The reality of where both players are at is a lot more boring than most care to say.
Heppel has been pretty good player though overrated by a lot of the Melbourne media as the next coming of Pendlebury.
Conca has flown under the radar but is nowhere near as bad as some make out. He too is trekking pretty well.
Conca B-
Heppell B
Well that's one opinion anyway....
Code for not being very good- "flown under the radar"
If Conca is a B- then Heppell is an A grader.
The only player that is overrated in this is Reece Conca. He is a poohouse kick, fumbles more than Mumbles the clown and panics more with the footy in hand than most want to admit.
Conca is by no means our worst player but for a pick 6 he is a massive disappointment.
I don't dislike Conca but reality has to step in occasionally and it's telling me he will be an average player at best that seems to be a good team man and a well like kid by all but just not very good.
Anyway that's my opinion and I'm happy to stand by it.