Author Topic: Ben Griffiths [merged]  (Read 459256 times)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1860 on: July 03, 2014, 08:11:34 PM »
doesnt take enough contested marks?

Fast Fact:  Ben Griffiths is ranked equal sixth in the competition for contested marks.

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2014-05-30/richmond-v-essendon-preview
please explain?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1861 on: July 03, 2014, 09:33:57 PM »
If we could get a late second rounder for him we would be winning IMO.
Had long enough. Showed a little in spurts like J. Post but is never going to be what we want, and that's a big, hardworking CHF to make a contest and bring the ball to the deck.
So sick of soft big blokes like this on our list for too long.
He is no J. Schulz.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1862 on: July 03, 2014, 09:55:36 PM »
Had long enough. 200cms are sposed to be a grade at 22,years old is it

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1863 on: July 03, 2014, 10:07:25 PM »
Had long enough. 200cms are sposed to be a grade at 22,years old is it
A grade  :lol
He cannot even get a regular game in our sh/7 side screaming out for a KPF..
Yer it's Dimma's fault.
Give him another 5 years to cement his spot.
And we all wonder why we have been pathetic for so long.

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1864 on: July 03, 2014, 10:14:53 PM »
I agree haas had a heap of chances and no one to blame but himself , just once I'd like to see him grab the stuffen game by the horns , his last two games he had a miserable 3 possies , marvelous  ::)
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1865 on: July 03, 2014, 10:15:48 PM »
My mistake big tone.

Playing mcgaune as first choice. Was the best scenario for long term development of the Richmond football club forward line.

As is playing him behind Aaron bloody Edwards

Bojangles I though you were getting at his game saving mark when the season was still alive

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13216
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1866 on: July 03, 2014, 10:18:04 PM »
McGuane is long gone and Edwards hasn't played much in the ones this year, what's his excuse for this year

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1867 on: July 03, 2014, 10:22:45 PM »
The pointis when he was ssposed to be developed in the ones in the forward line he wasplaying sevounds out of pposition.

So. What the forward line looking like 2015...  :whistle

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1868 on: July 03, 2014, 10:26:49 PM »
My mistake big tone.

Playing mcgaune as first choice. Was the best scenario for long term development of the Richmond football club forward line.

As is playing him behind Aaron bloody Edwards
Says more about Ben than the other two IMO..
Do you genuinely think he will make it as an AFL footballer? Or is it hope because of his size?
I'll tell you right now, he will never make it.. Hasn't got the 'kill or be killed' attitude. And a few tackles doesn't hide that. It takes more than just a few good grabs occasionally.
Just my opinion and I'd be wrapt to be wrong.  :cheers

Offline crackertiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 745
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1869 on: July 03, 2014, 10:49:15 PM »
Will be part of a trade for Higgins who Richmond have been into for a while.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1870 on: July 04, 2014, 12:22:16 AM »
McGuane is long gone and Edwards hasn't played much in the ones this year, what's his excuse for this year

Hampson (pushing Maric forward) and now injury. Also the fact is last few games were poo

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1871 on: July 04, 2014, 05:21:22 AM »
My mistake big tone.

Playing mcgaune as first choice. Was the best scenario for long term development of the Richmond football club forward line.

As is playing him behind Aaron bloody Edwards
Says more about Ben than the other two IMO..
Do you genuinely think he will make it as an AFL footballer? Or is it hope because of his size?
I'll tell you right now, he will never make it.. Hasn't got the 'kill or be killed' attitude. And a few tackles doesn't hide that. It takes more than just a few good grabs occasionally.
Just my opinion and I'd be wrapt to be wrong.  :cheers

I reckon he's a better forward option than aedwards

Ruck hampson

Back Chaplin


I think you will find few 200cm in afl biw and hhistoricaly come good by 22.

I also reckon he will make it at another team

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1872 on: July 04, 2014, 05:55:03 AM »
Will be part of a trade for Higgins who Richmond have been into for a while.

Another injured player coming to Richmond. What a joke  :banghead

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3741
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1873 on: July 04, 2014, 06:38:33 AM »
one criticism I just dont get about griff is the he doesnt want it enough accusation.

What is this based on? When I see a big man that lays 5-6 tackles a game to me that doesnt show a lack of desire or commitment - actually the opposite. The low possession count is concerning but it baffles me hearing this criticism.
Doesn't get to enough contests TM, doesn't clunk enough contested marks, once or twice a game he ll take a towering mark over a garlett or zorco, for mine dosent look to have the appetite ....like others he ll prob make fools of us and become a decent ruck option, that's where I feel his future may be rather than kpp



I agree he doesn't get to the right spots enough, however don't agree with not enough contested marks, wasn't he top 5 or 10 in the league for most of the games he played? Add to that high tackle count and high pressure acts and to me that paints a different picture. The weakness in his game for mine is he doesn't get enough cheap uncontested possessions, most of his are contested - this is because of 1 of 2 reasons - 1) he doesn't work hard enough to get free or  2) combination of him not being used enough by teammates and/or not being smart enough or fit enough with his running patterns.

If he didn't lay a tackle like Vickery I'd say yeah he's probably lazy and doesn't work hard enough like Vickery, but the fact he does all the hard stuff suggests he still needs to learn how to get off the leash a bit more which will just take time (and hopefully a new forward line coach)

Agree

Edited to correct quote
« Last Edit: July 04, 2014, 07:00:38 AM by WilliamPowell »

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Ben Griffiths [merged]
« Reply #1874 on: July 04, 2014, 11:42:58 AM »
Broken again. FRAGILE handle with care  ;D plop plop plop how many years he been at the club. Superstar