Author Topic: Reece Conca [merged]  (Read 486383 times)

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2040 on: March 12, 2016, 09:21:11 PM »
None of you lot are real supporters
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14029
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2041 on: March 12, 2016, 09:28:28 PM »
Conca will have more possessions than Heppell this year. Bookmark it! ;D

Yeah but at least Heppell won't turn it over....

:lol
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4801
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2042 on: March 16, 2016, 10:01:30 PM »
Unleash the tornado

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98002
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2043 on: March 16, 2016, 11:39:04 PM »
Tiger's high hamstring injury worse than first thought

Nathan Schmook 
afl.com.au
March 16, 2016


RICHMOND midfielder Reece Conca is likely to miss the first two months of the season after it was revealed his "high" hamstring injury was worse than first thought.

Conca, who suffered the injury during last Thursday night's NAB Challenge clash against Port Adelaide, has now been ruled out for up to 10 weeks by Tigers medical staff.

Richmond was initially optimistic that the 23-year-old has suffered a standard hamstring injury but last Friday stretched his recovery time to eight weeks.

On Wednesday, physical performance manager Peter Burge said scans had revealed the tendon damage on his right leg had occurred high up, which typically leads to an even longer recovery.

Conca suffered three separate hamstring injuries last season and only managed to play three games.

"Reece has got a hamstring injury high up near the tendon, so it's a longer-term process and (he'll be out for) eight to 10 weeks unfortunately," Burge told the club's website. 

"It's on the side that he hasn't hurt before, so we start the rehab process and look forward to getting him back as soon as we can."

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-03-16/conca-blow-tigers-hamstring-injury-worse-than-first-thought

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2044 on: March 17, 2016, 02:23:50 AM »
Good.
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9656
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2045 on: March 17, 2016, 03:44:58 AM »
That means he's straight back in just in time for dreamtime at the G :rollin
The club that keeps giving.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2046 on: March 17, 2016, 04:21:53 AM »
10 weeks gives me a level of comfort. Better than 6 or 8.
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2047 on: March 17, 2016, 07:08:16 AM »
One of our best tacklers.

Hope he has a good run in the magoos to get his confidence up prior to his return. Shouldn't be rushed back like he and Griff were last year in the EF. :banghead
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2048 on: March 17, 2016, 07:09:42 AM »
One of our best tacklers.

Hope he has a good run in the magoos to get his confidence up prior to his return. Shouldn't be rushed back like he and Griff were last year in the EF. :banghead

Standing up tackle on the last line in the practice game was top draw
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2049 on: March 17, 2016, 02:06:24 PM »
If he's out best tackler then no wonder were stuffn rubbish
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2050 on: March 17, 2016, 02:54:47 PM »
If he's out best tackler then no wonder were stuffn rubbish
In 2014, when he played 19 games, he averaged 5.1 tackles per game which was the highest in the team that year. He has not played much since.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19388
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2051 on: March 17, 2016, 03:07:16 PM »
Yeah laid 5 tackles per game, missed 7....
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2052 on: March 17, 2016, 03:11:30 PM »
Conca. Lmao. Never liked him, never would have given him 300k a year. What a pathetic business call. Would have kept Matty White at the club.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2016, 03:40:19 PM by one-eyed »
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2053 on: March 17, 2016, 03:20:51 PM »
Geez some of our supporters are nuts.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2016, 03:40:29 PM by one-eyed »

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Reece Conca [merged]
« Reply #2054 on: March 17, 2016, 03:41:32 PM »
Yeah laid 5 tackles per game, missed 7....
Probably. But others didn't even bother tackling at all. So 5 laid and 7 missed is better than none laid.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.