« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 19   Go Down

Author Topic: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]  (Read 38216 times)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #150 on: June 18, 2011, 06:26:58 PM »
your cynicism is duly noted...and agreed with.

The Lockett episode was sickening, although in the end i think he was glad to get out of the state with furore surrounding his greyhound partner (mcdonald I think) and the breeding scandle
Logged
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58276
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #151 on: June 18, 2011, 07:10:15 PM »
Quote from: al on June 18, 2011, 06:26:58 PM
your cynicism is duly noted...and agreed with.

The Lockett episode was sickening, although in the end i think he was glad to get out of the state with furore surrounding his greyhound partner (mcdonald I think) and the breeding scandle
From memory the Saints wanted two of our best smalls/mids at the time (1994) with Cambo IIRC being one of them whereas the Swans were able to trade two nobodies or at least not any of their stars.
Logged
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #152 on: June 18, 2011, 10:04:49 PM »
Quote from: mightytiges on June 18, 2011, 07:10:15 PM
Quote from: al on June 18, 2011, 06:26:58 PM
your cynicism is duly noted...and agreed with.

The Lockett episode was sickening, although in the end i think he was glad to get out of the state with furore surrounding his greyhound partner (mcdonald I think) and the breeding scandle
From memory the Saints wanted two of our best smalls/mids at the time (1994) with Cambo IIRC being one of them whereas the Swans were able to trade two nobodies or at least not any of their stars.

daffy and maxfield they wanted
Logged
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #153 on: June 18, 2011, 10:09:01 PM »
Quote from: Dubstep Dookie on June 18, 2011, 07:58:17 AM
I can confirm from a reliable source that we are making a massive play for Scully. Watch this space  :thumbsup

Bloke you were giving a handy to in a public toilet?
Logged
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #154 on: June 18, 2011, 10:10:54 PM »
Quote from: The Big Richo on June 18, 2011, 10:09:01 PM
Quote from: Dubstep Dookie on June 18, 2011, 07:58:17 AM
I can confirm from a reliable source that we are making a massive play for Scully. Watch this space  :thumbsup

Bloke you were giving a handy to in a public toilet?

Just watch  ;)
Logged

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 96301
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #155 on: June 18, 2011, 10:57:49 PM »
Spud Frawley has told Melbourne they should give Scully 4 weeks to make up his mind and if he doesn't then play him in the VFL for the rest of the season as a no answer would mean Scully is going to GWS. Good ol' Spud and his player management lol.
Logged

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #156 on: June 19, 2011, 01:14:01 AM »
Quote from: one-eyed on June 18, 2011, 10:57:49 PM
Spud Frawley has told Melbourne they should give Scully 4 weeks to make up his mind and if he doesn't then play him in the VFL for the rest of the season as a no answer would mean Scully is going to GWS. Good ol' Spud and his player management lol.

You would think they need Scully playing to give them selfs the best chance at making the finals. Its just silly dropping players cause they might be leaving your club. Plus having him play in the 2nds would just hurt bettering there compensation pick if he did leave.
Logged

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #157 on: June 19, 2011, 07:28:49 AM »
Quote from: bojangles17 on June 18, 2011, 10:04:49 PM
Quote from: mightytiges on June 18, 2011, 07:10:15 PM
Quote from: al on June 18, 2011, 06:26:58 PM
your cynicism is duly noted...and agreed with.

The Lockett episode was sickening, although in the end i think he was glad to get out of the state with furore surrounding his greyhound partner (mcdonald I think) and the breeding scandle
From memory the Saints wanted two of our best smalls/mids at the time (1994) with Cambo IIRC being one of them whereas the Swans were able to trade two nobodies or at least not any of their stars.

daffy and maxfield they wanted

My memory is that they wanted one of richo, knights or campbell  plus another player
Logged
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #158 on: June 19, 2011, 11:12:03 AM »
If Scully wanted to be a Tiger from day 1 then he would have snubbed other clubs & showed no interest in playing for them over all his pre draft interviews. Talk of him crying because he didnot get picked by the club he barracks for is just pure crap. Draft pick 1 is the highest honor for these players. Its like being handed a blank cheque.

Scully to Richmond, anything is possible providing he comes to play for the jumper :thumbsup
Logged

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #159 on: June 19, 2011, 01:41:38 PM »
Quote from: al on June 19, 2011, 07:28:49 AM
Quote from: bojangles17 on June 18, 2011, 10:04:49 PM
Quote from: mightytiges on June 18, 2011, 07:10:15 PM
Quote from: al on June 18, 2011, 06:26:58 PM
your cynicism is duly noted...and agreed with.

The Lockett episode was sickening, although in the end i think he was glad to get out of the state with furore surrounding his greyhound partner (mcdonald I think) and the breeding scandle
From memory the Saints wanted two of our best smalls/mids at the time (1994) with Cambo IIRC being one of them whereas the Swans were able to trade two nobodies or at least not any of their stars.

daffy and maxfield they wanted

My memory is that they wanted one of richo, knights or campbell  plus another player

well your memory has fogged up :lol
Logged
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #160 on: June 19, 2011, 02:15:09 PM »
Scully BOG in the first half against Freo
Logged

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5047
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #161 on: June 19, 2011, 02:18:56 PM »
Hey Dooks, you have got me excited with this Scully talk.
Are you able to elaborate on the word you received?
Logged

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #162 on: June 19, 2011, 02:37:10 PM »
Quote from: Dubstep Dookie on June 19, 2011, 02:15:09 PM
Scully BOG in the first half against Freo

yeah his burning today, Frawley saying his the best midfielder going round
Logged

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #163 on: June 19, 2011, 05:02:25 PM »
Quote from: bojangles17 on June 19, 2011, 01:41:38 PM
Quote from: al on June 19, 2011, 07:28:49 AM
Quote from: bojangles17 on June 18, 2011, 10:04:49 PM
Quote from: mightytiges on June 18, 2011, 07:10:15 PM
Quote from: al on June 18, 2011, 06:26:58 PM
your cynicism is duly noted...and agreed with.

The Lockett episode was sickening, although in the end i think he was glad to get out of the state with furore surrounding his greyhound partner (mcdonald I think) and the breeding scandle
From memory the Saints wanted two of our best smalls/mids at the time (1994) with Cambo IIRC being one of them whereas the Swans were able to trade two nobodies or at least not any of their stars.





daffy and maxfield they wanted

My memory is that they wanted one of richo, knights or campbell  plus another player

well your memory has fogged up :lol

;D not beyond the realms of possibility, or it could be yours that is.

I do have a pretty distinct memory of reading in a paper at the time that the saints wanted one of,  a list of three of, our top players, the names i'm so sure about.

It's possible the demands changed during negotiation as well.

No online news articles back then to check..

actually thinking about it if they wanted daffy and maxfield they probably would have been close to a done deal
Logged
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Tom Scully to Richmond in 3-4 years [merged]
« Reply #164 on: June 19, 2011, 05:34:35 PM »
the reality is my friends that our No 1 draft selection will be better than GWS compo.and Melbourne would welcome our interest..and we are only paying 92% of the cap, we could very easily sign him to a 700k pa deal
Logged
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 19   Go Up
« previous next »