Author Topic: Nathan Foley [merged]  (Read 146091 times)

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #645 on: May 13, 2012, 12:41:47 AM »
today he was a ripper, not the past three weeks. dont look at how many touches he gets but what he does with it

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #646 on: May 13, 2012, 01:45:01 AM »
I always watch what players do with it rather than just read the stats, he's been breaking lines and bursting away from packs giving our midfield another dimension.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13333
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #647 on: May 13, 2012, 07:30:11 AM »
on ya Foley, carving them up, glad he still has his pace after those injuries

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #648 on: May 13, 2012, 08:03:28 AM »

I always watch what players do with it rather than just read the stats, he's been breaking lines and bursting away from packs giving our midfield another dimension.
I,ve always believed that when on song he gives us good drive. He showed that yesterday for three quarters. Was very important in the win.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #649 on: May 13, 2012, 08:24:24 AM »
Thought he was our best player to half time.

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3896
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #650 on: May 13, 2012, 08:50:40 AM »
his first quarter was outstanding and was one of the main reasons we completely dominated that quarter

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #651 on: May 13, 2012, 10:47:44 AM »
Uncontracted  :shh

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #652 on: May 13, 2012, 10:48:58 AM »
given nathans good form are people here still wanting to trade him ?

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #653 on: May 13, 2012, 11:58:56 AM »
Foley is very important to this team, get off the trade him bloody bandwagon and get on the support him wagon. He is still only 25 and part of the future..
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13333
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #654 on: May 13, 2012, 12:00:51 PM »
given nathans good form are people here still wanting to trade him ?

If the price was right, sure.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #655 on: May 13, 2012, 12:02:59 PM »
i suppose everyone is tradable for the right price.
what would say is the right price for foley, Chuck?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13333
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #656 on: May 13, 2012, 12:07:53 PM »
i suppose everyone is tradable for the right price.
what would say is the right price for foley, Chuck?

Forget his age, but a low second rounder maybe,  mid to high first rounder would be good but dont think that would happen.

When he loses his pace he cant play up forward, it would be a matter of timing the trade right.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #657 on: May 13, 2012, 12:11:54 PM »
i reckon i'd want a bit more than that right now. it may be about his worth on the market, but he's probably more valuable to us at the moment.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #658 on: May 13, 2012, 12:19:47 PM »
I wouldn't trade him for a pick 20-30 no way

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #659 on: May 13, 2012, 12:23:13 PM »
Yeah let's trade him,  >:(just watching the highlights on the footy show and the entire panel are talking him up with the rest of our midfield.....

Yep let's trade him and keep Edwards......clowns..... :banghead

Why the hell would you trade away our midfield players that are doing so well together, ridiculous.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"