Author Topic: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]  (Read 292095 times)

Offline rogerd3

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #450 on: September 14, 2012, 12:13:14 PM »
Reece happy at tigerland wont be going anywhere. :thumbsup

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #451 on: September 14, 2012, 12:14:29 PM »
Reece happy at tigerland wont be going anywhere. :thumbsup

Yesssssssssss.......Great News Rog :clapping :clapping

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #452 on: September 14, 2012, 03:17:58 PM »
Conca rumours have been killed by RFC_O on bigfooty.
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #453 on: September 14, 2012, 06:37:09 PM »
Conca rumours have been killed by RFC_O on bigfooty.

Like a fortnight ago ::)
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #454 on: September 14, 2012, 07:37:02 PM »
Conca rumours have been killed by RFC_O on bigfooty.

Like a fortnight ago ::)

Big boy
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #455 on: September 14, 2012, 07:46:15 PM »
can someone explain this to me

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/147651/default.aspx

what happens if neither GC or GWS use their first pick on Viney. Can we bid on him??

How does it work that Melbourne may get him for mid 20 pick? Gee that was royally pee me off hopefully one of those 2 have the smarts to stuff Melbourne up
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #456 on: September 14, 2012, 07:51:37 PM »
can someone explain this to me

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/147651/default.aspx

what happens if neither GC or GWS use their first pick on Viney. Can we bid on him??

How does it work that Melbourne may get him for mid 20 pick? Gee that was royally pee me off hopefully one of those 2 have the smarts to stuff Melbourne up

We can bid Dan. I'm guessing he will go with either of the Dees first rounders
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #457 on: September 14, 2012, 08:01:11 PM »
can someone explain this to me

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/147651/default.aspx

what happens if neither GC or GWS use their first pick on Viney. Can we bid on him??

How does it work that Melbourne may get him for mid 20 pick? Gee that was royally pee me off hopefully one of those 2 have the smarts to stuff Melbourne up

We can bid but they get to take him with their next pick which will be mid 20's. I was saying these pricks were tanking from early on in the season to use the scully compo picks and get viney for stuff all in a strong draft. They are a disgrace to football and the afl is a bigger disgrace for not cottoning onto this fact.

GWS and GC if they bid on him that forces Melbourne to use their next pick on him which is 3, but I doubt either of those sides will nominate him, he's probably a realistic top 5 pick, prob not a top 2-3 pick.

The oly solace I take is they are a pathetic rabble of a footy club that will never utilize the fruits of their "labour" due to sheer incompetence and it looks as though the very fabric of the club is falling apart with players wanting out badly

Offline RedanTiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #458 on: September 14, 2012, 08:03:47 PM »
Apparently Jon Giles is not with his current contract offer.

He is a ruckman who i rate and at 24 is the perfect age.

Looks like he wants back to adelaide, but i agree, id be going hard to try and get him. Maric and Giles would be a formidable ruck duo and both arent mugs when it comes to kicking a goal or 2

Very unlikely to be traded to Richmond.
After overlooking him to take Derickx two years ago, it is unlikely people at Richmond (or any other club for that matter) would so clearly admit their error.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #459 on: September 15, 2012, 08:22:33 AM »
can someone explain this to me

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/147651/default.aspx

what happens if neither GC or GWS use their first pick on Viney. Can we bid on him??

How does it work that Melbourne may get him for mid 20 pick? Gee that was royally pee me off hopefully one of those 2 have the smarts to stuff Melbourne up

We can bid but they get to take him with their next pick which will be mid 20's. I was saying these pricks were tanking from early on in the season to use the scully compo picks and get viney for stuff all in a strong draft. They are a disgrace to football and the afl is a bigger disgrace for not cottoning onto this fact.

GWS and GC if they bid on him that forces Melbourne to use their next pick on him which is 3, but I doubt either of those sides will nominate him, he's probably a realistic top 5 pick, prob not a top 2-3 pick.

The oly solace I take is they are a pathetic rabble of a footy club that will never utilize the fruits of their "labour" due to sheer incompetence and it looks as though the very fabric of the club is falling apart with players wanting out badly

Why wouldn't GC or GWS just bid on him

Isn't it better they force the dees to use pick 3 on viney and not a guy they want

I will spew if they got viney at their sub 20 pick and a gun at 3.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #460 on: September 15, 2012, 08:45:28 AM »
Would you bid on a house to push the price up when it is declared on the market?
If they don't want him, they shouldn't and wouldn't bid.
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #461 on: September 15, 2012, 10:49:38 AM »
what if they would actually take him if they can?
Melbourne have declared their hand, they will take him regardless of the pick they use. So why would you sit back at let that be a late pick, thus risking having a player you want, to be taken before your first pick?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #462 on: September 15, 2012, 11:00:28 AM »
GC will bid and it will be because they want him. He's the type they need.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #463 on: September 15, 2012, 11:10:55 AM »
what if they would actually take him if they can?
Melbourne have declared their hand, they will take him regardless of the pick they use. So why would you sit back at let that be a late pick, thus risking having a player you want, to be taken before your first pick?

Melbourne have come out and said they will take best available, so if GC bid to take him with their pick 2, melbourne will let him go as they feel there are a couple better prospects available at that very top end. The only hope is that GC will bid on him(and happily take him at pick 2) if the dees dont match it, as Viney fills a need for GC (inside mid), GWS will not risk taking him with pick 1 as there is better available.

sorry tigs2011 didnt read your post before replying, you are correct about the GC, lets hope they keep dees honest and dont allow them to rape this draft

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #464 on: September 15, 2012, 11:14:27 AM »
Nah, Melbourne have signed a contract him. They also got got special permission for him to play with casey (and i think he may have played NAB cup?) They have committed to taking him regardless, or I doubt the AFL would have granted that.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI