« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 22   Go Down

Author Topic: Schulz to Port  (Read 56438 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98238
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #135 on: October 08, 2009, 10:22:20 PM »
SEN still saying it might not be just a straight swap and picks may be involved but they are confused and aren't sure. Well that helps Finey  :wallywink. 
Logged

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #136 on: October 08, 2009, 10:28:44 PM »
19 + Schulz for Farmer + 16?
Logged

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40311
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #137 on: October 08, 2009, 10:29:47 PM »
SEN apeears to have NO IDEA

and going by what is on the AFL site we aren't the 4th club

Geelong is  ;D
Logged
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline the_boy_jake

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1770
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #138 on: October 08, 2009, 10:41:01 PM »
Quote from: WilliamPowell on October 08, 2009, 10:29:47 PM

Geelong is  ;D

Like I said in the completed trades thread if they've managed to been the 4th party in this and get 40, 42 and 56 for 33 it just shows why they are the best run team in the country right now.
Logged

Online torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5340
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #139 on: October 08, 2009, 11:25:36 PM »
this thread title should be changed!

 :)

Schulz Traded To Port Adelaide

 ;)
Logged

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98238
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #140 on: October 09, 2009, 11:26:50 AM »
Jay Schulz's move to Port Adelaide is confirmed. Richmond receives Mitch Farmer and also pick 72. That's official

http://twitter.com/whitey927
Logged

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #141 on: October 09, 2009, 11:30:34 AM »
Quote from: one-eyed on October 09, 2009, 11:26:50 AM
Jay Schulz's move to Port Adelaide is confirmed. Richmond receives Mitch Farmer and also pick 72. That's official

http://twitter.com/whitey927

Not terrific but a fair deal none the less. Hope Farmer can produce the form he showed in those clips consistently. Will be a very good player for us if he can.
Logged

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #142 on: October 09, 2009, 12:08:36 PM »
Taking pick 72 is a pee take. No point in it and just a complete waste of time.

Result- Fair trade but if Schulz fires at Port then we have lost out.
Logged

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5715
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #143 on: October 09, 2009, 12:31:25 PM »
Josh Free at Pick 72 Ramps?
Logged
Go Tigers!

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #144 on: October 09, 2009, 01:56:26 PM »
Quote from: Ramps on October 09, 2009, 12:08:36 PM
Taking pick 72 is a pee take. No point in it and just a complete waste of time.

Result- Fair trade but if Schulz fires at Port then we have lost out.

No, it's just a fair trade as if Farmer fires at Richmond then they have lost out.

The future is up to us.

Right now this is an entirely fair trade.
Logged
EAT EM ALIVE!

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #145 on: October 09, 2009, 05:43:35 PM »
We'll be using 72 so it's not a waste, plus it will end up being an earlier pick than that after rookies are elevated and clubs pass for the PSD.
Logged

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #146 on: October 09, 2009, 05:53:27 PM »
Quote from: Infamy on October 09, 2009, 05:43:35 PM
We'll be using 72 so it's not a waste, plus it will end up being an earlier pick than that after rookies are elevated and clubs pass for the PSD.

You should do some reaserch Inf and see what players have been picked up at 72 over the last 10 years, it would be interesting to see what is back there or what has been back there. :thumbsup
Logged
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #147 on: October 09, 2009, 05:57:52 PM »
Well Hird was 79, Chris Grant 105, not to mention all the players taken in the PSD and rookie draft

Regardless, Pick 72 as it stands now will still end up being earlier than 72
Logged

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #148 on: October 09, 2009, 06:02:06 PM »
Quote from: Infamy on October 09, 2009, 05:57:52 PM
Well Hird was 79, Chris Grant 105, not to mention all the players taken in the PSD and rookie draft

Regardless, Pick 72 as it stands now will still end up being earlier than 72

So it's really pot luck down there, imagine if we unearthed one of the above mentioned...... :pray
Logged
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Schulz to Port
« Reply #149 on: October 09, 2009, 06:53:56 PM »
Quote from: WA Tiger on October 09, 2009, 05:53:27 PM
Quote from: Infamy on October 09, 2009, 05:43:35 PM
We'll be using 72 so it's not a waste, plus it will end up being an earlier pick than that after rookies are elevated and clubs pass for the PSD.

You should do some reaserch Inf and see what players have been picked up at 72 over the last 10 years, it would be interesting to see what is back there or what has been back there. :thumbsup

Number of picks each year and players of some ability (not necessarily top level) from those picks.  (R) means recycled (I may have missed some of these).

2008 - 9 picks - Leigh Brown (R), Jason Davenport.
2007 - 2 picks - Taylor Walker (NSW Scholarship).
2006 - 10 picks - Andrew Collins, Jesse White, Aaron Edwards (R), David Rodan (R).
2005 - Nil.
2004 - 3 picks - Daniel Pratt.
2003 - 6 picks - Andrew Raines, Shane Tuck.
2002-  3 picks - Brad Fisher.
2001 - 8 picks - Jared Poulton, David Johnson, (Brian Lake went at 71).
2000 - 6 picks - no one of note.
1999 - 17 picks - Ryan Houlihan, Matthew Burton, Ty Zantuck, Trent Hotton.
1998 - 13 picks - Ken McGregor, Ray Hall, Kris Barlow, Rupert Betheras, Shane Clayton, Shannon Motlop.
1997 - 12 picks - Beau McDonald, Guy Rigoni, Richie Vandenburg, Nathan Thompson.
1996 - 19 picks - Anthony Francina, Brad Scott, Josh Mahoney.
1995 - 5 picks - Clint Bizzell.
1994 - 20 picks - Troy Luff, Ben Dixon, Aaron Hammil, Doug Hawkins (R), Simon Arnett, Jade Rawlings.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 22   Go Up
« previous next »