Author Topic: Jake Batchelor [merged]  (Read 199704 times)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #720 on: August 25, 2015, 08:24:25 AM »

so who in your opinion should replace him?

Dea, Grimes, Castagna, McDonough, Elton, but just like Newman Hardwick has his favourites so they will always stay!! Batch and Morris are another two favourites!!!

Ever thought he's getting a game before all these guys (except for Grimes because he's played along side Batchelor most of the season) because he's actualy better than them?
Imagin how McDonough would have gone against Cloke on the weekend :lol

WTF, How the hell did you get the idea he was on Cloke??????? Were you watching your own game again down there or perhaps the rerun from years ago... :huh :huh :huh

Do you have TV there??
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4853
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #721 on: August 25, 2015, 09:00:57 AM »
I happens to actualy be at the game and while he may have not of started on Cloke at the center bounce there we're many occasions where Batchelour was left one on one with Cloke.
Even watching the replay on tv you will see that.
Amazing what you notice when you actualy go to a game😉

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #722 on: August 25, 2015, 09:12:52 AM »
I just don't get the hate. I can't understand how anyone can mount a serious argument to the effect that he's a dud.

 At worst one might say he's serviceable. But I think he's usually been a level above serviceable (handy?) and floating between the two. An important team cog.
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline scjhammo

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 232
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #723 on: August 25, 2015, 09:28:57 AM »
NOTHING WORNG WITH bATCH EVEN THU HE LOOKS LIKE HE IS GOING HALF PACE ALL THE TIME HE IS BLOSSOMING INTO A STRONG BACK 6 FOR US :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup
GO U TIGERS

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 41250
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #724 on: August 25, 2015, 10:09:55 AM »
SNIP AGAIN  :banghead

Which part of final warning do people not understand   :banghead

Constant baiting of other posters will not be tolerated, those on multiple strikes should be accutely aware that another strike and they are off OER PERMANANTLY

And one final and I emphasise FINAL reminder, posting on the forum that other posters deserve a strike or posting comments such as "enjoy your holiday" can also result that poster facing a strike being themsleves

See: http://oneeyed-richmond.com/forum/index.php?topic=17325.msg352746#msg352746 (near the end)

For those who are using the "report to moderator" function you are doing the correct thing. But to then post comments after reporting simply because we (mods) haven't been on the site to deal with the posts reported is not acceptable either.

As we have said many times we cannot be on the site 24/7. FWIW I am currently at work so I have limited time available to be on the site. However, when we are here we deal with things, it would be appreciated if people could consider that if and when you think we are too slow in repsonding to complaints

Finally, I am not interested in who started it, the standard finger pointing or the simple "it's not my fault" lines of defence, facts are stirkes will be issued if it continues

WP & OE
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4853
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #725 on: August 25, 2015, 10:13:59 AM »
Thank you WP, it must be tough being a mod sometimes.
I apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Cheers

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #726 on: August 25, 2015, 10:44:21 AM »
l will make it easy for you all to understand. Football is played more of who has what in the tank. A defender can go from defence to inside 50 following his opponent & back again within 90 seconds that the ball is moved that quickly. Sometime the defender is so worn out that when they do dispose of the ball it falls short of the target. l have seen Batchlor hit players on the wing lace out from 50 metres which he does in most games. if l remember rightly from where l was sitting he pinned someone perfect from defence to near the interchange with opposition either side of that player it was perfect timed kick for that distance. It takes time to build a team to win a premiership & then it must go to plan on that big day which hundreds of times teams go through a season undefeated to lose the most important game the grand final. If players are sore & worn out in todays game they are forced to make errors. That is the plan of running your opponent out of breathe. Why do you think they use interchange so often. You can have a different opponent 4 times within 10 minutes so the AFL cut the interchange. Football is not the same as it was 10-15-20 years ago. Its super fast & players are so fatigued they make mistakes. Rance, Chaplin, Batchlor, Vlaustin, Newman, Grymes, who then have players like B Ellis, Deledio, Cotchen, Maric, Vickery, Griffiths, Rewoldt, Martin, dropping back so again its the forwards who are running from forward to defence & back all within 90 seconds or less. It take a elite group of players to do that & pull it off properly. This is why skills drop in the AFL over the years. This is why forwards miss easy goals your everyday footballer miss because of fatigue. Our players are very fit & this is why its hard to bring players up from reserves to the next level cause its a whole different game plan & alot faster or loads more running. This is what our club lacked over the years, But now we have the facilities to train harder that the results come with it. So in saying all this if your at the game you see the whole picture of how much ground these players cover & how quick they cover it. There is really no term of defender / forward now days. They are all over the ground. So going back to Batchlor & watching him play & follow him you will see he is a major part of that backline & this lad does have alot of skill & good size. Go stand next to him, He ain't no small 3rd defender who plays on smaller forwards. He takes Rance & Chaplin opponent often. So don't look at football how we played it. Look at football as it is played & coached today. They are elite atheltic players who can play almost any position bar the ruck. But look at how the big men play like Maric, Vickery, Griffiths. They even rove their own ball. The Richmond backline is becoming the most elite in the AFL today & Batchlor plays a huge part of that.  ;D

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #727 on: August 25, 2015, 10:52:08 AM »
 :huh
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #728 on: August 25, 2015, 10:54:47 AM »
Unreal, just for defending my stance!!
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #729 on: August 25, 2015, 11:39:58 AM »
Unreal, just for defending my stance!!

if only your view was not wrong  :shh
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8502
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #730 on: August 25, 2015, 12:36:00 PM »
I just don't get the hate. I can't understand how anyone can mount a serious argument to the effect that he's a dud.

 At worst one might say he's serviceable. But I think he's usually been a level above serviceable (handy?) and floating between the two. An important team cog.

Nice post Dooks  :cheers
"The money might have been better. But, at the end of the day, Richmond showed faith in me. It's only fair that now we're 18th on the ladder, I show the faith back in the club and do everything I can to put them in front. In the end, I'm stoked I made the decision to stay. I f***ing love this club”

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #731 on: August 25, 2015, 01:21:23 PM »
I don't get it either.
I understand it toward newman, conca, Ellis etc....
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #732 on: August 25, 2015, 06:44:06 PM »
As we have said many times we cannot be on the site 24/7. FWIW I am currently at work so I have limited time available to be on the site. However, when we are here we deal with things, it would be appreciated if people could consider that if and when you think we are too slow in repsonding to complaints


Ever thought of another mod?

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #733 on: August 25, 2015, 09:44:13 PM »

so who in your opinion should replace him?

Dea, Grimes, Castagna, McDonough, Elton, but just like Newman Hardwick has his favourites so they will always stay!! Batch and Morris are another two favourites!!!

Ever thought he's getting a game before all these guys (except for Grimes because he's played along side Batchelor most of the season) because he's actualy better than them?
Imagin how McDonough would have gone against Cloke on the weekend :lol

WTF, How the hell did you get the idea he was on Cloke??????? Were you watching your own game again down there or perhaps the rerun from years ago... :huh :huh :huh

Do you have TV there??

Didn't play on Cloke but due to Rance running off his man he was one on one with Cloke and with Moore a few times in the second and he was better than break even and got the crumb going to the advantage of Houli and Chaplain.

Wasn't on TV happened right in front of me sitting on bottom level on M6.

Important part of our back 6 nowadays. :thumbsup


Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jake Batchelor [merged]
« Reply #734 on: September 04, 2015, 08:50:13 PM »
Are you kidding me with this guy. Couldn't even Shepard  :banghead
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"