21
Richmond Rant / Re: 2025 AFL Draft
« Last post by MintOnLamb on Yesterday at 07:17:55 PM »Apart from his name, is he good? Remember Chris Naishes boys were a bust
Plus don’t talk about Disco Bourke
Plus don’t talk about Disco Bourke
News:
Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum 
Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Recent Posts
22
Richmond Rant / Re: 2025 AFL Draft
« Last post by ajGreen on Yesterday at 04:45:31 PM »@ElliotSinJin
It seems pretty unlikely that Kellaway will be bid on prior to pick 38. I have not seen him in any media top 40 rankings. If a big is made after pick 37 Richmond could literally use pick 99 to match if they chose to.
@ElliotSinJin
I think he definitely gets to us. In a recent interview he said only two clubs had interviewed him outside of richmond
** Accompanying image details updated AFL bid-matching rules, including 10-90% discounts on father-son bids from picks 1-36 and equivalent point matching up to selection 36, enabling low-cost responses like using pick 99 post-pick 37. **
It seems pretty unlikely that Kellaway will be bid on prior to pick 38. I have not seen him in any media top 40 rankings. If a big is made after pick 37 Richmond could literally use pick 99 to match if they chose to.
@ElliotSinJin
I think he definitely gets to us. In a recent interview he said only two clubs had interviewed him outside of richmond
** Accompanying image details updated AFL bid-matching rules, including 10-90% discounts on father-son bids from picks 1-36 and equivalent point matching up to selection 36, enabling low-cost responses like using pick 99 post-pick 37. **
23
Richmond Rant / Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2025
« Last post by Hard Roar Tiger on Yesterday at 03:49:14 PM »Spot on.
24
Richmond Rant / Re: Clubs ranked on how much they have benefited from father-son & Academy picks (HSun)
« Last post by Andyy on Yesterday at 03:16:36 PM »1988 Sean Bowden Richmond Michael Bowden N/A 6 59
1992 Matthew Richardson Richmond Alan Richardson N/A 282 103
1994 David Bourke Richmond Francis Bourke N/A 85 300
1995 Joel Bowden Richmond Michael Bowden N/A 265 57
1995 Nick Jewell Richmond Tony Jewell N/A 1 80
2003 Tom Roach Richmond Michael Roach 37 11 200
2017 Patrick Naish Richmond Chris Naish 34 9 143
1992 Matthew Richardson Richmond Alan Richardson N/A 282 103
1994 David Bourke Richmond Francis Bourke N/A 85 300
1995 Joel Bowden Richmond Michael Bowden N/A 265 57
1995 Nick Jewell Richmond Tony Jewell N/A 1 80
2003 Tom Roach Richmond Michael Roach 37 11 200
2017 Patrick Naish Richmond Chris Naish 34 9 143
25
Richmond Rant / Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2025
« Last post by Andyy on Yesterday at 03:04:55 PM »^ hence I say 'does a daniher'
Goes to the club he likes, is suddenly happy, them boom healthy and productive
Goes to the club he likes, is suddenly happy, them boom healthy and productive
26
Richmond Rant / Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2025
« Last post by Hard Roar Tiger on Yesterday at 03:00:28 PM »I am a huge wrap for Charlie. At his best, he’s got all the attributes to be a top shelfer as a key forward.
Sydney is the perfect fit as it has been so many times before when a key forward wants out of Melbourne.
It’s the perfect match and I think putting knee to one side (Crazy Joe Daniher had a very similar knock on him) he will kill it at Sydney
Sydney is the perfect fit as it has been so many times before when a key forward wants out of Melbourne.
It’s the perfect match and I think putting knee to one side (Crazy Joe Daniher had a very similar knock on him) he will kill it at Sydney
27
Richmond Rant / Re: Ivan Soldo traded to Port [merged]
« Last post by Hard Roar Tiger on Yesterday at 02:55:44 PM »Well, if we’ve got a thirst for it, we should really crack a soldo!
In all seriousness, that dog hawkins ruined his career when he shoved him in a pack and he did his knee. A slowish big man became almost immobile when he came back.
In all seriousness, that dog hawkins ruined his career when he shoved him in a pack and he did his knee. A slowish big man became almost immobile when he came back.
28
Richmond Rant / Re: Ivan Soldo traded to Port [merged]
« Last post by Andyy on Yesterday at 02:41:52 PM »I don't get the whippings. He was a limited but serviceable player. We've had worse.
Gave Nank a chop out and could be quite reliable in front of goal if only 30m out or so. The combination worked well in 2019-20 and if it wasn't for fat-arse Porkins he would be a dual premiership player.
Knee injury really set him back IMO.
It’s pretty simple
I’d prefer to get games into kids than an older Soldo
I see it as a wasted list spot
I agree
Just don't agree he's one of our worst ever players.
We've had blokes that wouldn't get a game on merit. Soldo got 50+ and a flag.
29
Richmond Rant / Re: Ivan Soldo traded to Port [merged]
« Last post by Damo on Yesterday at 02:11:50 PM »I don't get the whippings. He was a limited but serviceable player. We've had worse.
Gave Nank a chop out and could be quite reliable in front of goal if only 30m out or so. The combination worked well in 2019-20 and if it wasn't for fat-arse Porkins he would be a dual premiership player.
Knee injury really set him back IMO.
It’s pretty simple
I’d prefer to get games into kids than an older Soldo
I see it as a wasted list spot
30
Richmond Rant / Re: Ivan Soldo traded to Port [merged]
« Last post by Andyy on Yesterday at 01:48:26 PM »I don't get the whippings. He was a limited but serviceable player. We've had worse.
Gave Nank a chop out and could be quite reliable in front of goal if only 30m out or so. The combination worked well in 2019-20 and if it wasn't for fat-arse Porkins he would be a dual premiership player.
Knee injury really set him back IMO.
Gave Nank a chop out and could be quite reliable in front of goal if only 30m out or so. The combination worked well in 2019-20 and if it wasn't for fat-arse Porkins he would be a dual premiership player.
Knee injury really set him back IMO.
