Author Topic: Nathan Foley [merged]  (Read 144580 times)

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14231
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #555 on: May 01, 2011, 07:36:03 PM »
What is seriously wrong with some of you people.

Foley played a great game for someone who has only played 5 games in a few years.

His contested possessions were back and he is slowly getting back to where he belongs. He helped set up quite a few goals and thats all you can ask for.

I find it hilarious how some find faults in Foley's game yet defend Edwards this year till the cows come home. It doesn't make any sense but then again it is X, so no suprises as he probably couldn't see over the fence.





Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #556 on: May 01, 2011, 08:06:40 PM »
 :lol
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #557 on: May 01, 2011, 09:37:28 PM »
40 possessions at 83% effectiveness with 8 clearances plus 4 tackles.
16 contested 28 uncontested.

Stupid post.

I am interested to know how they define "effectiveness" & "clangers" to be honest?

Because if you mark the ball and then play on (stupidly) and as you are getting tackled you handball the thing to the ground so you dont' get pinged for holding the ball and it ends up being a ball up what is it? How is that classified? It's not a clanger and IMHO it isn't effective, it is a "nothing" so how does that impact a players stats?

He directly set up our first 2 goals.  Watch it if you don't believe me. 

And unfortunately in the 3rd qtr he directly set up at least 2 goals for the Lions when they had their run on so they almost cancel one another out to be honest

Look I thought as the game went on Foley got a lot better but some of his "nothing" disposals as I call them hurt us.

The 40 odd touches didn't impress me as much as Guy McKenna but then again Guy has much bigger things to worry about then I do  :rollin



well said WP im with u all the way

foley gets alot of the ball, but most of his touches are crap, he lacks quality touches and many of his touches hurt us

Online Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5234
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #558 on: May 01, 2011, 09:47:15 PM »

well said WP im with u all the way

foley gets alot of the ball, but most of his touches are crap, he lacks quality touches and many of his touches hurt us

hardly.
Foley, at his best, wins plenty of contested possessions. These are not 'crap touches.' He also has very quick hands, which is a crucial attribute for a mid. You've clearly got preconceptions about him that are informing your judgments. He had an excellent game, especially considering where he's come from.

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #559 on: May 01, 2011, 09:53:27 PM »
he comes from colac and is overrated
he looks good but isnt , we must use him in a trade to get scully

Online TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5851
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #560 on: May 01, 2011, 09:58:39 PM »
he comes from colac and is overrated
he looks good but isnt , we must use him in a trade to get scully

Your opinion is just dumb.

Go Tigers!

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 41151
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #561 on: May 01, 2011, 10:22:19 PM »
Snip  >:(

Insults - OUT

Discussion - IN
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #562 on: May 01, 2011, 10:38:35 PM »
he comes from colac and is overrated
he looks good but isnt , we must use him in a trade to get scully

Your opinion is just dumb.



and ur opinion is oh so intelligent  :bow

Online TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5851
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #563 on: May 01, 2011, 10:46:46 PM »
he comes from colac and is overrated
he looks good but isnt , we must use him in a trade to get scully

Your opinion is just dumb.



and ur opinion is oh so intelligent  :bow

You didn't honestly expect to come on here bag our Vice Captain after a decent game by the standards of a player missing 18 months of football, and think everyone would agree?

Your opinion might have more weight if it was in he back if a poor game.
Go Tigers!

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100216
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Nathan Foley feels like 'a new first-round pick' (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #564 on: May 02, 2011, 12:37:32 AM »
Richmond midfielder Nathan Foley feels like 'a new first-round pick'

    Matt Windley
    From: Herald Sun
    May 02, 2011


RICHMOND defender Brett Deledio likens teammate Nathan Foley to a new first-round draft pick.

Foley played only four games last year while battling calf, ankle and achilles injuries, but has played in each of the club's six games this year.

His 40 possessions in the Tigers' 26-point win against the Brisbane Lions at the MCG on Saturday night constituted his best game of the season, and Deledio said the club was all the better for his return.

"He's like a first-round draft pick for us, pretty much," Deledio said.

"He's come back in and had 40 possessions last night. He's slowly getting back in to it. He's going to be great for us."

Teammate Trent Cotchin described the win as the most complete game the Tigers had played this season.

"We're a young group. We've been playing some reasonable footy in patches, but last night was probably our most full game," Cotchin said on Channel 7's GameDay.

"I think we probably played three decent quarters, let them back in the third quarter, but it was just nice to play a more full game and really see how we want to play for the coming weeks.

"I suppose from those first few games against top sides, when the pressure comes - and Brisbane were able to do that in the third quarter - we were able to settle it down in the last quarter and play a really good game."

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/richmond-midfielder-like-a-new-first-round-pick/story-e6frf9jf-1226047957761

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #565 on: May 02, 2011, 01:54:36 AM »
he comes from colac and is overrated
he looks good but isnt , we must use him in a trade to get scully

Your opinion is just dumb.



and ur opinion is oh so intelligent  :bow
I've yet to see a post from you that isn't dripping in negativity.  Lighten up.

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #566 on: May 02, 2011, 04:22:16 AM »
he comes from colac and is overrated
he looks good but isnt , we must use him in a trade to get scully

Your opinion is just dumb.



and ur opinion is oh so intelligent  :bow
I've yet to see a post from you that isn't dripping in negativity.  Lighten up.

maybe cause his posts are full of lies  ;D

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #567 on: May 02, 2011, 04:23:55 AM »
Foley played ok   ;D was running very well

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14231
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #568 on: May 02, 2011, 09:45:08 AM »
he comes from colac and is overrated
he looks good but isnt , we must use him in a trade to get scully

Your opinion is just dumb.



and ur opinion is oh so intelligent  :bow
I've yet to see a post from you that isn't dripping in negativity.  Lighten up.

maybe cause his posts are full of lies  ;D

Back to the topic.

I thought Foley did great on the weekend and is improving as each game passes, but let me say this if we can get Scully(Fit Scully) would you guys seriously consider it.

A fit Scully would be the last ingredient for a premiership midfield IMO then who cares if Griff and others dont come on. Geelong proved if you have the midfield every thing else will take care of itself.

Just throwing it out there but ideally if we could hold Axel, and gain Scully with our first pick and that Tambling pick then we are in business.

Good to dream but if we continue our rise and throw the kitchen sink at Scully, its going to be real hard for his Richmond mad family to pass up, especially if the Dees continue to go backwards



Edited: keep the personal stuff off the forum  :banghead

« Last Edit: May 02, 2011, 10:40:55 AM by WilliamPowell »
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #569 on: May 02, 2011, 09:48:24 AM »
I'd rather wait 4 years and see if we can get him under free agency