Author Topic: Nathan Foley [merged]  (Read 145947 times)

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #960 on: April 11, 2013, 09:17:02 AM »
 Great points Smokey!

Everyone seems in such a hurry to get Vlaustin in to the side but he is (and should be) behind Knights and Foley at this stage. He is a quality youth but I don't elieve his consistent output could match the other two at this point. Maybe give him a game around mud year IMO. Unless we urgently need a tagged and no one else can do the job, Jackson needs to make way and on current form Newman is at risk.

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #961 on: April 11, 2013, 09:47:50 AM »
Flossy will be lucky to play 5 games this year

Foley, Knighta, Helbig, Arnot, Dea, White, Nahas all pushing hard for a spots  :cheers

Wouldn't want to turn in a couple of poor performances in the 1s

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #962 on: April 11, 2013, 10:53:26 AM »
Great points Smokey!

Everyone seems in such a hurry to get Vlaustin in to the side but he is (and should be) behind Knights and Foley at this stage. He is a quality youth but I don't elieve his consistent output could match the other two at this point. Maybe give him a game around mud year IMO. Unless we urgently need a tagged and no one else can do the job, Jackson needs to make way and on current form Newman is at risk.

Nothing to do with being in a hurry to get him in, just that I think he's good enough to be best 22 already.  Im sure he'll get his chance sooner rather than later, just like Foley, Knights, Helbig etc.

I just hope that everyone is treated equally and coach favourites dont get games undeserved. On form Jackson doesnt deserve to be dropped, but if he starts turning in performances like last season and beyond will someone from the leadership group ever be dropped? Will our ex captain be dropped if he continues to have little impact?

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #963 on: April 11, 2013, 10:59:04 AM »
I fear Jackson. King. Newman. Grigg. McGaune. Houli. Will get preferential treatment.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100482
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Richmond midfielder Nathan Foley set to return in VFL (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #964 on: April 11, 2013, 04:37:13 PM »
Richmond midfielder Nathan Foley set to return in VFL

    From: AAP
    April 11, 2013 2:36PM

RICHMOND midfielder Nathan Foley is on the verge of returning to the VFL, further boosting the Tigers' playing depth.

Foley hasn't played played since the middle of last season because of an Achilles tendon injury.

"Nathan will play his first game, barring any setback, next week - which is very exciting," coach Damien Hardwick said.

"He's flying at the moment."

Tigers defender David Astbury will also resume in the VFL after recovering from a foot injury.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/afl/teams/richmond-midfielder-nathan-foley-set-to-return-in-vfl/story-e6frf9mx-1226618292352

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100482
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #965 on: April 12, 2013, 03:05:22 AM »
When Foley is playing and in the centre square at the centre bounces, we win the centre clearance 15.7% more of the time.

http://www.afl.com.au/staticfile/AFL%20Tenant/AFL/Files/Images/Clearances.jpg

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #966 on: April 12, 2013, 07:25:52 AM »
When Foley is playing and in the centre square at the centre bounces, we win the centre clearance 15.7% more of the time.

http://www.afl.com.au/staticfile/AFL%20Tenant/AFL/Files/Images/Clearances.jpg

But we can't squeeze him in

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #967 on: April 12, 2013, 08:07:50 AM »
When Foley is playing and in the centre square at the centre bounces, we win the centre clearance 15.7% more of the time.

http://www.afl.com.au/staticfile/AFL%20Tenant/AFL/Files/Images/Clearances.jpg

But we can't squeeze him in

We will when he's ready.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #968 on: April 12, 2013, 08:13:13 AM »
When Foley is playing and in the centre square at the centre bounces, we win the centre clearance 15.7% more of the time.

http://www.afl.com.au/staticfile/AFL%20Tenant/AFL/Files/Images/Clearances.jpg

But we can't squeeze him in

Foley would be in my best 22.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #969 on: April 12, 2013, 11:33:36 AM »
He will be a great inclusion. Can't wait for the day!!
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #970 on: April 12, 2013, 05:41:28 PM »
When fit and firing nathan is easily in my top ten picked

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #971 on: April 12, 2013, 06:03:15 PM »
When fit and firing nathan is easily in my top ten picked
Agreed!
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #972 on: April 12, 2013, 06:54:13 PM »
When Foley is playing and in the centre square at the centre bounces, we win the centre clearance 15.7% more of the time.

http://www.afl.com.au/staticfile/AFL%20Tenant/AFL/Files/Images/Clearances.jpg

But we can't squeeze him in



Foley would be in my best 22.
Foley would be in any sides best 22 when fit
« Last Edit: April 12, 2013, 08:17:50 PM by big tone »

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #973 on: April 12, 2013, 08:00:24 PM »
Would be near ideal as a sub.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #974 on: April 12, 2013, 08:49:14 PM »
all you guys are crazy, he's not good enough to be in our best 22. Cant get on the park and cant hit a target