Author Topic: Richmond vs North Melbourne @ Bellerive Oval --- Round 23, 2025  (Read 2098 times)

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10958
Re: Richmond vs North Melbourne @ Bellerive Oval --- Round 23, 2025
« Reply #135 on: August 18, 2025, 02:33:22 PM »
@tommorris32

"The playing group just erupted at Moorabbin having been told Nas is staying. It’s $2 million x 2 guaranteed money.

Adelaide’s offer was $1.5-1.7 x 4 (they were prepared to offer longer if needed). Port’s was 12 years at up to $2.5 million per season… As much as $30 million in total"

 :o

30m

Utter nonsense surely

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5051
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond vs North Melbourne @ Bellerive Oval --- Round 23, 2025
« Reply #136 on: August 18, 2025, 03:21:07 PM »
It's time to start adding a free agent or 2 this year.

We started with bachar and it's time now to start. A midfielder would be nice who isn't getting game time.

Imagine if we lost hopper and tt this year? Serpel and Yze would be dead men walking.

Need to get improving.

While understand your point Frankie. Personally I wouldn't be going after free agents this year

And TBBH  I doubt we'd attract any anyway

My view is...

We go to the draft and being in more young talent to compliment what we've got. 2027 onwards we go after free agents.


Sh

The club should always be looking at FA as it doesn’t cost us any draft capital. Whether players actually want to come here in our current state is a seperate matter but it shouldn’t stop the club from making pitches.

I would steer clear of making any big trade plays for a couple years which cost us top end draft picks.

Offline sabartooth

  • Big Gibbo's Official Mentor !
  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 216
Re: Richmond vs North Melbourne @ Bellerive Oval --- Round 23, 2025
« Reply #137 on: August 18, 2025, 05:40:20 PM »
How much for SONSIE  ::)
Make Australia Great Again

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14320
Re: Richmond vs North Melbourne @ Bellerive Oval --- Round 23, 2025
« Reply #138 on: August 18, 2025, 06:05:52 PM »
It's time to start adding a free agent or 2 this year.

We started with bachar and it's time now to start. A midfielder would be nice who isn't getting game time.

Imagine if we lost hopper and tt this year? Serpel and Yze would be dead men walking.

Need to get improving.

While understand your point Frankie. Personally I wouldn't be going after free agents this year

And TBBH  I doubt we'd attract any anyway

My view is...

We go to the draft and being in more young talent to compliment what we've got. 2027 onwards we go after free agents.


Sh

The club should always be looking at FA as it doesn’t cost us any draft capital. Whether players actually want to come here in our current state is a seperate matter but it shouldn’t stop the club from making pitches.

I would steer clear of making any big trade plays for a couple years which cost us top end draft picks.

spot on. I would start now, though they have to still fill a need and i think surely there is a mid or ruck worth looking at?

we wouldn't want to lose Nank.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Online eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3926
Re: Richmond vs North Melbourne @ Bellerive Oval --- Round 23, 2025
« Reply #139 on: August 18, 2025, 06:53:01 PM »
It is going to take awhile to build up midfield depth. We lost alot of depth last year. I am hoping Lalor and Josh can have a good run at it next year but unless we recruit a ready made midfielder in this draft I don't see things drastically changing.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 101073
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs North Melbourne @ Bellerive Oval --- Round 23, 2025
« Reply #140 on: August 18, 2025, 07:59:29 PM »
AFL Report Card: Round 23

Jack Jovanovski, Ben Waterworth, Catherine Healey and Ben Cotton
Foxsports
18 Aug 2025


RICHMOND

An extremely disappointing afternoon for the Richmond faithful, particularly after what was a promising start to the game. The Tigers were thoroughly outplayed after quarter-time in a fixture they would’ve gone in thinking they were a real chance to come away with the four points. And to add injury to insult, star interceptor Nick Vlastuin’s year is done with a broken leg.

In the votes

Skipper Toby Nankervis battled all afternoon against one of the AFL’s top ruckmen in Tristan Xerri, finishing as Richmond’s highest-rated player with 21 disposals, five score involvements and five intercepts. Spearhead Tom Lynch looked sure to be the gamebreaker but was well-held from quarter-time onwards. He still finished with three goals and a team-high seven score involvements.

Room for improvement

The Tigers registered 20 fewer entries than the Kangaroos, telling the story of the dominance the hosts were able to impose after the visitors jumped out to an early lead. Staggeringly, Richmond allowed North Melbourne 431 disposals to its 297. For context, the Roos have averaged 357 disposals per game for the year. Adem Yze’s side did next to nothing to stop the Roos’ uncontested game, with the Kangas recording 113 (!) more uncontested possessions for the match. And perhaps worst of all, Yze’s coaching staff elected not to put a hard tag on Harry Sheezel, who virtually did as he pleased en route to an equal-best all-time 54 disposals. The Tigers allowed the Roos to post their best score (20.15) in six years.

Grade

F

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-2025-round-23-report-card-highlights-every-club-reviewed-and-graded-best-and-worst-players-stats-latest-news/news-story/e5be19b9382685a191e041506d3cfe7b

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 101073
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs North Melbourne @ Bellerive Oval --- Round 23, 2025
« Reply #141 on: August 18, 2025, 08:10:43 PM »
"For me, that just becomes a bit embarrassing for the Richmond football club."

Hirdy & the panel were full of praise for Harry Sheezel – but perplexed at the Tigers' decision to not tag the young gun.

#9FootyFurnace | Watch on Nine & 9Now

VIDEO: https://x.com/FootyonNine/status/1957065856812204278

------------------------------------------------------

Richmond's decision not to tag Harry Sheezel in record-equalling performance labelled 'embarrassing'

Emily Patterson
Nine
August 18, 2025


There has been plenty of praise for Harry Sheezel after he equalled the AFL/ VFL record for the most disposals in a game, but some pundits have questioned the Tigers' "embarrassing" decision not to tag the young gun.

Sheezel led the Kangaroos to a 48-point win over the Tigers at Bellerive Oval on Sunday, equalling the all-time disposals record of 54. The record was first set by Tom Mitchell in 2018 while playing for the Hawks.

The mark also broke North Melbourne's previous possession record of 44.

With Richmond allowing Sheezel to run free, Essendon great James Hird criticised the team for not applying a tagger or run-with player.

"After he had 28 [disposals] in the first half and 26 in the second half for a total of 54, I think someone needs to go near him, or even just a tag at stoppages," he told Nine's Footy Furnace.

"Start on him around stoppages and around the ball, because for me, I think that becomes a bit embarrassing for the Richmond football club that someone is able to get that many possessions.

"Fifty-four shows that Richmond was going one way and North Melbourne was going the other way, and they were definitely not coming together."

Speaking post-match, Richmond coach Adam Yze defended the team's decision not to tag Sheezel.

"At half time I think [Sheezel] had 20-odd [disposals] and the game was in the balance," he told media.

"The third quarter, I didn't see that as being a big issue, especially early.

"He did go forward and kick a couple of goals, so Jack Ross went to him for a little bit.

"Obviously, he's good enough to just go and change positions...

"I think he ended up with 12 or 13 in the last quarter; we kicked six goals. So, you're always looking at those numbers, but he obviously had a great game, and he's a terrific kid."

Also finishing the match with two goals, Sheezel's performance highlighted his dual threat as both a high-possession player and a goal scorer when moved forward.

Geelong legend Jimmy Bartel argued that Richmond needed to send someone to Sheezel as a "teaching moment" despite the game being a dead rubber.

"I know he's going to be too good, and I think that's the point Yze was making, like we're just playing footy out there," he said.

"But it didn't really matter in the end if Richmond won or lost this game, because they own North Melbourne's pick."

With a pre-existing pick swap agreement in place between the two clubs, even if they were to swap positions on the ladder, Richmond would still get the pick that is higher in the draft order.

The Tigers also chose not to tag Nasiah Wanganeen-Milera in their game against St Kilda the week before, allowing the defender to tally 33 disposals.

https://www.nine.com.au/sport/afl/news-2025-harry-sheezel-north-melbourne-kangaroos-equals-disposals-record-reaction-richmond-tigers-criticism-20250818-p5mnr6.html

Online Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5270
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Richmond vs North Melbourne @ Bellerive Oval --- Round 23, 2025
« Reply #142 on: August 18, 2025, 08:57:22 PM »
He’s right. It is bloody embarrassing. Thanks Adem.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4354
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond vs North Melbourne @ Bellerive Oval --- Round 23, 2025
« Reply #143 on: August 18, 2025, 10:32:29 PM »
It's time to start adding a free agent or 2 this year.

We started with bachar and it's time now to start. A midfielder would be nice who isn't getting game time.

Imagine if we lost hopper and tt this year? Serpel and Yze would be dead men walking.

Need to get improving.

While understand your point Frankie. Personally I wouldn't be going after free agents this year

And TBBH  I doubt we'd attract any anyway

My view is...

We go to the draft and being in more young talent to compliment what we've got. 2027 onwards we go after free agents.


Sh

Bachar Houli Grigger 2011 versions didn't think the same.

Wouldn't hurt to wait a year, but I definitely want to see something coming through in that mid 20's range very soon.

Frankie reckon at least two F/A, four nd picks and a spot for Campbell to the main list and and then look at Msd psd and psss drafts.
How hard would it be to take a state league player with more attributes for the top level than say Sonsie or Dow. Cut and cut hard giving ourselves the best chance to find one or two good upgrades on blokes who clearly are not going to take us anywhere.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 41417
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs North Melbourne @ Bellerive Oval --- Round 23, 2025
« Reply #144 on: August 18, 2025, 10:48:59 PM »

Frankie reckon at least two F/A, four nd picks and a spot for Campbell to the main list and and then look at Msd psd and psss drafts.
How hard would it be to take a state league player with more attributes for the top level than say Sonsie or Dow. Cut and cut hard giving ourselves the best chance to find one or two good upgrades on blokes who clearly are not going to take us anywhere.

It is easy to say cut and cut hard. Even easier to say let's got for 2 free agents, 4 draft picks, Campbell to the main list. Then you want to make sure there's spots for the pre-season draft, mid season draft and pre-season supplementary selection period

Buy how do you do it?

With your grand plan you are suggesting we delist contracted players, which comes at a cost to your salary cap.

And please don't suggest trading blokes out because I've no doubt the ones you suggest to get rid of are on your dud list. So who's going to trade for them?
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)