Author Topic: Sack Hardwick [merged]  (Read 331542 times)

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1755 on: September 07, 2014, 06:57:42 PM »
Get Mick Malthouse

James Frawley - Captain Coach.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1756 on: September 07, 2014, 06:58:44 PM »
Disgrace!

Can't tackle, can't run, horrible forward line structure!

Worst fwd line structures.

Dimmer is limited in the art of adaptability
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1757 on: September 07, 2014, 07:10:54 PM »
Get Brett Ratten

Offline Muscles

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 843
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1758 on: September 07, 2014, 07:40:03 PM »
I think Voss said it three time in a row on Fox after the game.  He said that Richmond players just don't work or run hard enough when they don't have the ball.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40322
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1759 on: September 07, 2014, 07:43:31 PM »
I think Voss said it three time in a row on Fox after the game.  He said that Richmond players just don't work or run hard enough when they don't have the ball.

BINGO!
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Simonator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2888
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1760 on: September 07, 2014, 07:47:10 PM »
That was blindingly obvious. It's having a coach/captain that sets the standards of how they run that matters.

Offline kingkingston

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • For We're From Tigerland
    • aussiesportsforum
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1761 on: September 07, 2014, 08:59:22 PM »
must win a final next season to save his job you would think

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1762 on: September 07, 2014, 10:08:25 PM »
I think Voss said it three time in a row on Fox after the game.  He said that Richmond players just don't work or run hard enough when they don't have the ball.

We need Voss, get it done Tiges

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1763 on: September 08, 2014, 07:48:39 AM »
Voss pls

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1764 on: September 08, 2014, 10:40:01 AM »
For me i think the players lost it. They were always a couple of steps behind. In the few times we did have the ball there was no spread and it put the ball carrier under a lot of pressure. 2 way running was non existent as well.

I don't know if it's because the players got complacent or if they're just burnt out from the late season charge but they looked like they were running on the spot all day.

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1765 on: September 08, 2014, 10:51:36 AM »
The Port players backed each other to win the 50/50 contests and sprinted forward to receive the ball. If we had of won the 50/50 contests early we would have scored quickly ourselves and made them more accountable. The game was literally lost in the first 5 minutes of the game when we couldn't absorb the pressure and win the ball.

The only bad decision I felt we made strategically at a coaches level was allowing Port to have the extra man in defense. This created the sling shot football which we were always going to lose when they were confident and ahead on the score board. Cotchins decision to kick against the wind really was a bad one in retrospect.

Ultimately Port were just far to good - their pressure and run killed us  :help

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1766 on: September 08, 2014, 12:00:58 PM »
It astounds me that there extra man if defence was able to have an impact but ours was non existent. Even when we did somewhat slow them down and hold up their "slingshot" play they were still able to find an open man inside F50

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1767 on: September 08, 2014, 12:11:31 PM »
Last time we played, we just manned the loose up and beat them easy.

Wouldn't have mattered because we were arse yesterday but still would have been nice to have tried it anyway.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1768 on: September 08, 2014, 12:18:00 PM »
Port were stuffn awesome!
Caracella and Balmey.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1769 on: September 08, 2014, 01:42:43 PM »
Last time we played, we just manned the loose up and beat them easy.

Wouldn't have mattered because we were arse yesterday but still would have been nice to have tried it anyway.

yep

I mentioned in another thread - that our best wouldn't have been good enough anyway, Port were incredible, but yeah would've been nice to try it