Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Richmond Rant / Re: General preseason training discussion [merged]
« Last post by Andyy on Today at 09:31:25 PM »
Lalor is a freaking monster

Ken oath holy crud
2
Richmond Rant / Re: General preseason training discussion [merged]
« Last post by wayne on Today at 08:27:52 PM »
Lalor is a freaking monster
3
Richmond Rant / Re: General preseason training discussion [merged]
« Last post by Tiger Khosh on Today at 07:14:57 PM »
Surely another injury update is due soon. Would be good to know how everyone’s tracking.
4
Richmond Rant / Re: Favourite player game
« Last post by Wazza on Today at 04:23:45 PM »
Faull          7 -
Gray         14
Lalor        17 +
Hotton     17
5
Richmond Rant / Re: The Stand rule [merged]
« Last post by Simonator on Today at 03:16:49 PM »
Is there clarification on if only 1 player has to stand, or is it all players in the protected zone ?

Does the umpire just pick a player and yell their name to stand ?

I suppose players normally sort it out with each other who is to stand the mark depending on where the ball is on the ground etc.

Geez it’s sad to see the game slowly brought to its knees.
Won’t be long until there’s zones and players have to stay in either the fwd line, midfield or backline

6
Richmond Rant / Re: The Stand rule [merged]
« Last post by JP Tiger on Today at 10:43:42 AM »
As Charlie Brown once said, "Oh, good grief!"

Now the dumbest rule in football gets an extension!  Not only is it a territory gobbling machine, with the new extension it becomes a loose man generator! 

So, what's the go now once a 50mtr penalty has been awarded when the second man in the 5mtr zone moves - does he have to stay in the 5mtr zone & continue to 'stand' with the original man on the mark, or can he move away (& man up)? 

Not so much of a 5mtr exclusion rule ... more of a Bermuda Triangle, dragging footballers down to their death ...     :thumbsdown
7
Richmond Rant / Re: The Stand rule [merged]
« Last post by WilliamPowell on Today at 10:09:30 AM »
The "new" stand rule is going to create massive issues

Scenario: 3 blokes in a tackling contest. 2 from say Richmond, 1 from say N0rt. Umpires plucks out a free to N0rt. Which Richmond player has to stand? How much time for the other player to get out of the protective area? What happens if both players go to leave the protective area becuase the ump has nominated either player to stand? Is that 50 metres? What happens if both stand? Rules says they both can't stand the mark. Is that 50 :huh

A stupid and pathetic rule made even more ridiculous by HQ. Had high hopes we'd get parts of our game back when Swann was appointed but nope, his goal appears to be to ruin it even more. Straight out of the SHocking playbook
8
Richmond Rant / Re: Favourite player game
« Last post by WilliamPowell on Today at 10:01:15 AM »

Faull          8
Gray         14 +
Lalor        16
Hotton     17 -
9
Richmond Rant / Re: Favourite player game
« Last post by mightytiges on Today at 02:59:23 AM »

Armstrong  0 - ...... and out.
Faull          8 +
Gray         13
Lalor        16
Hotton     18
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10