Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
General Discussion / Re: General Soccer discussion.
« Last post by Tiger Khosh on Today at 10:48:24 AM »
They’ve won 5 of their last 6 in all competitions

The loss being a 3-2 classic against united with two cracking strikes for them (tip the cap)

They’ve DEFINITELY steadied

Their dip in form coincided with Gabriel and Saliba missing .. pretty important pair I’d suggest

Are we declaring it a wobble yet? Giving up a 2 goal lead to rock bottom wolves is nasty work.

That’s 2W-4D-1L from the last 7 in the league…..
22
Richmond Rant / Re: Richmond 2026 Leadership Group
« Last post by WilliamPowell on Today at 07:12:37 AM »
Would love to know who is in the "emerging leaders" group

Is that still a thing?

Supposedly, yes
23
Richmond Rant / Re: Favourite player game
« Last post by WilliamPowell on Today at 07:12:11 AM »
Lalor 23
Hotton 32
24
Richmond Rant / Re: Favourite player game
« Last post by 1965 on Today at 04:19:49 AM »

Lalor 22
Hotton 33
25
Richmond Rant / Re: Richmond 2026 Leadership Group
« Last post by Tiger Khosh on Today at 02:19:18 AM »
Would love to know who is in the "emerging leaders" group

Is that still a thing?
26
Richmond Rant / Re: Favourite player game
« Last post by H Tiger on Today at 01:52:33 AM »
Lalor 23
Hotton 32
27
Richmond Rant / What do you need to see from the Tigers this year?
« Last post by one-eyed on Today at 01:15:24 AM »
The TT team discuss what they need to see from the Tigers this year, with responses ranging from increased midfield time for young gun Sam Lalor, Maurice Rioli having a breakout season, through to Seth Campbell taking another step forward in his exciting development.

https://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/1956296/talking-tigers-panel-on-2026-expectations-and-more
28
View from the Outer / AFL commits to Match Review System overhaul (SEN)
« Last post by one-eyed on Today at 01:13:27 AM »
AFL commits to Match Review System overhaul

By Sam Edmund
SEN
18 Feb 2026


The AFL has committed to an overhaul of its match review system, formalising several changes to its judicial process.

The MRO shake-up has been a key order or business for league footy boss Greg Swann, who vowed to crackdown on gut punches in his first week in the job.

After league-wide consultation, the AFL last Thursday wrote to clubs confirming the adjustments.

They include:

* NEW legislation that means players who push opponents in contests into another player from either team will be offered suspensions.

* THE ability to suspend players for less than three weeks even when a player is concussed if there are “other factors relevant to the impact”.

* PLAYERS who gut punch will “usually” be offered a one-match suspension.

Swann told SEN last July he was on a mission to stamp out the off-the-ball act.

“Guys punching guys in the guts — give them a week (suspension),” Swann said.

“It probably has stopped a little bit (this year), but if we did (ban players) then it stops completely.”

But it’s understood the AFL has tempered its initial black and white crackdown.

The prospect of a player missing a Grand Final for a push-off in a contest viewed as a strike or losing a Brownlow under the same circumstance has been among the concerns.

As a result, the explanation of grading impact for intentional strikes now reads: “Intentional strikes to a victim player’s body or head will usually be classified as medium impact at a minimum (resulting in at least a one-match sanction), rather than the previous grading as low impact.”

Coaches and players have long argued the MRO should be given greater flexibility in the matrix when it comes to suspending players whose rough conduct act results in concussion.

The “three weeks or nothing” was a debatable topic throughout 2025, with the likes of Paul Curtis and Justin McInerney considered harshly done by when served with three-week bans.

The “grading for impact” amendment reads: “Whilst an intentional or careless act causing a concussion will usually be graded as severe impact, when other factors relevant to impact, including the observable level of force, are more consistent with a lesser impact grading … a lesser impact grading may be imposed.”

But in approving the change, the AFL commission made it clear that should be a rarity and that a player serving anything less than a three-week ban when another player is concussed might only happen once or twice a season.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2026/02/18/afl-2026-afl-commits-to-match-review-system-overhaul-greg-swann-sam-edmund
29
Richmond Rant / Re: Richmond 2026 Leadership Group
« Last post by WilliamPowell on Yesterday at 09:37:31 PM »
Would love to know who is in the "emerging leaders" group
30
Richmond Rant / Re: Richmond vs Carlton @ the MCG --- Round 1, 2026
« Last post by pmac21 on Yesterday at 08:58:58 PM »
$100 a ticket.  Get f.... afl. 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10