Author Topic: Matthew McDonough [merged]  (Read 35174 times)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #270 on: June 12, 2014, 03:42:55 PM »
think wires may be crossed there
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #271 on: June 13, 2014, 12:01:26 AM »
think wires may be crossed there

Yeah possibly but took a chance, something Richmond needs to do more of

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #272 on: June 13, 2014, 12:12:30 AM »
Great development regime at punt rd under fuckwick.

Newman is the future and the way, not MCDonough
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #273 on: June 13, 2014, 08:13:49 AM »
think wires may be crossed there

Yeah possibly but took a chance, something Richmond needs to do more of
;D

So true
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #274 on: June 21, 2014, 01:15:53 PM »
I like the cut of his gib. Looks a a player. Seems like he coud compliment miles/vlastuin/dea types well

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #275 on: September 05, 2014, 01:44:23 PM »
IMO we need to re-sign this kid. I have a bad feeling that if we trade or delist him he could be one that really comes back to haunt us!!!
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #276 on: September 05, 2014, 06:51:28 PM »
IMO we need to re-sign this kid. I have a bad feeling that if we trade or delist him he could be one that really comes back to haunt us!!!

What do you base that on?
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #277 on: September 05, 2014, 06:52:53 PM »
I wanted to give him a bit more of a go, to see what he's got- but if he goes, he goes, stuff him

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #278 on: September 05, 2014, 07:05:40 PM »
IMO we need to re-sign this kid. I have a bad feeling that if we trade or delist him he could be one that really comes back to haunt us!!!

What do you base that on?

 He showed enough in the games he played. He has good pace and was near on BOG in the seconds every week. He was also named in the emergencies just about every week, very stiff not to of played more. I just think there is more of an upside to this kid.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5107
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #279 on: September 05, 2014, 11:05:47 PM »
Keep. Has beautiful skills and footy nous. Natural footballer.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58600
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #280 on: September 05, 2014, 11:19:44 PM »
McDonough has the skills and nous with the footy but he should talk to Axel about the training methods needed to add a yard of pace.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #281 on: September 06, 2014, 07:55:14 AM »
McDonough has the skills and nous with the footy but he should talk to Axel about the training methods needed to add a yard of pace.

Might be a good plan for Axel to mentor McDonuts over the next pre-season (providing they don't flick him which I hope they don't).   I'm with Willy on this, I reckon he has enough good attributes to make it but like you say MT, could do with a tad more pace.

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #282 on: September 06, 2014, 09:10:13 AM »
From what I've seen so far of McDonahue I thought he was just some exposure and experience away from being a player. Would be crazy to chop him given he can play a variety of rolls.

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #283 on: September 06, 2014, 11:24:46 AM »
I reckon he'll go back to SA. Both clubs keen
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Matthew McDonough [merged]
« Reply #284 on: September 06, 2014, 11:32:33 AM »
im not sure if this kid is good enough long term. not overly keen on him myself   but imo has shown enough to persevere with for another yr.
 like a lot of kids at all clubs  he needs a fair and reasonable  amount of time to show he belongs. in this we would be mad to just cut him.
i would have thought he was safe and the club was doing all it can to sign him on a fair contract.

my thinking is perhaps theres a bit of go home factor here hence hes not been signed.