I find these types of articles funny. 'Everyone is a genius in hindsight' as the old saying goes and this is exactly the case with retrospective article. You can break down any close game and pinpoint the mistakes that cost a team the game. Ours is probably easier to put your finger on because, besides that 6-8 minute period, the contest was even. When it all comes down to it though, good teams find a way to win in tight contests while young teams often find a way to lose. Consistency and sustained concentration is the elusive goal every developing team is working towards.
No real earth shattering revelations here really.