Author Topic: Sack Hardwick [merged]  (Read 315483 times)

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #705 on: April 05, 2014, 05:15:57 PM »
Bomber wont say no a second time

Agree with this but how we gonna fund Hardwick getting the arse. A sponsor needs to come forward and payhim out and then we have to wait to see Essendon bring their love child back and tell bomber that he no longer has a job.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #706 on: April 05, 2014, 05:19:07 PM »
Bomber wont say no a second time

Agree with this but how we gonna fund Hardwick getting the arse. A sponsor needs to come forward and payhim out and then we have to wait to see Essendon bring their love child back and tell bomber that he no longer has a job.

Bomber can walk anytime he wants, I bet he put that is his temp contract too.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #707 on: April 05, 2014, 05:22:15 PM »
Bomber wont say no a second time


Agree with this but how we gonna fund Hardwick getting the arse. A sponsor needs to come forward and payhim out and then we have to wait to see Essendon bring their love child back and tell bomber that he no longer has a job.

FTF  :shh

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #708 on: April 05, 2014, 05:27:18 PM »
Let Choco coach for a Few matches, Damian.

He once coached a team to a premiership, u know?



Caracella and Balmey.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #709 on: April 05, 2014, 05:28:43 PM »
Let Choco coach for a Few matches, Damian.

He once coached a team to a premiership, u know?

Nah cant have him in the box, under utilise him on the bench geeing young blokes up

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #710 on: April 05, 2014, 06:05:13 PM »
He really needs to swing the axe next week, if he doesn't he will be doing what Wallace did and hanging onto the players that he thinks will come good, at his peril.

He needs to make some bold changes and stick with the players he brings in, the Arnott's, Lloyds, Elton's and a few others.

The Newman's, Edwards, Big O's, Grigg's and the like need to go, maybe not so much Grigg but the rest are finished.

We need the X factor players that want to have a crack, look at Gordon today, really went for it and won!!

Selection policy is concerning

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #711 on: April 05, 2014, 06:07:32 PM »
Edwards?

Did you see the game WAT? Or just hanging your old mate because we lost?

Jackstar is back!!!

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #712 on: April 05, 2014, 06:07:44 PM »
Can't swing the axe if you haven't got one
All Bark no Bite is our Dimma

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #713 on: April 05, 2014, 06:08:56 PM »
Can't swing the axe if you haven't got one
All Bark no Bite is our Dimma

Who are comma favourite boys?

Houli
Grigg
Petard
Foley?
Thomas?
Jackson?

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13274
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #714 on: April 05, 2014, 06:20:49 PM »
Get rid of Big O LMAO, he is only in because our first two options are down

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19136
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #715 on: April 05, 2014, 06:23:46 PM »
Get rid of Big O LMAO, he is only in because our first two options are down

Stephenson =/= Hamspud.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #716 on: April 05, 2014, 06:27:28 PM »
Minson 55 hitouts lol

Would have been better off going in a tall short against them.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #717 on: April 05, 2014, 06:28:34 PM »
Get rid of Big O LMAO, he is only in because our first two options are down

Stephenson > Hamspud.

Stephenson certainly wasn't our worst today.  Won his fair share of hitouts and even got involved a bit around the ground but our mids were bloody woeful for a fair bit of the game and couldn't get a decent clearance in the first half to save their lives.  Even Griff was getting plenty of tapouts but they slaughtered us around the ball-ups for much of the game.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13274
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #718 on: April 05, 2014, 06:30:21 PM »
Get rid of Big O LMAO, he is only in because our first two options are down

Stephenson > Hamspud.

Stephenson certainly wasn't our worst today.  Won his fair share of hitouts and even got involved a bit around the ground but our mids were bloody woeful for a fair bit of the game and couldn't get a decent clearance in the first half to save their lives.  Even Griff was getting plenty of tapouts but they slaughtered us around the ball-ups for much of the game.

Apart from Cotch we suck at clearances

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19136
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #719 on: April 05, 2014, 06:32:32 PM »
Get rid of Big O LMAO, he is only in because our first two options are down

Stephenson > Hamspud.

Stephenson certainly wasn't our worst today.  Won his fair share of hitouts and even got involved a bit around the ground but our mids were bloody woeful for a fair bit of the game and couldn't get a decent clearance in the first half to save their lives.  Even Griff was getting plenty of tapouts but they slaughtered us around the ball-ups for much of the game.

Adjusted my post but I agree. At least he offers some kind of presence around the ground.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.