Author Topic: Nathan Foley [merged]  (Read 126316 times)

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Bowden pulled that crap for most of his career under several coaches.

Kel Moore's 2008 was his best year, but still wasn't as great as made out by some and Thursield was comfortably better

I recall Jackson & Tuck both racking up the possessions in 2009 because oppositions allowed them to, as they weren't a threat. B&F results mean stuff all to me.

Never said Tambling was ever going to "reach expectations". Clearly he wasn't.

We stood up under pressure in the last quarter in at least 5 games that year - more than we have during Hardwick's entire reign.

Jackson was playing as a tagger :lol and did it well I might add. He was rubbish for the next 3 seasons.

Can you name the 5 games? I don't really remember them that clearly. I certainly don't remember us playing finals in 2008.

Absolutely laughable to say Thursty was better than Moore that year. Moore took the best defender each week and did good jobs on the likes of Franklin & Jono Brown.

The opposition allowed Shane Tuck to rack up possessions? And here I was thinking he won mostly contested ball his entire career.

Bowden's crap got him in AA squads and won him B&Fs. I do agree that some B&F results can be dodgy but you don't finish top 5 almost every year like Bowdo did unless you can play.

 - IIRC in 2009, Jackson & Tuck both regularly racked up 20+ possesions. Stats may well contradict this, but that is my recollection. Opposition sides knew their disposal was not damaging and often even favourable to them.

- Off the top off my head Brisbane at Docklands, Port at AAMI , Essendon second match, Carlton round one(?). thats 4. Sure there was another one or two. I'm talking about last quarter efforts, not our overall performances.

- Thursfield was last pure stopper we had and was a rock on the last line - yes he wasn't much of an attacker, but he was servicable and excelled in his primary roll. He was rarely caught out of position. Moore was descent rebounder and he had a few high-profile wins but with the ball coming in he had no idea was far too often left trailing in his opponents wake or nowhere near it. Like Rance the further from goal he played the better he was, we haven't had as reliable a mark on the flanks until Ellis came along, but I maintain my opinion that as a defender he wasn't nearly as good as many claim. .

Bowden was a quality talent, only a fool would deny, my problem with him was the amount of times he took the soft option and played unaccountable football. He didn't take the game on nearly enough , particularly from defence and would often ignore blatant options and teammtes in space or running past with a paddock in front of them and effectively kill our run, holding onto the ball, chipping it around and generally kicking every which way but forward.

My opinions were in regards to a few specific things, not an extended commentary meant to imply Wallace was a better coach than Hardwick or that we were overall a better side in 2008 than now.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2014, 07:23:44 PM by one-eyed »
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Bowden pulled that crap for most of his career under several coaches.

Kel Moore's 2008 was his best year, but still wasn't as great as made out by some and Thursield was comfortably better

I recall Jackson & Tuck both racking up the possessions in 2009 because oppositions allowed them to, as they weren't a threat. B&F results mean stuff all to me.

Never said Tambling was ever going to "reach expectations". Clearly he wasn't.

We stood up under pressure in the last quarter in at least 5 games that year - more than we have during Hardwick's entire reign.

Jackson was playing as a tagger :lol and did it well I might add. He was rubbish for the next 3 seasons.

Can you name the 5 games? I don't really remember them that clearly. I certainly don't remember us playing finals in 2008.

Absolutely laughable to say Thursty was better than Moore that year. Moore took the best defender each week and did good jobs on the likes of Franklin & Jono Brown.

The opposition allowed Shane Tuck to rack up possessions? And here I was thinking he won mostly contested ball his entire career.

Bowden's crap got him in AA squads and won him B&Fs. I do agree that some B&F results can be dodgy but you don't finish top 5 almost every year like Bowdo did unless you can play.

 - IIRC in 2009, Jackson & Tuck both regularly racked up 20+ possesions. Stats may well contradict this, but that is my recollection. Opposition sides knew their disposal was not damaging and often even favourable to them.

- Off the top off my head Brisbane at Docklands, Port at AAMI , Essendon second match, Carlton round one(?). thats 4. Sure there was another one or two. I'm talking about last quarter efforts, not our overall performances.

- Thursfield was last pure stopper we had and was a rock on the last line - yes he wasn't much of an attacker, but he was servicable and excelled in his primary roll. He was rarely caught out of position. Moore was descent rebounder and he had a few high-profile wins but with the ball coming in he had no idea was far too often left trailing in his opponents wake or nowhere near it. Like Rance the further from goal he played the better he was, we haven't had as reliable a mark on the flanks until Ellis came along, but I maintain my opinion that as a defender he wasn't nearly as good as many claim. .

Bowden was a quality talent, only a fool would deny, my problem with him was the amount of times he took the soft option and played unaccountable football. He didn't take the game on nearly enough , particularly from defence and would often ignore blatant options and teammtes in space or running past with a paddock in front of them and effectively kill our run, holding onto the ball, chipping it around and generally kicking every which way but forward.

My opinions were in regards to a few specific things, not an extended commentary meant to imply Wallace was a better coach than Hardwick or that we were overall a better side in 2008 than now.

Fair enough. Agree to disagree.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2014, 07:24:26 PM by one-eyed »

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Brett also thought we would win last nite, no doubt
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Snip! Leave out the personal insults and stick to the topics!   :banghead

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Hate it when I miss what was snipped.

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Don't water the rocks
Hate it when I miss what was snipped.

 :lol
Yeah we're already going to vote for him mate, you don't need to keep selling it.....

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
After Brett's teary episode on the footy show last year I won't be taking much notice of anything he says lads

Good player yes but great with words. Negative

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
After Brett's teary episode on the footy show last year I won't be taking much notice of anything he says lads

Good player yes but great with words. Negative

Do u mean his articulation is reprehensible ?
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Hate it when I miss what was snipped.
Nothing worse than missing a good snipping.  >:(

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1164 on: February 27, 2014, 02:10:57 PM »
Foley fit and ready to fire
richmondfc.com.au 
February 27, 2014


A rare uninterrupted pre-season could be the catalyst for Richmond’s valuable veteran midfielder Nathan Foley returning to his best form in 2014.

It’s been nice to pretty much do 100 percent of the pre-season.  It’s been a tough pre-season, the boys have worked really hard, and I’ve been lucky enough to get most of it out, which has been a really good result,” Foley said.

Read more at: http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2014-02-27/foley-fit-and-ready-to-fire

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1165 on: February 28, 2014, 09:37:03 AM »
Go Foley,.... :clapping
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1166 on: February 28, 2014, 10:14:51 AM »
I think I remember this guy.

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1167 on: February 28, 2014, 10:54:32 AM »
Think Miles (or Thomas) will take his spot in the team by years end

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1168 on: February 28, 2014, 10:59:26 AM »
He doesn't have a spot to lose in the 22, he lost it last year


Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1169 on: February 28, 2014, 11:07:23 AM »
He doesn't have a spot to lose in the 22, he lost it last year

Fair call. Then he will be competing with these two guys for Tucks spot and will need to step up significantly to go past them. On preseason form (yes I know its just preseason but), in the same team, both Miles and Thomas showed more upside than Foley.