Author Topic: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread  (Read 10346 times)

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #90 on: April 10, 2011, 09:38:44 AM »
Agree Daniel.
I have some real concerns on Conca.
Repeatedly stands on "'wrong side "" at stoppages.
Something you learn in under 16,s :banghead

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #91 on: April 10, 2011, 09:44:18 AM »
interesting reading a report on Conca, quote, will be a "'high end "' B Grade player. mmmmmmmmmm
And we pick him up first round , pick 6. BIG RISK

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #92 on: April 10, 2011, 09:50:23 AM »
i think it was on another forum someone posted about a comment from someone in recruiting. They said that how the very good juniors often don't develop strong defensife skills because they are the ones dominating and it needs to be installed in them when they get to AFL level

Conca is obviously being played in defence to learn these skills.

He show enough when he gets the ball to suggest he will be a good player if he makes the grade, but right now he is on a very steep learning curve indeed. Yeah, he does get caught out of position a bit, but he has a few more experienced mates.

Hopefully what we are seeing is some short term pain for some long term gain.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #93 on: April 10, 2011, 09:58:26 AM »
yep, 1st Round draft picks who have problems :banghead
why pick them first round ?
Seen other 1st rounders over the years smash them, not us

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #94 on: April 10, 2011, 10:21:33 AM »
I apologise. I left out Jackson in the good players for the side. Jackson tried hard. Helbig has a good attitude. Graham's attitude was poor last night

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #95 on: April 10, 2011, 10:32:13 AM »
Hellbig goes okay. :thumbsup

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #96 on: April 10, 2011, 10:33:49 AM »
some of these kids need a spell, conca, helbig, astbury, take your pick, give tuck, webbers and Miller a go. we need to get the mix right with experience and youth, playing hawthorn and collingwood aint the time to feature 4 or 5 kids in the team that have played less than half dozen games, but hey i might just be a little crazy ::)
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Online julzqld

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3880
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #97 on: April 10, 2011, 10:47:21 AM »
Where's Nason?

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #98 on: April 10, 2011, 10:50:45 AM »
Where's Nason?

Who knows.
probably not in our best 22

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13612
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #99 on: April 10, 2011, 10:54:29 AM »
i think it was on another forum someone posted about a comment from someone in recruiting. They said that how the very good juniors often don't develop strong defensife skills because they are the ones dominating and it needs to be installed in them when they get to AFL level

Conca is obviously being played in defence to learn these skills.

He show enough when he gets the ball to suggest he will be a good player if he makes the grade, but right now he is on a very steep learning curve indeed. Yeah, he does get caught out of position a bit, but he has a few more experienced mates.

Hopefully what we are seeing is some short term pain for some long term gain.

Agree Al but my opinion is of Conca not the more experienced guys who let us down big time.

I listened and read over the last 3 weeks re: Conca, in that he is a jet this that. Well IMO i dont see anything that he was a good recruit at this stage.

Now the year is only 3 weeks so thats all i can judge him on. He seems slow, short for a descent midfielder these days, and lacks penetration in his kick. He doesnt seem to have the smarts either.

Right now i would say Helbig seems a far better recruit than Conca.



Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #100 on: April 10, 2011, 10:57:21 AM »
when you play in defensive 50, you stand between your player and the goal,otherwords you stand goal side.. Conca no idea

Online julzqld

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3880
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #101 on: April 10, 2011, 10:59:46 AM »
Where's Nason?

Who knows.
probably not in our best 22
And those who played last night were?

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #102 on: April 10, 2011, 11:11:12 AM »
Hellbig goes okay. :thumbsup

Agree. Can become a real decent player Helbig IMHO.

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #103 on: April 10, 2011, 11:13:04 AM »
Where's Nason?

Who knows.
probably not in our best 22
And those who played last night were?

Nason wouldnt get a game in a top 8 team, not up to it

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4842
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Tigers versus Hawks- match thread
« Reply #104 on: April 10, 2011, 11:28:10 AM »
Where's Nason?

Who knows.
probably not in our best 22
And those who played last night were?

Nason wouldnt get a game in a top 8 team, not up to it

we are not a top 8 team yet are we?? Play those who deserve again drop those who don't......it's pretty simple.