Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Quote from: gerks on December 31, 2013, 12:37:12 PMhas this dud been delisted yet?if not why not?He is on his last chance.....
has this dud been delisted yet?if not why not?
Quote from: the claw on December 20, 2013, 09:19:40 PMso wp how does banfield rate over the journey. poorly is the fact. i would not have thought it was debateable. its right there for all to see.I wasn't talking about Banfield. Never mentioned him. You don't agree worth his selection and I have no problem with thatBut....l You made a sweeping statement saying the club "continues to take players on hope rather than properly assessing them" I was simply replying to that saying that you were stating it as some sort of fact when it was only your opinion based more so on them not selecting players you approved of. It's your opinion and as I said you are entitled toI have no problem with you or anyone questioning them but to suggest that don't have a criteria when they select players is I will repeat ridiculous. They have clearly, the fact you don't agree with it doesn't mean one doesn't exist.That was the point of my post, nothing more; nothing less
so wp how does banfield rate over the journey. poorly is the fact. i would not have thought it was debateable. its right there for all to see.
Quote from: WilliamPowell on December 20, 2013, 10:52:01 PMQuote from: the claw on December 20, 2013, 09:19:40 PMso wp how does banfield rate over the journey. poorly is the fact. i would not have thought it was debateable. its right there for all to see.I wasn't talking about Banfield. Never mentioned him. You don't agree worth his selection and I have no problem with thatBut....l You made a sweeping statement saying the club "continues to take players on hope rather than properly assessing them" I was simply replying to that saying that you were stating it as some sort of fact when it was only your opinion based more so on them not selecting players you approved of. It's your opinion and as I said you are entitled toI have no problem with you or anyone questioning them but to suggest that don't have a criteria when they select players is I will repeat ridiculous. They have clearly, the fact you don't agree with it doesn't mean one doesn't exist.That was the point of my post, nothing more; nothing lessthis thread is about banfield of course i was talking about banfield and his weaknesses which we have ignored. cant kick cant find the ball and his performances over 6 yrs have in the main been poor. can they give us one real good redeeming attribute as to why they ignored these things or isit they didnt even look at em. its not just banfield they have done this with either.in this case it really does SEEM they the club have no criteria and they took him on hope rather than properly assesing hima fair few of my mates think he can play thats potential i suppose. but based on some pretty simple criteria which we obviously have ignored i dont think he should have been taken.
Quote from: the claw on January 02, 2014, 12:20:08 AMQuote from: WilliamPowell on December 20, 2013, 10:52:01 PMQuote from: the claw on December 20, 2013, 09:19:40 PMso wp how does banfield rate over the journey. poorly is the fact. i would not have thought it was debateable. its right there for all to see.I wasn't talking about Banfield. Never mentioned him. You don't agree worth his selection and I have no problem with thatBut....l You made a sweeping statement saying the club "continues to take players on hope rather than properly assessing them" I was simply replying to that saying that you were stating it as some sort of fact when it was only your opinion based more so on them not selecting players you approved of. It's your opinion and as I said you are entitled toI have no problem with you or anyone questioning them but to suggest that don't have a criteria when they select players is I will repeat ridiculous. They have clearly, the fact you don't agree with it doesn't mean one doesn't exist.That was the point of my post, nothing more; nothing lessthis thread is about banfield of course i was talking about banfield and his weaknesses which we have ignored. cant kick cant find the ball and his performances over 6 yrs have in the main been poor. can they give us one real good redeeming attribute as to why they ignored these things or isit they didnt even look at em. its not just banfield they have done this with either.in this case it really does SEEM they the club have no criteria and they took him on hope rather than properly assesing hima fair few of my mates think he can play thats potential i suppose. but based on some pretty simple criteria which we obviously have ignored i dont think he should have been taken.FFS, as has been said, he is only a rookie!!!!!!!Very little given away and he has a bit of X-factor about him with his speed. Just give the club a break and hold off your criticisms until AFTER he has failed at least.
Quote from: YellowandBlackBlood on January 02, 2014, 11:47:29 AMQuote from: the claw on January 02, 2014, 12:20:08 AMQuote from: WilliamPowell on December 20, 2013, 10:52:01 PMQuote from: the claw on December 20, 2013, 09:19:40 PMso wp how does banfield rate over the journey. poorly is the fact. i would not have thought it was debateable. its right there for all to see.I wasn't talking about Banfield. Never mentioned him. You don't agree worth his selection and I have no problem with thatBut....l You made a sweeping statement saying the club "continues to take players on hope rather than properly assessing them" I was simply replying to that saying that you were stating it as some sort of fact when it was only your opinion based more so on them not selecting players you approved of. It's your opinion and as I said you are entitled toI have no problem with you or anyone questioning them but to suggest that don't have a criteria when they select players is I will repeat ridiculous. They have clearly, the fact you don't agree with it doesn't mean one doesn't exist.That was the point of my post, nothing more; nothing lessthis thread is about banfield of course i was talking about banfield and his weaknesses which we have ignored. cant kick cant find the ball and his performances over 6 yrs have in the main been poor. can they give us one real good redeeming attribute as to why they ignored these things or isit they didnt even look at em. its not just banfield they have done this with either.in this case it really does SEEM they the club have no criteria and they took him on hope rather than properly assesing hima fair few of my mates think he can play thats potential i suppose. but based on some pretty simple criteria which we obviously have ignored i dont think he should have been taken.FFS, as has been said, he is only a rookie!!!!!!!Very little given away and he has a bit of X-factor about him with his speed. Just give the club a break and hold off your criticisms until AFTER he has failed at least.weather its a rookie pick a mid range nd pick, a first rnd pick or a mature recruit. the question should be asked. why are we continuing to take players with such obvious weakneses and poor performance records.
weather its a rookie pick a mid range nd pick, a first rnd pick or a mature recruit. the question should be asked. why are we continuing to take players with such obvious weakneses and poor performance records.