Author Topic: Our low tackling stats  (Read 4620 times)

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #60 on: April 20, 2013, 07:34:06 PM »
4 in a q where you are chasing tail is simply unacceptable and shows a carltonesque down hill skiing type of effort.

And we all know what happens to down hill skiers.
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #61 on: April 20, 2013, 07:46:32 PM »
Yea im concerned about it, might open up for vlas :shh
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13274
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #62 on: April 20, 2013, 08:34:31 PM »
Maybe we might get some focus on a couple of the soft downhill skiers we traded into the club

Online one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97303
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #63 on: May 24, 2013, 12:34:06 PM »
We're still last for tackles in the AFL with 51.5 per game (AFL avg. 61).

Dusty is our most efficient tackler with 70% of his tackles sticking.



Who are the League's best tacklers?
By Mark Macgugan and Sam Russell
afl.com.au
Friday, May 24, 2013




http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-05-24/who-are-the-leagues-best-tacklers

Online one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97303
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #64 on: May 26, 2013, 12:26:42 AM »
Another low tackling game and we paid dearly :P.


The Bombers, who won the midfield battles convincingly, out-tackled the Tigers 60-49, despite winning more of the football.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-05-25/richmond-v-essendon-match-report


dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #65 on: May 26, 2013, 12:29:00 AM »
*queue jazz hands*

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #66 on: May 26, 2013, 12:48:27 AM »
Grigg how many tackles?
Nahas?
How many times did I see Jobe break through a tackle?
We have too many downhill skiers.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #67 on: May 26, 2013, 12:49:50 AM »
Is this a problem now? Well knock me down with a feather

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #68 on: May 26, 2013, 12:51:57 AM »
Intensity was shocking tonight TM.
Even our guns went silent. :shh

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #69 on: May 26, 2013, 01:15:07 AM »
Intensity was shocking tonight TM.
Even our guns went silent. :shh

What a surprise tb, intensity was lacking, so u just cant flick a switch and go bang?? This is no surprise, weve been lacking in this area all season bar 1 or 2 games. People can have a go at MrTigra but hes spot on its a big problem

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9615
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #70 on: May 26, 2013, 01:23:30 AM »
Intensity was shocking tonight TM.
Even our guns went silent. :shh

What a surprise tb, intensity was lacking, so u just cant flick a switch and go bang?? This is no surprise, weve been lacking in this area all season bar 1 or 2 games. People can have a go at MrTigra but hes spot on its a big problem
Why thankyou TM.  :thumbsup
It's nice to know I'm finally correct about something.  :clapping

Yes it's a very very serious issue. Too soft, too scared and weak as pee.
The club that keeps giving.

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #71 on: May 26, 2013, 01:26:32 AM »
Boys 5 yrs ago we were lamenting the fact we had all these flankers who couldn't kick and couldn't tackle. De Ja vu anyone. Issues remain albeit with different names.
We have gone backwards from this time last year even though we have won more games.

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7927
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #72 on: May 26, 2013, 07:38:12 AM »
Agree tucker and your sig is currently making me squirm thanks to the lack of ambition by the tigers
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #73 on: May 26, 2013, 08:21:29 AM »
Intensity was shocking tonight TM.
Even our guns went silent. :shh

What a surprise tb, intensity was lacking, so u just cant flick a switch and go bang?? This is no surprise, weve been lacking in this area all season bar 1 or 2 games. People can have a go at MrTigra but hes spot on its a big problem
Why thankyou TM.  :thumbsup
It's nice to know I'm finally correct about something.  :clapping

Yes it's a very very serious issue. Too soft, too scared and weak as pee.
I'm with you now.  :clapping

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: Our low tackling stats
« Reply #74 on: May 26, 2013, 08:24:09 AM »
Is this a problem now? Well knock me down with a feather

its only a problem when we lose  ;D in all seriousness its been a problem from the start of the season.