Author Topic: Jake Batchelor [merged]  (Read 200015 times)

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #570 on: March 17, 2015, 06:41:40 PM »
There you go Wat.

And thank you Mr Hawking
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13333
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #571 on: March 17, 2015, 06:45:43 PM »
Well that is a relief and I am so glad that it is sorted

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #572 on: March 17, 2015, 06:55:05 PM »
It's good to see we are now dealing in facts and not speculation. I applaud everyone's transparency on this matter.
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #573 on: March 17, 2015, 07:00:48 PM »
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13333
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #574 on: March 17, 2015, 07:11:26 PM »
 :clapping  :clapping

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5510
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #575 on: March 17, 2015, 08:31:53 PM »
Well that is a relief and I am so glad that it is sorted
Stylo talks in with an American accent, with an electric type sound to it.

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #576 on: March 17, 2015, 09:23:19 PM »
I would like to know if these results were peer reviewed?

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4853
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #577 on: March 17, 2015, 10:20:55 PM »
Wow!! 89.9%! What game was WAT watching again  :lol

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #578 on: March 17, 2015, 10:36:13 PM »
I would like to know if these results were peer reviewed?

Excellent question
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #579 on: March 17, 2015, 11:06:27 PM »
Wow!! 89.9%! What game was WAT watching again  :lol
think it has been determined he has some sort of filter on his telly, so its not really his fault.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Stylo

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 40
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #580 on: March 18, 2015, 01:02:47 AM »
Wow!! 89.9%! What game was WAT watching again  :lol

That's a High Distinction by tertiary education standards

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13333
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #581 on: March 18, 2015, 08:46:07 AM »
except when he slots a goal ?

Did you watch the match on the weekend W.A.?

Batch hit most of his targets and provided as much run off HB as Houli.

Yeah I did and that's absolute crap. He missed nearly all his targets, he hit up one player in the forward line and wow, he kicked one goal. Does not have it at this level, is only there to fill a position, he is nothing special and is NAB/VFL at best.

Here is your original comment if you have forgotten it.

Does missing nearly all his targets equate with a disposal efficiency of 88.9%?

You said something blatantly wrong and been called out about it and you have tried to turn this into your usual baiting and belittlement woe is me squealing

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #582 on: March 18, 2015, 10:28:53 AM »
Maybe you got him mixed up with another player Wat.  Don't get so agro or you will end up tearing your pooper valve, have a heart attack and a stroke all at the same time.  It aint a pretty sight mate.
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #583 on: March 18, 2015, 11:05:31 AM »
except when he slots a goal ?

Did you watch the match on the weekend W.A.?

Batch hit most of his targets and provided as much run off HB as Houli.

Yeah I did and that's absolute crap. He missed nearly all his targets, he hit up one player in the forward line and wow, he kicked one goal. Does not have it at this level, is only there to fill a position, he is nothing special and is NAB/VFL at best.

Here is your original comment if you have forgotten it.

Does missing nearly all his targets equate with a disposal efficiency of 88.9%?

You said something blatantly wrong and been called out about it and you have tried to turn this into your usual baiting and belittlement woe is me squealing

Brilliant, from 8 kicks, wow, all up 9 disposals, Brownlow stuff this. 88.9% from 8 kicks, really, shouldn't that be 100% from that amount of kicks??? The other 10% must have been the crap I was watching being delivered into the forwards, which were way off line apart from one kick that actually hit a forward, however that one mark was contested..

So explain how I am "blatantly wrong"????? I said nearly all his targets were missed!!!! 8th lowest possession gatherer in the team on the day, magnificent!!! Everyone else's fav Morris was third lowest with 4, but what a leader eh!!!

   
                              K  H  D   M  H   O   FF

19Jake Batchelor   8   1   9   3   0   0   1   
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8502
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #584 on: March 18, 2015, 12:36:10 PM »
I'm struggling here, is there any chance we could connect with Stephen Hawking on this?
"The money might have been better. But, at the end of the day, Richmond showed faith in me. It's only fair that now we're 18th on the ladder, I show the faith back in the club and do everything I can to put them in front. In the end, I'm stoked I made the decision to stay. I f***ing love this club”