Australian Politics thread [merged]

[1965]

Yes just did another check - pounded, rebounded and now another whack

Its worth jumping on a few shares at the moment though. Few bargains out there IMO. IMF has said AUD is 10-20% over valued.

"There is ample scope to cut the policy interest rate and provide liquidity support for banks," the IMF said in its annual health check of the Australian economy.

It said the Australian dollar AUD=D4 was overvalued somewhere between 10 and 20 percent

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/06/imf-australia-idUSN1E77503220110806

Typical Lib voter, happy to make a quick buck no matter the cost.

 

[tiger101]

Yes just did another check - pounded, rebounded and now another whack

Its worth jumping on a few shares at the moment though. Few bargains out there IMO. IMF has said AUD is 10-20% over valued.

"There is ample scope to cut the policy interest rate and provide liquidity support for banks," the IMF said in its annual health check of the Australian economy.

It said the Australian dollar AUD=D4 was overvalued somewhere between 10 and 20 percent

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/06/imf-australia-idUSN1E77503220110806

Typical Lib voter, happy to make a quick buck no matter the cost.

 

What are you on about? Im sure people who trade on the share market vote labor as well. Are you saying everyone that has super invested in shares are a lib voter?  Unbelievable.

[1965]

Its worth jumping on a few shares at the moment though. Few bargains out there IMO. IMF has said AUD is 10-20% over valued.

"There is ample scope to cut the policy interest rate and provide liquidity support for banks," the IMF said in its annual health check of the Australian economy.

It said the Australian dollar AUD=D4 was overvalued somewhere between 10 and 20 percent

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/06/imf-australia-idUSN1E77503220110806

Typical Lib voter, happy to make a quick buck no matter the cost.

 

What are you on about? Im sure people who trade on the share market vote labor as well. Are you saying everyone that has super invested in shares are a lib voter?  Unbelievable.

"jumping on a few shares at the moment " is hardly something that you can do with superannuation.

More lies and duplicity. (and yes I am aware of the tautology)

 

[tiger101]

"jumping on a few shares at the moment " is hardly something that you can do with superannuation.

More lies and duplicity. (and yes I am aware of the tautology)

 

No offense but your actually criticising your own side of supporters by saying only libs(I can only guess because you mean they have more financial intellect because there is no other reason why you would say it)invest in shares when the market has been down and the bargains are about. Also I'll just like to state that trading shares is a legal practise.

[1965]

"jumping on a few shares at the moment " is hardly something that you can do with superannuation.

More lies and duplicity. (and yes I am aware of the tautology)

 

No offense but your actually criticising your own side of supporters by saying only libs(I can only guess because you mean they have more financial intellect because there is no other reason why you would say it)invest in shares when the market has been down and the bargains are about. Also I'll just like to state that trading shares is a legal practise.

You really have no idea but the common man do you?

 

[tiger101]

"jumping on a few shares at the moment " is hardly something that you can do with superannuation.

More lies and duplicity. (and yes I am aware of the tautology)

 

No offense but your actually criticising your own side of supporters by saying only libs(I can only guess because you mean they have more financial intellect because there is no other reason why you would say it)invest in shares when the market has been down and the bargains are about. Also I'll just like to state that trading shares is a legal practise.

You really have no idea but the common man do you?

 

Well I think the common person like's buying bargains but apparently according to you only lib voters buy bargains.

[1965]

"jumping on a few shares at the moment " is hardly something that you can do with superannuation.

More lies and duplicity. (and yes I am aware of the tautology)

 

No offense but your actually criticising your own side of supporters by saying only libs(I can only guess because you mean they have more financial intellect because there is no other reason why you would say it)invest in shares when the market has been down and the bargains are about. Also I'll just like to state that trading shares is a legal practise.

You really have no idea but the common man do you?

 

Well I think the common person like's buying bargains but apparently according to you only lib voters buy bargains.

 

[tiger101]

I'm not evening going to keep on asking what you ment by the comment because I don't even think you do. Seeing how you won't explain what you ment by saying lib voters are out to make money. I would of thought everyone is out to make money isn't that the one of the main foundations of union's these days to make sure employee's make the most they can.

[1965]

I'm not evening going to keep on asking what you ment by the comment because I don't even think you do. Seeing how you won't explain what you ment by saying lib voters are out to make money. I would of thought everyone is out to make money isn't that the one of the main foundations of union's these days to make sure employee's make the most they can.

Simply put (and yes I am a simple man)

Labor voters are salt of the earth working class citzens, faced with a global crisis they think "will I be able to feed the kids".

Liberal voters are business people who just want to make money out of other people's misfortune.

Labor voters can't afford shares whereas liberal voters first thought while being faced with a global crisis is "how can I make money out of this"

There you go a couple of broad sweeping generalisations for you to get stuck into.

 

[tiger101]

I'm not evening going to keep on asking what you ment by the comment because I don't even think you do. Seeing how you won't explain what you ment by saying lib voters are out to make money. I would of thought everyone is out to make money isn't that the one of the main foundations of union's these days to make sure employee's make the most they can.

Simply put (and yes I am a simple man)

Labor voters are salt of the earth working class citzens, faced with a global crisis they think "will I be able to feed the kids".

Liberal voters are business people who just want to make money out of other people's misfortune.

Labor voters can't afford shares whereas liberal voters first thought while being faced with a global crisis is "how can I make money out of this"

There you go a couple of broad sweeping generalisations for you to get stuck into.

 

What a load of rubbish. Sadly it just shows your ignorance and naivety. I can tell you now liberal votes do care about feeding there kids just as much as any one. Liberals was in power for over a decade less then 4 years ago. There in power in 3 states across this country. Currently leading in the polls federally.

[1965]

I'm not evening going to keep on asking what you ment by the comment because I don't even think you do. Seeing how you won't explain what you ment by saying lib voters are out to make money. I would of thought everyone is out to make money isn't that the one of the main foundations of union's these days to make sure employee's make the most they can.

Simply put (and yes I am a simple man)

Labor voters are salt of the earth working class citzens, faced with a global crisis they think "will I be able to feed the kids".

Liberal voters are business people who just want to make money out of other people's misfortune.

Labor voters can't afford shares whereas liberal voters first thought while being faced with a global crisis is "how can I make money out of this"

There you go a couple of broad sweeping generalisations for you to get stuck into.

 

 Currently leading in the polls federally.

Good point there.

They are currently leading the polls.

Pity the election is still more than two years away.

 

[1965]

We are in the middle of a major financial meltdown and where is Mr Abbott again?

That's right, he is on holidays.

Good luck to him, way to get your priorities right.

 

[WilliamPowell]

We are in the middle of a major financial meltdown and where is Mr Abbott again?

That's right, he is on holidays.

Good luck to him, way to get your priorities right.

 

I think everybody knows my disdain for Abbott but seriously what exactly do you think he could do if he was here 

Same applies to the govt - what can they do exactly right now? The share market is not run by the govt or opposition

[1965]

I think everybody knows my disdain for Abbott but seriously what exactly do you think he could do if he was here  

Same applies to the govt - what can they do exactly right now? The share market is not run by the govt or opposition

I think he would blame the crisis on the Gillard government and it's big new toxic tax.

and I have no doubt he would talk about stopping the boats in the same sentence.

I miss the evil little man.

 

[tiger101]

We are in the middle of a major financial meltdown and where is Mr Abbott again?

That's right, he is on holidays.

Good luck to him, way to get your priorities right.

 

What do you think WP do you agree with 1965 that lib voters don't care about feeding there family they rather make a quick dollar instead.
False beliefs like that only discredits any creditability of any past or future comment they make on politics IMO.
 

I think everybody knows my disdain for Abbott but seriously what exactly do you think he could do if he was here 

Same applies to the govt - what can they do exactly right now? The share market is not run by the govt or opposition