Author Topic: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]  (Read 291316 times)

Offline rogerd3

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #585 on: September 20, 2012, 08:51:18 PM »
SEN reporting that Moloney has nominated Essendon as his club of choice.

Good.. He's old and won't do anything there. He's an Essendon type of midfielder.
dont know what his age has to do with it. only question we need ask is can he play will he be an upgrade on any player we have cut.
 the answer to those questions is an emphatic yes.
tough experienced inside mid he would have filled foleys shoes pretty well this yr.
we moan about the lack of midfield depth but then moan about players being too old who would cost nothing but their salary. players who are massive upgrades in the short term on what we have.

fair dinkum we could do  6 or 7 mature players and 5 or 6  kids this yr.

i would not hesitate to take moloney chaplin knights as free agents.
i would also be looking to take late nd and rookie picks players  from state leagues like
kyle hartigan 23yo kpd
james boyd 23yo rover
kyle martin 22yo mid
michael sikora 23yo ruckman
sam dwyer  23 24 yo mid
and there are plenty others who would be mbetter options than those we have cut and some who remain on our list.

forget about his age tell me one midfield player who is up for grabs who is better than moloney. who cares if we only get 3 yrs out of him it would be three yrs of better footy than we would get out of lots of others.

well we dont know who is available apart from the bloke that likes peeing in ashtrays
looks like you can be nominated as the maxi bus driver to pick up all these blokes
that you want.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98238
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #586 on: September 21, 2012, 12:04:04 AM »
Barrett said tonight on the footy show that North will be showing Caddy around Arden Street. Of course it's hard to take him seriously with anything to do with North as he's a North supporter and he's sitting right across from Brayshaw as he's saying it.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98238
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #587 on: September 21, 2012, 12:46:57 AM »
Collingwood has shown interest in out of contract Giant ruckman Jonathan Giles.

St Kilda is a serious chance to snare young Gold Coast ruckman Tom Hickey, who is considering a move to Melbourne for personal reasons despite his Queensland origins. They are understood to have offered Hickey a three-year contract.

The Saints also met with homecoming midfielder Josh Caddy, who is returning to Victoria after two years with the Suns and is meeting with a number of Victorian clubs. Caddy has had shoulder surgery and is on the radar of most Victorian clubs. Carlton, Collingwood, Essendon, Geelong, St Kilda and North Melbourne have all registered an interest.

The Demons are pursuing out- of-contract Collingwood wingman Sharrod Wellingham, who was coached by Mark Neeld when the Melbourne coach was coaching the Collingwood midfield.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/magpies-consider-young-giant-for-ruck-role-20120920-269kc.html




Offline H Tiger

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 486
  • Tigers the biggest hunter
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #588 on: September 21, 2012, 02:10:42 AM »
Thought this was interesting.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/148102/default.aspx

Thought he looked good in the game against us and in his debut.

Blues will probably have some Visy money they can find him. But they would have to promote him wouldn't they?

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98238
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #589 on: September 21, 2012, 03:44:12 AM »
Fremantle have offered Brendon Goddard a guaranteed four-year contract worth $3.4m. The tempting $850,000-a-year deal is way and above the Saints' best offer so far of about $640,000 a year for three years.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/afl/fremantle-stun-rivals-by-offering-free-agent-brendon-goddard-big-four-year-contract/story-fnca0u4y-1226478444415

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #590 on: September 21, 2012, 05:08:38 AM »
Snip keep the crude and personal sniping off the forum

WP-Question, why did you remove 95% of my posts but leave theirs, including the post where they called me a twit which as we all know is actually the big "C" word, which you have said constitutes a ban?????

Double standards again....do me a favour, delete all the crap comments but be fair!!!
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #591 on: September 21, 2012, 05:25:55 AM »
Snip keep the crude and personal sniping off the forum

WP-Question, why did you remove 95% of my posts but leave theirs, including the post where they called me a twit which as we all know is actually the big "C" word, which you have said constitutes a ban?????

Double standards again....do me a favour, delete all the crap comments but be fair!!!
WAT, I can see your point but wouldn't this be better off posted as a PM?

Question on thread topic, why wouldn't we be going after Giles or a back up ruck?
We are screwed if Eeeevan goes down with injury - its made a huge difference to the quantity and quality of our clearence work.
Why why why?
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #592 on: September 21, 2012, 05:37:04 AM »
Snip keep the crude and personal sniping off the forum

WP-Question, why did you remove 95% of my posts but leave theirs, including the post where they called me a twit which as we all know is actually the big "C" word, which you have said constitutes a ban?????

Double standards again....do me a favour, delete all the crap comments but be fair!!!
WAT, I can see your point but wouldn't this be better off posted as a PM?

Because the double standards on this forum are becoming more prevelant to me, so this is how I will address my issue, see your point, sorry if I have offended you. :thumbsup

Agree with you on the ruck comment, we need two rucks, Maric is great, lets hope Vicks can stand up.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #593 on: September 21, 2012, 05:46:46 AM »
Double standards on this forum lol.... Never hahahaha  :sant :banghead :banghead :banghead

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #594 on: September 21, 2012, 07:11:59 AM »
The prospect of Giles up forward for the pies is quite a dangerous proposition, being able to replace dawes he take take big marks and kick goals. More importantly Jolly could get a good rest up forward as Giles is no slouch in the ruck.

We should try and get him, imagine the relief for Ivan and still having vickery as an option too? Dangerous fws line ruck combo

Get it done tiges!
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40311
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #595 on: September 21, 2012, 07:42:35 AM »
WP-Question, why did you remove 95% of my posts but leave theirs, including the post where they called me a twit which as we all know is actually the big "C" word, which you have said constitutes a ban?????

Double standards again....do me a favour, delete all the crap comments but be fair!!!

WAT: Firstly this complaint of yours should have been sent via PM out of respect to others on the forum. But in this case I'll answer

The word twit has multiple meanings one of which is "a foolish or despicable person" which I think the majority would think is how the word was used in this instance also I think the  ;D at the end of the post mean it was done in jest perhaps like some of your responses that appear with  :lol :lol or  ;) ;) ;) at the end.

So I believe to suggest it was being used as a way to avoid the "C" word is drawing a long bow to be honest.

As for your argument regarding double standards on the forum .... at what point do they kick in? When you use this icon  :wallywink to describe other posters who don't agree with you? Or when you border on abusing them in your posts? ... Perhaps it' better if I let that argument go through to the keeper. PM me if you want to discuss that further

And BTW I have said this before if you and others want all the "crap" removed or edited then you better be careful of what you wish for because I doubt very much people would like it too much. 
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #596 on: September 21, 2012, 07:47:16 AM »
I for one enjoy the crap!  It ads character!
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #597 on: September 21, 2012, 08:09:04 AM »
WP-Question, why did you remove 95% of my posts but leave theirs, including the post where they called me a twit which as we all know is actually the big "C" word, which you have said constitutes a ban?????

Double standards again....do me a favour, delete all the crap comments but be fair!!!

WAT: Firstly this complaint of yours should have been sent via PM out of respect to others on the forum. But in this case I'll answer

The word twit has multiple meanings one of which is "a foolish or despicable person" which I think the majority would think is how the word was used in this instance also I think the  ;D at the end of the post mean it was done in jest perhaps like some of your responses that appear with  :lol :lol or  ;) ;) ;) at the end.

So I believe to suggest it was being used as a way to avoid the "C" word is drawing a long bow to be honest.

As for your argument regarding double standards on the forum .... at what point do they kick in? When you use this icon  :wallywink to describe other posters who don't agree with you? Or when you border on abusing them in your posts? ... Perhaps it' better if I let that argument go through to the keeper. PM me if you want to discuss that further

And BTW I have said this before if you and others want all the "crap" removed or edited then you better be careful of what you wish for because I doubt very much people would like it too much.

Don't be so naive to think anything other then what was intended by that word..you have been around long enough.

No point really answering the rest, your comments are just another example of your protection for your forum buddies. You point out my flaws and my comments without mentioning others..I don't appreciate being called "stupid" or "an idiot" so yes I will call people the same or worse...and all the  ;D :lol :rollin :rollin :thumbsup ::) :whistle :whistle.....look around the forum....everyone stuffing does it!!!! Have a good day.

BTW you usully answer the same in a PM so whats the bloody point.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline tiga

  • Exhaling Carbon in the
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Yes Hampson has taken a mark!
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #598 on: September 21, 2012, 08:51:24 AM »
WP-Question, why did you remove 95% of my posts but leave theirs, including the post where they called me a twit which as we all know is actually the big "C" word, which you have said constitutes a ban?????

Double standards again....do me a favour, delete all the crap comments but be fair!!!

WAT: Firstly this complaint of yours should have been sent via PM out of respect to others on the forum. But in this case I'll answer

The word twit has multiple meanings one of which is "a foolish or despicable person" which I think the majority would think is how the word was used in this instance also I think the  ;D at the end of the post mean it was done in jest perhaps like some of your responses that appear with  :lol :lol or  ;) ;) ;) at the end.

So I believe to suggest it was being used as a way to avoid the "C" word is drawing a long bow to be honest.

As for your argument regarding double standards on the forum .... at what point do they kick in? When you use this icon  :wallywink to describe other posters who don't agree with you? Or when you border on abusing them in your posts? ... Perhaps it' better if I let that argument go through to the keeper. PM me if you want to discuss that further

And BTW I have said this before if you and others want all the "crap" removed or edited then you better be careful of what you wish for because I doubt very much people would like it too much.

Don't be so naive to think anything other then what was intended by that word..you have been around long enough.

No point really answering the rest, your comments are just another example of your protection for your forum buddies. You point out my flaws and my comments without mentioning others..I don't appreciate being called "stupid" or "an idiot" so yes I will call people the same or worse...and all the  ;D :lol :rollin :rollin :thumbsup ::) :whistle :whistle.....look around the forum....everyone stuffing does it!!!! Have a good day.

BTW you usully answer the same in a PM so whats the bloody point.

Rebuttal??

Firstly, I can't believe what I am seeing. You need to grow up WAT and move on. I certainly did after a big chunk of my posts also got removed along with your references to me as having an incestuous relationship with TFT. When I used the acronym twit, it was prefaced as an acronym attached with a loose interpretation of what WP described. Never was the "C" word ever associated with my reply and for you to think so is scurrilous. Good Sir, you are nothing but a Cad and a Bounder.

If it pleases the court, I wish to propose the penalty of either a keelhauling or 50 lashes with a cat o' 9 tails for WAT's skulduggery and obvious grandstanding.  ;D

(Sorry I'm reading "Batavia" by Peter Fitzsimons at them moment which is a ripping read and it appears I'm a little too immersed judging by my recent commentary  ;D)

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Trade week targets & rumours [merged]
« Reply #599 on: September 21, 2012, 09:21:08 AM »
WP-Question, why did you remove 95% of my posts but leave theirs, including the post where they called me a twit which as we all know is actually the big "C" word, which you have said constitutes a ban?????

Double standards again....do me a favour, delete all the crap comments but be fair!!!

WAT: Firstly this complaint of yours should have been sent via PM out of respect to others on the forum. But in this case I'll answer

The word twit has multiple meanings one of which is "a foolish or despicable person" which I think the majority would think is how the word was used in this instance also I think the  ;D at the end of the post mean it was done in jest perhaps like some of your responses that appear with  :lol :lol or  ;) ;) ;) at the end.

So I believe to suggest it was being used as a way to avoid the "C" word is drawing a long bow to be honest.

As for your argument regarding double standards on the forum .... at what point do they kick in? When you use this icon  :wallywink to describe other posters who don't agree with you? Or when you border on abusing them in your posts? ... Perhaps it' better if I let that argument go through to the keeper. PM me if you want to discuss that further

And BTW I have said this before if you and others want all the "crap" removed or edited then you better be careful of what you wish for because I doubt very much people would like it too much.

Don't be so naive to think anything other then what was intended by that word..you have been around long enough.

No point really answering the rest, your comments are just another example of your protection for your forum buddies. You point out my flaws and my comments without mentioning others..I don't appreciate being called "stupid" or "an idiot" so yes I will call people the same or worse...and all the  ;D :lol :rollin :rollin :thumbsup ::) :whistle :whistle.....look around the forum....everyone stuffing does it!!!! Have a good day.

BTW you usully answer the same in a PM so whats the bloody point.

 :lol :lol :lol Now this is the funniest thing I have read all year :lol looks have a look at some of your responses if Tiga or I had of posted the above ;D

Go read my post again, I have not mentioned this blokes name once, I generalised saying I didn't want to give up pick 9 for top up players, I did not infer this guy is a top up player, it was a different comment. FFS get up earlier... :banghead


Ok, I DID NOT NAME HIM AS A TOP UP PLAYER.......IS THAT CLEAR?????? I was generalising.

I said I wouldn't trade away pick 9 thats it, clear cut, nothing to read into. Enough said, IMO we keep pick 9...pretty easy to understand..

Well where the hell did I even mention that Cotch's season would be a failure, just a stupid comment. So don't act all...WTF!

Where did I say I delight in it...twisting my words yet again ......clown.

Oh bla bla bla, don't reply to my posts if you don't like name calling, fool.
You are so contradictory, freedom of speech unless it's me or my comments about Edwards.

No double standards, did you read my post?????

WAT the King of  "You have taken me out of Context" :lol :lol