« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 70 71 [72] 73 74 ... 85   Go Down

Author Topic: Nathan Foley [merged]  (Read 146280 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100494
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1065 on: June 13, 2013, 06:41:24 PM »
AUDIO: Nathan Foley on SEN this morning

http://www.sen.com.au/audioplayer/Audio/Nathan-Foley-on-the-Morning-Glory/8232


* It’s a work in progress.  I probably struggled in my first few games back, but in the last couple I’ve started to find my feet a little bit. The Achilles itself feels really good.  It’s just a case of getting match fitness in and adjusting to AFL again now.

* We’ve been in the same situations at times, when we’ve put in disappointing efforts and then had that steely resolve on the track during the week to come out and make amends. Certainly Adelaide will be that case this week, so it’ll be a good challenge for us.
Logged

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100494
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1066 on: June 17, 2013, 12:18:02 PM »
 Richmond_FC twitter:

"We thought Axel was back to his old ways on the weekend..."


https://twitter.com/Richmond_FC/status/346438570820632578/photo/1
Logged

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1067 on: June 17, 2013, 05:41:28 PM »
read em and weep username
Logged

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1068 on: June 17, 2013, 05:43:01 PM »
Quote from: Gigantor on June 17, 2013, 05:41:28 PM
read em and weep username

Graph is fos

Going backwards in leaps and bounds
Logged

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1069 on: June 17, 2013, 05:47:46 PM »
yr fos  ::)
Logged

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1070 on: June 17, 2013, 05:58:45 PM »
Fos Williams????chocos dad?
Logged

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1071 on: June 30, 2013, 08:07:40 PM »
How good is this new recruit going ..... ;D
Logged
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1072 on: June 30, 2013, 09:14:28 PM »
unlike Foley the hack

Foley was crap

yep stuff Foley the colac hack off

username with foley love  :clapping
Logged

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1073 on: June 30, 2013, 09:32:03 PM »
What a game by the Folester....

YESSSSSSSSS  :clapping :clapping :clapping
Logged

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1074 on: June 30, 2013, 09:33:27 PM »
was close to bog
Logged

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1075 on: June 30, 2013, 09:34:39 PM »
Was very good today. :thumbsup
Logged

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1076 on: June 30, 2013, 09:36:59 PM »
Quote from: tony_montana on June 30, 2013, 09:33:27 PM
was close to bog

Fair call. Yep.

Quote from: Tuckerbag on June 30, 2013, 09:34:39 PM
Was very good today. :thumbsup

Was very very good
Logged

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1077 on: June 30, 2013, 09:39:50 PM »
Quote from: Dookie on June 30, 2013, 09:36:59 PM
Quote from: tony_montana on June 30, 2013, 09:33:27 PM
was close to bog

Fair call. Yep.

Quote from: Tuckerbag on June 30, 2013, 09:34:39 PM
Was very good today. :thumbsup

Was very very good

I had him in my bests. There is very good then there is excellent. :thumbsup
Logged

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1078 on: June 30, 2013, 09:41:54 PM »
tv chaplin conca edwards x2 grigg houli jackson  were all better than foley

u know where u can shove ur stats
Logged

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: Nathan Foley [merged]
« Reply #1079 on: June 30, 2013, 09:57:03 PM »
Quote from: Username: on June 30, 2013, 09:41:54 PM
tv chaplin conca edwards x2 grigg houli jackson  were all better than foley

u know where u can shove ur stats

Its evident and common sense that Foley was better than most of the above, on merit rather than pure quantitative stats.

That comes from site members with a generally open and fair view on players.

Lets here it for common sense :clapping


Logged
Pages: 1 ... 70 71 [72] 73 74 ... 85   Go Up
« previous next »