Author Topic: Jake Batchelor [merged]  (Read 199362 times)

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: How is Jake Batchelor travelling?
« Reply #375 on: April 25, 2014, 07:18:13 PM »
Pea heart.

Champions find a way. Even hungry battlers do.

What happened to the qualities of resolve and determination to succeed?

These kids are one big malaise drafted from the teet of plenty.

Soft caulks
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: How is Jake Batchelor travelling?
« Reply #376 on: April 25, 2014, 07:34:52 PM »
;D


Would like to see Batch get another shot at some point. Find it interesting that they put him on the resting ruckman at times. Trying to cough up goals Damien or is there another reason behind it?? Play him as HB, let Chaplin take a tall. Still think he may have something to offer but he really hasn't come on since his first season. Is a better kick than Picky Rettard but so is my nan. And she's dead btw.

Agree coach. Batch was physically mature and ready to go from day dot, I think the focus should have been on him slimming down and working on his speed/agility rather than trying to tank him up further to play on talls. Has made him too slow for footy now.

btw I think he's a good penetrating kick, has no problem hitting 50 metre bullet passes -  just makes some really dumb decisions and unforced errors which stood out
hmm. he was drafted at 188cm / 78kg - 80kg depending on where you got your stats.
today hes 188cm/ 88kg and exactly where he should be give or take a kg.
he is no goliath he is at ideal weight and he has not massively bulked up costing agility and speed. he was always slow regardless of his weight. if we took size and weight off him he would be too small to play at the level.

yes he can kick. it probably was the only thing jackson looked for when drafting him. i know what   critics of his selectiion copped from all and sundry was, but he can kick!!!!!!
slow fumbling players with the turning circle of a mac truck are always going to struggle at afl level no matter how well they can kick. especially ones undersized for the role they have to play. bl he hasnt got  enough physical atrributes to play  tall or small at  afl and he certainly lacks in critical  skill areas.

this bloke could string the rest of the season together and id would still want him out the door. like so many before he is your proverbial glass half full and he will revert to mediocrity. to many weaknesses to sustain a thing at this level.

Disagree regarding weight, his bodyshape is a naturally "heavy set" build if that makes sense. In his first season I saw him physically manhandle Dayne Swan right in front of me, his strength is prodigious and unfortunately those 10 extra kegs have turned him into a blimp. At 78kegs he looked(and played) a lot bigger than say Shedwards does at 80. Anyhow, moot point, hes cooked

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: How is Jake Batchelor travelling?
« Reply #377 on: April 25, 2014, 09:33:06 PM »
By bus
Saw him walking the other day!  Must Have lost his metcard!

You mean his myki. :lol :rollin :lol

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: How is Jake Batchelor travelling?
« Reply #378 on: April 26, 2014, 12:05:49 AM »
By bus
Saw him walking the other day!  Must Have lost his metcard!

You mean his myki. :lol :rollin :lol
Oops!

Thanks.  Too much ouzo! :shh
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: How is Jake Batchelor travelling?
« Reply #379 on: April 27, 2014, 11:59:49 AM »
if they dont rate in the VFL they wont rate in the AFL  ;D

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #380 on: June 08, 2014, 08:25:40 AM »
This guy would be odds on to get delisted at years end. Can't believe the well is that empty that he's getting a game.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #381 on: June 08, 2014, 09:35:11 AM »
Form at Coburg has been really average  :-\

"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #382 on: June 08, 2014, 10:21:36 AM »
Better player than Pettard. Leave him in the side to get some confidence
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #383 on: June 08, 2014, 10:23:51 AM »
Better player than Pettard.

No he's not.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #384 on: June 08, 2014, 10:27:48 AM »
don't know whether its the individual and questionable WORK ethic (something Ive heard whispers about) or whether its the direction the coaching staff set him on to become an undersized KPD, either way his goose is cooked. Shame I rated him and felt he could've been a reasonable long term player.

Have always said, with his build type he needs to slim down and focus on things like pilates, yoga to increase agility, speed and flexibity. He has the turning circle of a mack track and couldn't jump over a jam tin, just looks so heavy

Offline Simonator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3333
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #385 on: June 08, 2014, 10:29:28 AM »
I still reckon hes capable in running Half back role. Shouldnt be key position.

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #386 on: June 08, 2014, 10:30:07 AM »
Better player than Pettard.

No he's not.

Yes he is and if you don't agree your just accepting mediocrity
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #387 on: June 08, 2014, 10:33:33 AM »
Better player than Pettard.

No he's not.

Yes he is and if you don't agree your just accepting mediocrity

No. They're both mediocre but Batch is worse.

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #388 on: June 08, 2014, 11:32:24 AM »
Better player than Pettard.

No he's not.

Yes he is and if you don't agree your just accepting mediocrity

No. They're both mediocre but Batch is worse.

How so?
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #389 on: June 08, 2014, 12:21:45 PM »
Better player than Pettard.

No he's not.

Yes he is and if you don't agree your just accepting mediocrity

No. They're both mediocre but Batch is worse.

How so?
I tend to agree with MM. Petterd has shown he can dominate at VFL level. Last week he played one half and had 20 possessions. I don't think Batch has ever dominated any game.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.