07:11:53 PM »
Some friendly umpiring gets the Pies over the line  ::).

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98042
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #316 on: May 24, 2014, 10:24:42 PM »
Port beat Hawthorn 100-86 to go top. Two years ago they needed tarpaulins to try and hide all the empty seats but now they're getting 52k full houses.


Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #317 on: May 25, 2014, 06:32:44 PM »
Gold Coast one game clear of Hawthorn atm.

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #318 on: May 25, 2014, 07:30:06 PM »
Carlscum win another close one to notch up win number 4. :banghead

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #319 on: May 26, 2014, 01:38:06 AM »
Gold Coast one game clear of Hawthorn atm.
In hindsight our loss to GC wasn't that bad. If only we didn't poo the bed because of it.  :banghead

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #320 on: May 26, 2014, 01:39:07 AM »
Carlscum win another close one to notch up win number 4. :banghead
Couldn't breathe I was so nervous hoping Adelaide would win. And just to make it really feel like barracking for Richmond they didn't fail to let me down.  :lol :lol

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #321 on: May 26, 2014, 01:30:52 PM »
Gold Coast one game clear of Hawthorn atm.
In hindsight our loss to GC wasn't that bad. If only we didn't poo the bed because of it.  :banghead

We were lucky that gun kid got hurt I reckon

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #322 on: May 26, 2014, 03:28:39 PM »
surely Ablett won't go over that elbow flick.

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #323 on: May 26, 2014, 10:52:18 PM »
Gold Coast one game clear of Hawthorn atm.
In hindsight our loss to GC wasn't that bad. If only we didn't poo the bed because of it.  :banghead

We were lucky that gun kid got hurt I reckon
Yeh his 10 touches would have slaughtered us.  :lol

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #324 on: May 29, 2014, 08:42:31 PM »
Go cats  :lol
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98042
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #325 on: May 29, 2014, 09:06:46 PM »
95 - 16 at 3/4 time  :o.

When was the last time the Cats lost by 100?

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19395
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #326 on: May 29, 2014, 09:49:36 PM »
Geelong deserved that for wearing that jumper.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #327 on: May 29, 2014, 09:53:47 PM »
95 - 16 at 3/4 time  :o.

When was the last time the Cats lost by 100?

2006

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #328 on: May 29, 2014, 10:42:54 PM »
spanked
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Non-Richmond Games 2014
« Reply #329 on: May 29, 2014, 11:31:46 PM »
Geelong deserved that for wearing that jumper.
Sydney's was just as bad. Only reason it was OK'd was it was designed by the mum of an Australian of the Year.