Author Topic: What's our best 22 now?  (Read 117248 times)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #465 on: November 22, 2015, 09:27:23 PM »
I'm the same with sudanese players
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #466 on: November 22, 2015, 09:28:13 PM »
Good for you

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4341
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #467 on: November 22, 2015, 09:35:00 PM »
The problem is everybody is getting taller. So what was a reasonable or ideal height 10 years ago may not be ideal in 5 years time.......
And yet. Na stuff it i have said what i wanted say on it. It was  originally posted as an observation yet the nuffies yrs later still take the pee out of.
Today i have joined the Nuffies, im here  to do nothing but belittle add nothing and take the pee. Chucky where are you brother.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #468 on: November 22, 2015, 10:00:12 PM »
Tell you what, if in 10 yrs time we have several 200+cm Fwds dominating then I'll change my mind
I don't think you'll have to wait that long. Maybe just 2 to 3 and I think many will be changing their attitude. Why?

Because until the last 5 years, 200cm players were ruck men almost exclusively. So there have been precious few forwards to make the grade at that height. Now we will get a few more like Daniher and Boyd coming through things may change.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #469 on: November 22, 2015, 10:05:40 PM »
Tell you what, if in 10 yrs time we have several 200+cm Fwds dominating then I'll change my mind
I don't think you'll have to wait that long. Maybe just 2 to 3 and I think many will be changing their attitude. Why?

Because until the last 5 years, 200cm players were ruck men almost exclusively. So there have been precious few forwards to make the grade at that height. Now we will get a few more like Daniher and Boyd coming through things may change.

We shall see. Both of those guys will not be amongst the dominant key Fwds of the comp imo. Boyd doesn't have the agility and Daniher will lose his when he puts on the weight he needs.  Give me a Hogan, Cameron type over either of those anyday

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #470 on: November 22, 2015, 10:15:15 PM »
Tell you what, if in 10 yrs time we have several 200+cm Fwds dominating then I'll change my mind
I don't think you'll have to wait that long. Maybe just 2 to 3 and I think many will be changing their attitude. Why?

Because until the last 5 years, 200cm players were ruck men almost exclusively. So there have been precious few forwards to make the grade at that height. Now we will get a few more like Daniher and Boyd coming through things may change.

We shall see. Both of those guys will not be amongst the dominant key Fwds of the comp imo. Boyd doesn't have the agility and Daniher will lose his when he puts on the weight he needs.  Give me a Hogan, Cameron type over either of those anyday
It's not 200cm per se that is the issue. Numbers are less overall so the pool of talent is much much smaller at that height. Doesn't mean that we won't find anyone though. Height is overrated either way. It works the other way too. Just because you are less than 180cm doesn't mean you won't make it. It's how well you can play. Some of the best players of all time have been less than 180cm. Sam Mitchell is under 180cm and is a star.
So if we find someone who can play the game and is over 200cm, we should grab him because he will become a dominant forward.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #471 on: November 22, 2015, 10:37:34 PM »
They are getting bigger, people
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #472 on: November 22, 2015, 10:40:34 PM »
Tell you what, if in 10 yrs time we have several 200+cm Fwds dominating then I'll change my mind
I don't think you'll have to wait that long. Maybe just 2 to 3 and I think many will be changing their attitude. Why?

Because until the last 5 years, 200cm players were ruck men almost exclusively. So there have been precious few forwards to make the grade at that height. Now we will get a few more like Daniher and Boyd coming through things may change.

We shall see. Both of those guys will not be amongst the dominant key Fwds of the comp imo. Boyd doesn't have the agility and Daniher will lose his when he puts on the weight he needs.  Give me a Hogan, Cameron type over either of those anyday
It's not 200cm per se that is the issue. Numbers are less overall so the pool of talent is much much smaller at that height. Doesn't mean that we won't find anyone though. Height is overrated either way. It works the other way too. Just because you are less than 180cm doesn't mean you won't make it. It's how well you can play. Some of the best players of all time have been less than 180cm. Sam Mitchell is under 180cm and is a star.
So if we find someone who can play the game and is over 200cm, we should grab him because he will become a dominant forward.


Well actually it is the issue... it's a smaller talent pool but not that small - off the top of my head I named a fair few above, I'm sure there a more. Vardy, Gorringe, Essendon tried Bellchambers as a stay at home fwd, kruezer...
I'm not saying they're useless, but if you are going to get the pick of the afl schoolyard for 2 key Fwds, I doubt any will come from the 200+cm list. To date, they have proven to be bit part fwd/rucks not dominant key Fwds which is what this whole discussion is about. And your right it's about how well you can play, and right now I wouldn't have a 200Cm fwd (and there are plenty of them) in the top dozen key Fwds in the comp, would you?

"He will become a dominant forward" in your opinion.... It is my opinion that he won't

Not sure why you even brought up the point of the 180cm, not  a good analogy


Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #473 on: November 22, 2015, 10:43:32 PM »
those you listed failed as rucks and were tried as forwards as a last resort, no?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #474 on: November 22, 2015, 10:44:41 PM »
No

Apart from Bellchambers and Zac Clarke

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #475 on: November 23, 2015, 09:29:10 AM »
maybe failed was the wrong wording, but they are all rucks or ruck/forwards rather than forwards
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10758
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #476 on: November 23, 2015, 10:17:55 AM »
Paul Salmon was pretty good...

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #477 on: November 23, 2015, 11:10:12 AM »
Paul Salmon was pretty good...
Also thought Ottens was a star for us up forward.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #478 on: November 23, 2015, 11:20:03 AM »
and for geelong

general patton
boyd
mcbean
hogan
hawkins
pimples

its clear as mud they are getting bigger, regardless of clawks 2 meter fetish

every position is getting larger / faster / more endurance

you have to be very good to make it as a little person

compare the size of the richmond history famous key forward and rucks to the current list
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: What's our best 22 now?
« Reply #479 on: November 23, 2015, 09:30:00 PM »
maybe failed was the wrong wording, but they are all rucks or ruck/forwards rather than forwards

Correct and they're ruck/forwards rather than Fwds for a reason - at that size they will always fill a need to be part time ruck - jack of all trades master of none.