Reece Conca [merged]

[Tigeritis™©®]

I reckon these two pansies have something going.

The evolution of Dud.

Watch what Conca says about B Ellis is this 100th game tribute video.
Definite chums.
http://m.richmondfc.com.au/video/2016-06-11/fun-facts-ellis
 

[(•))(©™]

Squib and Sniper.

[Raoul Duke]

I love how these experts ride on the back of one average game.....while they do that I am sure we can ride on the back of his MASSIVE "brain fade"...

Conca has had many average games.

As have all the others that have been coached by Hardwick,must be a coincidence.

[🏅Dooks]

I love how these experts ride on the back of one average game.....while they do that I am sure we can ride on the back of his MASSIVE "brain fade"...

And yet, in posting this, you yourself raised for consideration 'have we done the wrong thing by not drafting Trengove'  after a mere half of football.

So what is it? One game is not important or possibly is?

And dont give me the whole 'play the victim' scenario because we are talking about principles not personalities

[Tigeritis™©®]

You can't say bum on this forum?

[🏅Dooks]

Arsenal

[WA Tiger]

I love how these experts ride on the back of one average game.....while they do that I am sure we can ride on the back of his MASSIVE "brain fade"...

And yet, in posting this, you yourself raised for consideration 'have we done the wrong thing by not drafting Trengove'  after a mere half of football.

So what is it? One game is not important or possibly is?

And dont give me the whole 'play the victim' scenario because we are talking about principles not personalities

I was asking a question, not making a statement, you really need to read posts as they are without twisting them. How's this then, have we done the right thing keeping Conco?????

[yellowandback]

I love how these experts ride on the back of one average game.....while they do that I am sure we can ride on the back of his MASSIVE "brain fade"...

Conca has had many average games.

So has Trengove, IIRC was dropped ina bottom 3 team, go figure.

[Chuck17]

I love how these experts ride on the back of one average game.....while they do that I am sure we can ride on the back of his MASSIVE "brain fade"...

Conca has had many average games.

So has Trengove, IIRC was dropped ina bottom 3 team, go figure.

CBF gathering the stats but I would guess Conca is way in front of Trengove.

And yet some people see a 13 stat game and like WHOA it's another failure from the RFC

Go figure

[WA Tiger]

I love how these experts ride on the back of one average game.....while they do that I am sure we can ride on the back of his MASSIVE "brain fade"...

Conca has had many average games.

So has Trengove, IIRC was dropped ina bottom 3 team, go figure.

CBF gathering the stats but I would guess Conca is way in front of Trengove.

And yet some people see a 13 stat game and like WHOA it's another failure from the RFC

Go figure

Stats mean nothing apparently so don't.

Who are these people suggesting RFC failure, who are these villains?

[🏅Dooks]

I love how these experts ride on the back of one average game.....while they do that I am sure we can ride on the back of his MASSIVE "brain fade"...

And yet, in posting this, you yourself raised for consideration 'have we done the wrong thing by not drafting Trengove'  after a mere half of football.

So what is it? One game is not important or possibly is?

And dont give me the whole 'play the victim' scenario because we are talking about principles not personalities

I was asking a question, not making a statement, you really need to read posts as they are without twisting them. How's this then, have we done the right thing keeping Conco?????

Pretty sure you said he was going along pretty well. Seems like a statement. Lets see...

Going along pretty well at the moment, including at the minute against the Pies.... did we miss out here...

But more importantly, as i said, you raised it for consideration.

I will now clarify.

1) Why assume an answer could be formed off half a game for Trengove (and say he is going ok yourself) when 3 days later your bagging other posters out for judging a player (Conca) on a single game occurance? What is the difference and could you please explain it.

What can be deduced by a single game by a single player?

And id like a specific answer please .

[WA Tiger]

I love how these experts ride on the back of one average game.....while they do that I am sure we can ride on the back of his MASSIVE "brain fade"...

And yet, in posting this, you yourself raised for consideration 'have we done the wrong thing by not drafting Trengove'  after a mere half of football.

So what is it? One game is not important or possibly is?

And dont give me the whole 'play the victim' scenario because we are talking about principles not personalities

I was asking a question, not making a statement, you really need to read posts as they are without twisting them. How's this then, have we done the right thing keeping Conco?????

As i said, you raised it for consideration.

I will now clarify.

1) Why assume an answer could be formed off half a game for Trengove, when 3 days later your bagging other posters out for judging a player (Conca) on a single game occurance? What is the difference and could you please explain it.

What can be deduced by a single game by a single player?

And id like a specific answer please .

 

[🏅Dooks]

I love how these experts ride on the back of one average game.....while they do that I am sure we can ride on the back of his MASSIVE "brain fade"...

And yet, in posting this, you yourself raised for consideration 'have we done the wrong thing by not drafting Trengove'  after a mere half of football.

So what is it? One game is not important or possibly is?

And dont give me the whole 'play the victim' scenario because we are talking about principles not personalities

I was asking a question, not making a statement, you really need to read posts as they are without twisting them. How's this then, have we done the right thing keeping Conco?????

As i said, you raised it for consideration.

I will now clarify.

1) Why assume an answer could be formed off half a game for Trengove, when 3 days later your bagging other posters out for judging a player (Conca) on a single game occurance? What is the difference and could you please explain it.

What can be deduced by a single game by a single player?

And id like a specific answer please .

 

Ok then. That was easy!

[WA Tiger]

"And I'd like a specific answer please"

WTF...

[Penelope]

I love how these experts ride on the back of one average game.....while they do that I am sure we can ride on the back of his MASSIVE "brain fade"...

And yet, in posting this, you yourself raised for consideration 'have we done the wrong thing by not drafting Trengove'  after a mere half of football.

So what is it? One game is not important or possibly is?

And dont give me the whole 'play the victim' scenario because we are talking about principles not personalities

I was asking a question, not making a statement, you really need to read posts as they are without twisting them. How's this then, have we done the right thing keeping Conco?????

As i said, you raised it for consideration.

I will now clarify.

1) Why assume an answer could be formed off half a game for Trengove, when 3 days later your bagging other posters out for judging a player (Conca) on a single game occurance? What is the difference and could you please explain it.

What can be deduced by a single game by a single player?

And id like a specific answer please .

 

I laughed too. Clearly it was never to happen