Author Topic: What's our best 22 now?  (Read 117290 times)

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4341
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #330 on: March 01, 2015, 09:54:01 PM »
so after our first pre season game and going by what has been said by hardwick we can be pretty sure that the following side will go very close to being the team for rnd1.
by the sound of things most of the younger blokes have had their hit out now its time for the favorites.

fb:  hunt - astbury - chaplin
hb: houli - rance - vlastuin.

mid: ellis - martin - grigg
foll: maric - cotchin - miles

hf: knights - vickery- deledio
ff: morris - riewoldt - griffiths

int: newman - conca - petterd - foley.
emg: one of lambert, thomas, arnot.

if morris plays fwd then hunt will play back. im not keen on this i think hunt poor by foot and decision making. reckon knights will come in also at the expense of lennon.

Jackstar is back!!!

  • Guest
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #331 on: March 01, 2015, 09:58:10 PM »
Think Gordon plays before Knights

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 41250
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #332 on: March 01, 2015, 10:07:27 PM »
Think Gordon plays before Knights

Don't think either will play round 1 TBH

Gordon was average at best yesterday, thought he was very disappointing

Knights needs game time after missing 18 months of footy

Based on yesterday Lambert has to play
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4341
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #333 on: March 01, 2015, 10:10:33 PM »
Think Gordon plays before Knights
na too big a dud. knights didnt have a big game his first in almost  18mths but the poise and polish was there for all to see. imo hes a monty if he gets thru the pre season unscathed.

any way its not what i would do its what im pretty sure the club will do.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #334 on: March 01, 2015, 10:30:46 PM »
I'd like to see a couple more games before predicting this.

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #335 on: March 01, 2015, 10:43:17 PM »
Knights has class. That play in the last keeping the ball in front of him from way out not panicking and kicking the ball to Gordon who goaled was what we miss generally from our small forwards.

Class, poise and situational awareness both for the current play and the game in general.

If he is fit IMHO he should build on those four games in two seasons.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4341
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #336 on: March 02, 2015, 06:05:20 PM »
I'd like to see a couple more games before predicting this.
why to watch the kids who may push there way in. it isnt going to happen read hardwicks presser. hes basically written of the juniors.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13333
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #337 on: March 02, 2015, 09:39:38 PM »
 :nopity

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #338 on: March 02, 2015, 10:47:21 PM »
I'd like to see a couple more games before predicting this.
why to watch the kids who may push there way in. it isnt going to happen read hardwicks presser. hes basically written of the juniors.
he's probably read you posts and come to the conclusion that we drafted the wrong kids so why bother persisting with them?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline pmac21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4955
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #339 on: March 03, 2015, 10:31:41 AM »
B    Lennon       Rance        Grimes
HB  Houli          Chaplin     Batchelor
C    Conca          Miles        Vlastuin
HF  Martin        Griffiths       Deledio
F    Edwards    Reiwoldt      Morris   
R    Maric          Cotchin        Ellis
Int  Hunt
       Foley
       Newman
       Grigg (sub)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100503
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #340 on: March 03, 2015, 02:47:36 PM »
Hardwick: “The majority of the players we played [against the Dogs] probably won’t be participating early in the season ...”

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2015-03-03/top-tigers-ease-into-it

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #341 on: March 03, 2015, 02:51:16 PM »
 :phew

thats a relief !!!
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Fluffy Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2451
  • Yes I was realy born in Richmond
    • Canning A.R.T.S.
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #342 on: March 03, 2015, 04:19:51 PM »
B    Lennon       Rance        Grimes
HB  Houli          Chaplin     Batchelor
C    Conca          Miles        Vlastuin
HF  Martin        Griffiths       Deledio
F    Edwards    Reiwoldt      Morris   
R    Maric          Cotchin        Ellis
Int  Hunt
       Foley
       Newman
       Grigg (sub)

Probably close though I hope for a couple of changes.  I would definitively have Asbury in before Batchelor and I hope we can find a couple to replace Grigg and Newman. Not sure Lennon will get in yet, though l do hope the next few preseason games he shows a bit more and makes it into the team.
Here , kitty kitty. Here , kitty kitty.   AAAUGH!

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 59486
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #343 on: March 15, 2015, 07:00:36 AM »
My current 'best' 22 after NAB 2:

B:   Grimes      Chaplin      Batchelor         
HB:  Houli         Rance       Vlastuin
C:    Ellis          Martin        Hunt
HF: Deledio      Vickery      Lennon
F:   Edwards    Riewoldt     Morris
R:  Maric     Miles     Cotchin
Int: Grigg, Conca, Petterd
Sub: Lloyd

Emg: Knights, McIntosh, Lambert


I didn't consider Newy, Astbury, Griffiths, Foley or C.Ellis due to injury/absence so far in preseason matches.

I have Morris in a FP because that's where Dimma wants him to apply defensive pressure. Quiet yesterday though.

All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Fluffy Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2451
  • Yes I was realy born in Richmond
    • Canning A.R.T.S.
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #344 on: March 15, 2015, 09:50:12 AM »
My current 'best' 22 after NAB 2:

B:   Grimes      Chaplin      Batchelor         
HB:  Houli         Rance       Vlastuin
C:    Ellis          Martin        Hunt
HF: Deledio      Vickery      Lennon
F:   Edwards    Riewoldt     Morris
R:  Maric     Miles     Cotchin
Int: Grigg, Conca, Petterd
Sub: Lloyd

Emg: Knights, McIntosh, Lambert


I didn't consider Newy, Astbury, Griffiths, Foley or C.Ellis due to injury/absence so far in preseason matches.

I have Morris in a FP because that's where Dimma wants him to apply defensive pressure. Quiet yesterday though.

Pretty much what I would of said after yesterday. The two big questions that have to be answered are both Griffiths and Astbury. If they come up who makes way for them as for me they are both top 22.  The obvios answers are Batch and Vickery but it realy depends on how they want to structure the side.  3 tall fowards? 4 tall backs? Might be a little top heavy. Some defentate selection headaches which is a good thing.
Here , kitty kitty. Here , kitty kitty.   AAAUGH!