Author Topic: Sack Hardwick [merged]  (Read 331258 times)

Offline Lozza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2940 on: April 30, 2016, 09:48:10 PM »
Hardwick on the phone with 8 minutes to go and 33pts down, who the hell is he talking to.

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2941 on: April 30, 2016, 09:48:55 PM »
Get Hardwick on the phone now & tell him Mick Malthouse has applied for his job. Have Him,  :snidegrin Chocco & all the assistants clean there lockers out.

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2942 on: April 30, 2016, 09:58:07 PM »
Get Hardwick on the phone now & tell him Mick Malthouse has applied for his job. Have Him,  :snidegrin Chocco & all the assistants clean there lockers out.

I'd actually have Mick just to clean the joint out and build it up again, like Roos at Melbourne but less ego.

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2943 on: April 30, 2016, 09:59:16 PM »
Hardwick on the phone with 8 minutes to go and 33pts down, who the hell is he talking to.

Obviously the bench. Pretending to make a move or something
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Online Knighter

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2744
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2944 on: April 30, 2016, 10:16:28 PM »
Hardwick on the phone with 8 minutes to go and 33pts down, who the hell is he talking to.

Just ordering a pizza for the trip,home

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2945 on: April 30, 2016, 10:18:22 PM »
Nicely disguised loss, won't get 1st draft pick by winning games  :clapping

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2946 on: April 30, 2016, 10:25:10 PM »
Hardwick is not just the problem. Clubs lack of ambition is. We have been stooged. Again.

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2947 on: April 30, 2016, 10:27:43 PM »
Sack Hardwick but retain Jackson Hartley and the monkeyball approach will end up just like this tenure.

Ultimately it's all his doing. The list the decision not to target certain players.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Online Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2948 on: April 30, 2016, 10:36:33 PM »
Sack Hardwick but retain Jackson Hartley and the monkeyball approach will end up just like this tenure.

Ultimately it's all his doing. The list the decision not to target certain players.
Sack the whole footy department. Start again!




..........................................AGAIN!
The club that keeps giving.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2949 on: April 30, 2016, 10:41:40 PM »
We have been deceived.

That isn't acceptable.

Heads must roll.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Lozza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2950 on: April 30, 2016, 11:03:17 PM »
Hardwicks presser much the same as every other loss.We arent executing and we need to go back to basics.If the players cant hit a target by hand or foot then sorry they are not of AFL standard, unfortunately in our current 22 we have alot of those players. Just turnovers alone are costing us at least 8-9 goals a game, too much to overcome week in week out in a very even competition. We have the wrong list for todays game and the club wont admit it, alot of pain coming for supporters before they finally do.

Offline Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4499
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2951 on: April 30, 2016, 11:13:12 PM »

I'd actually have Mick just to clean the joint out and build it up again, like Roos at Melbourne but less ego.

LOL

Malthouse has the biggest ego in footy

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2952 on: April 30, 2016, 11:14:26 PM »
He still believes that they are winning the possession count. Let me tell you something Hardwick. The only possession count you are winning & winning in great numbers are your own possessions. That is why your count is so high. You ain't doing any damage to any team. Your whole team causes its own destruction. Over use of the ball uses more energy & the more you run & carry the less energy you have to run out the game or have the ability to stick hard tackles cause the opposition will just brush your weak arms off. You kill yourselves. The opposition don't out run you. They gang up to where you are going. 3 d x 1f. l would have corrected that in the 1st quarter. always run & carry the ball from the kick-ins the same method every time. Opposition knows where to plant there bigs & the crumbers. l laughed when they went down the guts, just lucky they never got that goal. How predictable that we cover the pockets & flanks. 3 kicks to the other end. Why don't we do that more often. Game plan stinks. If you can't see that & Chocco & others can't see that. Walk out the door the lot of you cause that is the problem your looking for. TOO MUCH RUNNING & NOT ENOUGH KICKING Its a kicking game so kick the bloody ball long & direct & use the 200cm forwards. Teach them Maggots how to kick the football from outside 50 metres. Let them use thier own football brains.  :banghead

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2953 on: April 30, 2016, 11:18:50 PM »
Mr stats man strikes again with his words of wisdom  :clapping

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8099
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #2954 on: April 30, 2016, 11:20:49 PM »
We have been deceived.

That isn't acceptable.

Heads must roll.

And yet heads won't roll. This we know.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.